[pacman-dev] [PATCH 1/3] pacdiff: improve speed, accuracy finding active configs using pacmandb

[Jonathan]

Sure, does this mean you want a new version for all of them?
On Jul 19, 2013 10:30 PM, "Allan McRae" <allan at archlinux.org> wrote:

> On 20/07/13 12:03, Dave Reisner wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:12:35AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> >> On 19/07/13 09:29, Dave Reisner wrote:
> >>>>> +check_pacsave(){
> >>>>> + for f in "${1}" ${1}.[0-9]; do
> >>> Strange that you quoted one of these but not the other. You're hitting
> >>> the same 10+ pacsave problem here, too.
> >>>
> >>>   for f in "$1"{,.+([0-9])}
> >>>
> >>
> >> Question:  do we actually care about that?   Getting pacsaves with that
> >> many suffixes actually takes quite a bit of effort.
> >>
> >> Allan
> >>
> >
> > It doesn't require a whole lot of effort to support -- I see no reason
> > to implement the correct solution rather than a 90% solution.
> >
>
> OK:
>
> @Jonathan: the "Search and ..." patch will need adjusted too.
>
>
>