Hi all, This request has been rejected by Muflone, and I don't quite understand; is there a reason to keep these packages around? I'm pretty sure my packages in the AUR have been superseded by Laurent Carlier's (lcarlier/lordheavy) in [extra], and can only confuse users. Cheers, Eric On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:45 AM, <notify@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
1ace [1] filed a deletion request for vulkan [2]:
extra/vulkan-sdk & extra/vulkan-icd-loader replace these vulkan-sdk & vulkan-loader.
Not sure what to do about the different name though; should I push an update with the new name (vulkan-icd-loader) and `replaces=(vulkan- loader)` to make those who installed my package use the new name, and in a week (when hopefully people have upgraded to the new name) actually delete this one?
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/1ace/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vulkan/