[aur-general] [RFC] Draft of the AUR 4.0.0 migration notification

[Marcel Korpel]

* brent timothy saner <brent.saner at gmail.com> (Sun, 24 May 2015
21:05:22 -0400):
>> But for now, I think it's not necessary, as the new site will be
>> wiped before the mail will be sent, as far as I did understand
>> earlier mails about AUR 4.0.0. Or isn't it?
> 
> I'd have to check again- anyone else know off the top of their head if
> this is true?

I searched through my mails and found this one:
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2014-December/003014.html

In there Lukas said that AUR maintainers have to co-maintain packages
on the new and the old site simultaneously, but that's no longer the
case. As far as I can see he wanted to wipe current aur-dev/aur4.

Best,
Marcel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20150525/f220453e/attachment.asc>