- Arch-projects - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-projects] Dear arch-projects@archlinux.org June 83% 0FF
by VIAGRA � Official Site 29 Jun '08

29 Jun '08

1 0

[arch-projects] December 77% OFF
by VIAGRA � Official Site 05 Dec '07

05 Dec '07

1 0

[arch-projects] November 71% OFF
by VIAGRA � Official Site 04 Nov '07

04 Nov '07

2 1

[arch-projects] Modified projects.archlinux.org git repo
by Simo Leone 31 Oct '07

31 Oct '07

I deleted the "origin" branch, as this doesn't belong in a repo such as this one (and it was a subset of master anyway, no loss). Just a heads up. Also, I'm wondering about what the different branches in there are intended for. There are master, testing, and stable. Most git projects are set up where master is what would be considered 'stable', that's why I'm wondering. -- Simo Leone Arch Linux Developer

7 15

[arch-projects] [AUR] More AUR Progress
by tardo 29 Oct '07

29 Oct '07

In between the wee hours of the night, a few us has been patching the current AUR feverishly.. ok enough with the introductions, you know how we do this =] For those interested, a very unhelpful log of changes: http://git.nagi-fanboi.net/?p=aur.git;a=shortlog;h=testing The major and minor changes: - [Almost] complete separation of code and markup - XHTML validation on all [almost] pages - CSS validation on all pages - Completely re-written packages.php, pkgfuncs.inc, new pkgdetails.php - packages.php now ONLY serves as a search page - pkgdetails.php is ONLY used for pkgdetails. -- pkgdetails accepts two paramters, ID for the db pkg id, and name, an explicit way to search for a specific package -- e.g. aur/pkgdetails.php?ID=2501, or aur/pkgdetails.php?name=amarok-svn - pkgfuncs.inc has been heavily modified to include common functions from both - Universal login and search boxes - Annoying timeout problem [partially] fixed... now it just drops you to the home page without being logged in - Lots and lots of tiny bug fixes and cosmetic changes - My old (or new) pkgbuild parsing script still lives Here's a test site for the few, the chosen, the brave: http://aur.nagi-fanboi.net/ I'd write more, but I'll let you guys give the feedback. - tardo

4 9

[arch-projects] [AUR] Querying package ID from main repo
by tardo 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

I'd really like to be able to pull package ID numbers from the main site DB and put that in the AUR. From what I see, it seems like a simple SELECT statement (prefixed by a db_connect() or select_db() if on the same host). It's pretty trivial, and since handing out dumps of the main repo db just seems to be a no-no, how about someone look through the main site's code and finding that statement and throwing it in? For the record, I don't care about searching for packages on the search page, just being able to pull the ID of the package so I can provide a good link to the dependencies is enough (current method just searches, seems kinda half-assed). If I had a db dump/site code, here's sort of what I'd implement: db_connect( ... ); $q = "SELECT ID FROM Packages WHERE Name = 'pkgname'"; // table/columns may differ db_query($q); that should give a numerical result which I can link directly to on the package page, eg http://archlinux.org/packages/13418 If anyone can pull out the package ID, i can show what to change in the AUR (trivial really). - tardo

3 4

Re: [arch-projects] [tur-users] Mailing list name change/modifications
by Loui 24 Oct '07

24 Oct '07

Has someone complained about traffic on arch-projects? I think we should still keep arch-projects for general archlinux projects, especially for those projects which aren't 'hot' like AUR is right now. I'd be kind of annoying to have 1001 low-traffic MLs. I think. I guess renaming tur-users would make sense since 'trusted user repositories' don't really exist any more other than [community]

1 0

[arch-projects] fyi: moved my aur repo
by eliott 23 Oct '07

23 Oct '07

For those tracking my repo.... I moved it to my domain. git://code.cactuswax.net/aur.git/ I don't have gitweb up yet.

1 0

[arch-projects] AurJSON code.
by eliott 20 Oct '07

20 Oct '07

I finally got around to buttoning up my AurJSON code, and pused it to my master repo. I updated the 'example' clients that I had slapped together a little bit too. http://archlinux.org/~eliott/zomgstuff/rpc_examples.tar.gz Check it out. http://projects.archlinux.org/git/?p=aur-eliott.git;a=commit;h=7042f10a7b23… Let me know what you think.

3 4

[arch-projects] New package submission script
by tardo 13 Oct '07

13 Oct '07

There's nothing like writing php code in the dead hours of the night when you're stoked on sugar. That being said, I finally integrated my pkgbuild parsing code into a (almost completely) rewritten pkgsubmit.php. Here are some highlights (off the top of my head): - Now uses PEAR::Archive_Tar - Integrates my previous pkgbuild parsing script - Any GNU/Tar file will work, including .tar, .tar.gz, .tar.bz2 - Raw PKGBUILDs may be submitted as well (and only PKGBUILDs. PKGBUILDs that come with patches, install scripts, etc will need to be archived) - Absolutely ZERO exec/system commands There are some major and small changes to the submission process as well: - PKGBUILDs are thoroughly checked against Arch Packaging Standards (surprise surprise) - Uploaded archives are assumed to be correct (e.g. files in foo/PKGBUILD, foo/foo.install, etc), else rejected - The comment box has been removed. I've never seen the reason to always have to write "Initial upload" for a package - Overwrite option is gone. We check for permissions anyway, hence it's redundant There are some other tiny changes that just make the process a bit easier, but I'll leave that to your discovery. And now for the hard part, testing. I only got a handful of responses for my previous request, but I'm crossing my fingers this time. I've set up an adequate test site here: http://aur.nagi-fanboi.net Testers will probably need to register an account (just like in AUR), then submit packages. Possible bugs: - When I tried this on a local setup, uploaded files have 0600. The testing site maintains permissions, but I'm not sure what it is for the real AUR - Apparently there has to be a AUR syncdb script that moves files from INCOMING_DIR to URL_DIR. If someone can point me in the right direction for this, I'd be grateful (currently I'm reading from INCOMING_DIR) Since this not just any bugfix, but quite a rewrite, feedback is important. I'd like to open this up to discussion =] - tardo

3 2