I made the silly mistake of posting first to [arch-general]. Sorry!
On 2020-02-13 09:24, Morten Linderud wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:09:27AM -0800, Brett Cornwall via arch-general wrote:
>> Waybar  just had an update where it pulled in a project called "date"
>> . I'm hesitant to package this under the name "date" since GNU coreutils
>> shares a binary with that name. But this isn't a totally obscure library.
>> Should I persuade upstream to change the name? Should I package it under
>> another name? Or should I lay claim to the unused "date" package name and go
>> on with my life?
>"chrono-date" could maybe work as an alternative name?
>I'm unsure why this is in [arch-general] and not [arch-dev-public] :)
On 2020-02-13 02:24, David C. Rankin wrote:
>And with the note that much of Howard Hinnant's date/time library is being
>incorporated into the next C++ standard. Quite a feather in anyone's cap.
Does anyone have any strong opinions?