- Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

default gems in ruby deployment
by Andreas 'Segaja' Schleifer 16 Jul '22

16 Jul '22

Hello everyone, | | | || while trying to package the ruby framework rails [0] I stumbled over the fact that ruby itself is shipping an assortment of "default gems" which they call "Standard Library" [1] [2] || and something called "Bundled Gems" [3], which is another set of "default gems". || The problem I see in these gems is that they are pulled into the ruby source repo [4] from their dedicated original sources before a ruby release and then get used in the release. || Furthermore ruby itself does not release a new version of itself whenever a gem of this standard library updates, which means that over time sooner or later most of these gems in the bundle || will be out-of-date. || Now apparently ruby has a general solution for that. You can have multiple versions of one gem installed, the "default" versions do show up with a default prefix in the `gem list` output. || | | || So much for the actual ruby state. Now I would like to highlight some points I found out about how Arch Linux is packaging ruby and the issues I see with it. || | | || Our ruby package [5] is currently removing a total of nine pre-shipped gems from the main ruby release with the comment that they are shipped in seperate packages [6]. || I recently checked and found out that three of these removed gems are not provided as packages (anymore?). Namely rbs, typerof and erb. || Furthermore the PKGBUILD has code in there which states that it removes *all* bundled gems to avoid conflicts [7], but when I run a `gem list | grep 'default'` I still see the default gems. || After some research I found out the reason is because the path in which the default gems are located are not the path that we are removing with these three lines of code. || It could be that the location of these default gems changed in some version and was never updated. || | | || The problem I see in the current situation is that we have most of the default gems still installed and then some of them get upgraded (sometimes even to a higher major version) by dedicated packages. || This can potentially break dependency changes if one of the not upgraded default gems is requiring the gem that was upgraded to a new major version. || | | || From my point of view the only real fix for this is to make sure that we again remove all the default gems so that they can be packaged seperatly. Whether or not we want to provide all gems from the || "standard library" and "bundled gems" is then a different question and would in the end require more ruby packages. || Also I would recomment to add a comment to the PKGBUILD file of these gems stating that they are part of the "standard library" / "bundled gems" and such shouldn't be dropped from the repos in the future. || | | || We also could think about putting all the "standard library" gems (and maybe even the "bundled gems") in a package group called "ruby-stdlib" or a meta-package (which I think is better). || That way users could easily install all of them with one command and we also know which packages belong to the "ruby standard library". || | | || One side effect I see with this approach is that we currently have "hidden dependencies" on some of the standard library gems like in case of ruby-nokogiri [8], which is depending on ruby-racc which is not listed in the PKGBUILD file. || Currently this package only works because racc is one of the gems in the standard library [9] and such pre-installed. If we now cleanup the ruby package we need to fix such issues. || | | || | | || Best regards || Segaja || | | || | | || [0] https://rubyonrails.org/ || [1] https://rubyreferences.github.io/rubyref/stdlib.html || [2] https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-3.1.2/ || [3] https://rubyreferences.github.io/rubyref/stdlib/bundled.html || [4] https://github.com/ruby/ruby/tree/master/lib || [5] https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/ruby/ || [6] https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/blob/packages/ruby/trunk/PKG… || [7] https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/blob/packages/ruby/trunk/PKG… || [8] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/71500 ||[9] https://rubyreferences.github.io/rubyref/stdlib/string-utilities/racc.html|

4 16

Blockers for release of archlinux-keyring
by David Runge 12 Jul '22

12 Jul '22

Hi all, if you are a main signing key holder or a packager for Arch Linux, please read this mail very carefully! We are currently blocked from releasing a new version of archlinux-keyring, as a release would imply demoting a few packager keys to marginal trust (aka. not enough signatures from our signing keys to be allowed to package). Some of these marginal trust keys still (or again...) have packages in the repositories. All in all the keyring is not in very good shape due to missing revocations or signatures (and broken keys that block us from updating to a newer gnupg version, but that is for another email). Blocking the release of archlinux-keyring for this long is problematic in several ways: * existing keys that need to be updated are blocked from being released to the users and packages may need to be rebuilt if keys expire on user systems (which leads to manual action to install the keyring first, etc.) * new keys can not be released to the users (blocking packagers from packaging, leading to many outdated packages that need to be taken over by other packagers) * the updated trust status of revoked keys can not be released to the users (allowing old keys to still package) # Marginal trust keys There are currently 25(!) marginal trust keys in the keyring, some of which are old and superseded by new keys (I had to manually assign which of the keys are old/new/current for the below overview). ``` alucryd 9437DD3815A7A9169E3D3946AFF5D95098BC6FF5 ~ marginal - old andrewSC 601F20F1D1BBBF4A78CF5B6DF6B1610B3ECDBC9F ~ marginal - current arodseth 8A9BC5819C54FEB3DC2A9B48C32217F6F13FF192 ~ marginal - old arodseth 962855F072C7A01846405864FCF3C8CB5CF9C8D4 ~ marginal - new cbehan 6EA3F3F3B9082632A9CBE931D53A0445B47A0DAB ~ marginal - old coderobe 54EB4D6DB209862C8945CACCED84945B35B2555C ~ marginal - current dbermond 3FFA6AB7B69AAE6CCA263DDE019A7474297D8577 ~ marginal - old djgera 0F334D8698881578F65D2AE55ED514A45BD5C938 ~ marginal - old escondida CB33B736591A9CA06098A9A5FCAC9CF5A6EE1209 ~ marginal - old farseerfc 4B1DE545A801D4549BFD3FEF90CB3D62C13D4796 ~ marginal - old ibiru F4DDD6DDCEC320B665F502AAE8F18BA1615137BC ~ marginal - old jlichtblau 38EDD1886756924E1224E49524E4CDB0013C2580 ~ marginal - current jsteel 8742F7535E7B394A1B048163332C9C40F40D2072 ~ marginal - current juergen 355BDB97ED4724E6B3A450E7A3D9562A589874AB ~ marginal - old kgizdov 4BE61D684CB4E31741614E7089AA27231C530226 ~ marginal - old kkeen 48C3B1F30DDD0FE67E516D16396E3E25BAB142C1 ~ marginal - current maximbaz EB4F9E5A60D32232BB52150C12C87A28FEAC6B20 ~ marginal - old mtorromeo 2C118C620F02DB9AC1D0F9FA94DD2393DA2EE423 ~ marginal - old muflone C521846436D75A3294795B27B4360204B250F0D3 ~ marginal - old nicohood 97312D5EB9D7AE7D0BD4307351DAE9B7C1AE9161 ~ marginal - current spupykin 3E518BF2526FD1979E8AAE4965C110C1EA433FC7 ~ marginal - old tensor5 A9B6710D760F6617C530746EC847B6AEB0544167 ~ marginal - old thomas A314827C4E4250A204CE6E13284FC34C8E4B1A25 ~ marginal - old wild 0E87D6C3F9AF7FDED0C8588D22E3B67B4A86FDE7 ~ marginal - old xyne EC3CBE7F607D11E663149E811D1F0DC78F173680 ~ marginal - old ``` # Revoking "old" marginal trust keys Revoking these "old" keys is *very important* so that `keyringctl` properly assigns trust to the packager keys (no old key should be fully trusted or have marginal trust) and helps a lot in figuring out which keys need immediate attention going forward (because they are new or current keys!). As I have gotten mostly no reply from signing key holders in regards to this, I hereby ask Florian, Pierre and Levente to please revoke keys that need revoking [1] *now* and make sure that the revocation certificates are merged into the archlinux-keyring repository. The amount of open tickets is increasing and it makes working with the keyring more and more difficult if no action is taken! # Rebuilding packages of "old" marginal trust keys For some packager keys the process of rebuilding their packages has already been started more than four months ago [2], some of which are completed, but there are still some left [3][4][5]. I have checked the list of "old" marginal keys to see whether there are any packages in the repositories signed by them ([6]) and have created rebuild TODOs for any that needed them. # **IMPORTANT**: Rebuilding packages of "current" marginal trust keys If by Friday, 2022-07-15 20:00 CEST the marginal trust status of the "current" keys is not improved to fully trusted, the packages in the repositories signed by them will be rebuilt and a new version of archlinux-keyring will be released as soon as that is done (2022-07-16 or 2022-07-17 depending on availability). Help with any upcoming rebuilds will be very much appreciated! This means those "current" keys can not be used for packaging anymore. If you are the holder of an affected key or a main signing key holder, please communicate this accordingly, so that the key can be signed and a signature be merged in time! # Setting up packager keys for archweb If you are the holder of a packager key, please make sure to select your "current" or "new" packager key in your archweb profile, so that the signature status [7] is displayed correctly. We have *a lot* of keys that are not setup correctly. # New main signing key: Jonas Witschel Last but not least, I would like to thank Jonas for stepping up and taking on the responsibility of main signing key for Arch Linux [8]. Most, if not all packagers should by now have received a verification email by him :) Best, David [1] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/archlinux-keyring/-/issues/?label_na… [2] https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/arch-dev-public@lists.archlinux.o… [3] https://archlinux.org/todo/rebuild-packages-signed-by-48c3b1f30ddd0fe67e516… [4] https://archlinux.org/todo/rebuild-packages-signed-by-9437dd3815a7a9169e3d3… [5] https://archlinux.org/todo/rebuild-packages-signed-by-4b1de545a801d4549bfd3… [6] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/archlinux-keyring/-/wikis/workflows/… [7] https://archlinux.org/master-keys/ [8] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/archlinux-keyring/-/commit/42ca7f2c5… -- https://sleepmap.de

2 1

NEWS DRAFT: wxWidgets 3.2 update may need manual intervention
by Antonio Rojas 12 Jul '22

12 Jul '22

wxWidgets 3.2 provides a Qt frontend in addition to the GTK3 one, so packages have been renamed from wxgtk-* to wxwidgets-*. The GTK2 frontend is no longer provided. If you have wxgtk2 installed, the upgrade will fail with error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: removing wxgtk-common breaks dependency 'wxgtk-common' required by wxgtk2 In such case, uninstall wxgtk2 first with # pacman -Rc wxgtk2 and then proceed with the upgrade.

2 1

Arch Linux in June 2022
by Levente Polyak 08 Jul '22

08 Jul '22

## devtools The new devtools release brings in several new additions. First and foremost the `export-pkgbuild-keys` script in combination with `commitpkg` ensures we export all validpgpkeys into the source tree. The local keys cache will allow us to operate without remote PGP keyservers for the most part [0]. Furthermore the new `diffpkg` tool allows to automatically diff a package file against the current repository version or another package file. Multiple diff modes allow comparing archive listings, the whole content via diffoscope or the .PKGINFO and .BUILDINFO metadata [1]. Last but not least we have added `x86_64_v3` builders as a first step towards more optimized architectures. The scripts and configs can be used for testing purposes [2]. ## archlinux.page In cooperation with SPI and Gandi a new domain has been acquired to host the documentation of projects related to Arch Linux: https://archlinux.page First deployments are already available on the following subdomains: - https://repod.archlinux.page/ - https://monthly-reports.archlinux.page/ ## archiso The official installation ISO image can now boot on IA32 UEFI [3]. ## SPI The annual SPI report for member projects updates has been submitted and will be available shortly through SPI. ## glibc The glibc package ships with the `C.UTF-8` locale available by default. [0] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/devtools/-/merge_requests/98 [1] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/devtools/-/merge_requests/99 [2] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/devtools/-/merge_requests/86 [3] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/archiso/-/merge_requests/216

1 0

Gone until August
by Morten Linderud 27 Jun '22

27 Jun '22

Yo, I'll be gone from the start of July until the start of August! Vacation time along with starting a new job over the summer. I also need to recharge some batteries. If you need anything from me please tell me so we can sort it asap. Else I will be reachable if there is something important, but I won't be prioritizing it. The only exception will be a few days at May Contain Hacker in Netherlands next month where I'll be doing a self-organized session and distributing some stickers :) I've included a list of packages I'm the sole maintainer of. Feel free to co-maintain or update it when there are new releases available. Note the list contains core/extra/community packages. -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 # Packages $ pkgsearch -m Foxboron -l 1 archlinux-contrib archlinux-repro asp b4 barrier bmusb bucklespring catatonit cni-plugins debugedit docker-scan dqlite flatpak-xdg-utils fsverity-utils fuse-overlayfs gopls go-tools grobi hy i3-gaps influx-cli influxdb jgmenu jq libmd mlocate mopidy nageru nano-syntax-highlighting pass-otp patatt pdfjs perl-data-perl perl-gnupg-interface perl-moox-handlesvia perl-moox-late perl-search-xapian perl-strictures perl-sub-handlesvia perl-type-tiny plocate podman-dnsname protege public-inbox python2-docs python2-typing python-adblock python-babel python-docs python-dotty-dict python-flask-babel python-formencode python-guzzle-sphinx-theme python-halo python-hid python-hjson python-jsonrpclib-pelix python-keyutils python-ldap python-log_symbols python-m2crypto python-milc python-nbxmpp python-nltk python-pew python-pydbus python-pydocstyle python-pydrive python-pyflakes python-pygame python-pykka python-pypeg2 python-pywal python-reportlab python-rope python-send2trash python-shutilwhich python-speaklater python-sphinx-autorun python-spinners python-sqlobject python-sqlparse python-typed-ast python-xlib qmk qprint raft screenkey signing-party staticcheck step-ca tailscale toolbox vim-ultisnips wpa_supplicant xdp-tools

5 4

Arch Linux in May 2022
by Levente Polyak 14 Jun '22

14 Jun '22

## Staff We would like to welcome Slithery [0] among our Forum Admins. Furthermore fukawi2 has stepping down [1] as Forum Admin. We would like to express appreciation for all the work through the years. Last but not least we held our first Mediator election where Andrea Denisse Gómez-Martínez (denisse), David Runge (dvzrv) and Morgan Adamiec (morganamilo) were elected. This has implemented the previously ratified RFC-0009 [2]. An official mediation program in our organization helps to settle disputes and provides a clear escalation path. ## gnome boxes Gnome boxes now supports installing Arch Linux from an ISO using our GeoIP mirror. ## mailman3 We started migrating our mailing lists from mailman2 to mailman3. The migration is handled list by list by DevOps. All mailman3 lists will have their From header kept unmangled, preserving the sent mail as is hence allowing to validate DKIM signatures. [0] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/infrastructure/-/issues/454 [1] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/infrastructure/-/issues/456 [2] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/9

1 0

auth-tarball-from-git: verifying signed git tags without sha256sums=(SKIP)
by kpcyrd 29 May '22

29 May '22

ohai! I blogged about a new tool that can be used to verify a tarball from a signed git tag, while still pinning the sourcecode with >= sha256sum: https://vulns.xyz/2022/05/auth-tarball-from-git/ Let me know what you think - that's all, kpcyrd

6 7

News draft: qmk>=1.1.0-1 update may require manual intervention
by Morten Linderud 29 May '22

29 May '22

The qmk package prior to version 1.1.0-1 was missing the compiled python modules. This has been fixed so the upgrade may need to overwrite any untracked pyc files created. If you get errors like these qmk: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/qmk_cli/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-310.pyc exists in filesystem qmk: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/qmk_cli/__pycache__/git.cpython-310.pyc exists in filesystem qmk: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/qmk_cli/__pycache__/helpers.cpython-310.pyc exists in filesystem qmk: /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/qmk_cli/__pycache__/script_qmk.cpython-310.pyc exists in filesystem when updating, use pacman -Syu --overwrite /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/qmk_cli/\* to perform the upgrade. -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16

3 2

Arch Linux in April 2022
by Levente Polyak 24 May '22

24 May '22

## Keyring We have started phasing out sha1 keyring signatures and replace some existing keys with more modern variants. Furthermore we have started to enforce @archlinux.org UIDs so we can control the retrieval via wkd in a single place and also allow externals to just trust one official wkd domain. ## Security Team We would like to welcome djerun and raa who will help us in the security team to keep track of all vulnerabilities. ## Wiki We would like to welcome Erus Iluvatar as an ArchWiki Maintainer and Translator [0]. ## Infrastructure We now have a GeoIP based mirror https://geo.mirror.pkgbuild.com for docker images and arch-boxes. After a MR lands in osinfo-db this will allow users on all distro's with an update osinfo-db to use gnome-boxes to install Arch Linux with the "download operating system" option. [0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/ArchWiki:News#2022/04/13_-_New_maintainer_… [1] https://gitlab.com/libosinfo/osinfo-db/-/merge_requests/444

1 0

Mailman3 migration and news draft
by Kristian Klausen 17 May '22

17 May '22

Hi all, As hinted in my last message, I'm in the process of migrating our mailing lists from mailman2 to mailman3[1]. We are migrating away from mailman2 as it is basically unmaintained and requires Python 2 which is EOL. At the time of writing the following active lists haven't been migrated: - arch-commits - arch-general - arch-security - aur-dev - aur-general - aur-requests - pacman-contrib - pacman-dev I'm planning to migrate the remaining lists soon and likely migrating arch-general and aur-general as the last two lists. As part of the migration I'm disabling the "mangling" of the mails to keep the DKIM signature intact (i.e. no rewrite of the "from" header nor prefixing the subject with the list name), this means "reply list" must be used when replying to the list. For that reason I think the change is worth a news item, so the users know they must use "reply list" and that they may need to update their filters. I have created a draft here[2] which I hope to post after migrating the remaining lists (feel free to edit). [1] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/infrastructure/-/issues/59 [2] https://md.archlinux.org/mDhhaF0WRaOPMmyYqifn2Q Cheers, Kristian Klausen

2 1