- Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 20 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 6 fully signed off packages * 28 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (20 total) == * ldns-1.6.16-1 (i686) * openssh-6.1p1-4 (i686) * ldns-1.6.16-1 (x86_64) * openssh-6.1p1-4 (x86_64) * avidemux-2.5.6-4 (i686) * ffmpeg-1:1.0-2 (i686) * gst-plugins-ugly-1.0.2-2 (i686) * gstreamer0.10-ugly-0.10.19-3 (i686) * mplayer-35420-1 (i686) * opal-3.10.7-3 (i686) * vlc-2.0.4-4 (i686) * x264-20121113-1 (i686) * avidemux-2.5.6-4 (x86_64) * ffmpeg-1:1.0-2 (x86_64) * gst-plugins-ugly-1.0.2-2 (x86_64) * gstreamer0.10-ugly-0.10.19-3 (x86_64) * mplayer-35420-1 (x86_64) * opal-3.10.7-3 (x86_64) * vlc-2.0.4-4 (x86_64) * x264-20121113-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (9 total) == * dhcpcd-5.6.2-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * iputils-20121114-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * ldns-1.6.16-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lvm2-2.02.98-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openssh-6.1p1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ldns-1.6.16-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openssh-6.1p1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (19 total) == * avidemux-2.5.6-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ffmpeg-1:1.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gst-plugins-ugly-1.0.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gstreamer0.10-ugly-0.10.19-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer-35420-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2012.1.15-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * opal-3.10.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vlc-2.0.4-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * x264-20121113-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xf86-video-intel-2.20.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avidemux-2.5.6-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ffmpeg-1:1.0-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * gst-plugins-ugly-1.0.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gstreamer0.10-ugly-0.10.19-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mplayer-35420-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * opal-3.10.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vlc-2.0.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * x264-20121113-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xf86-video-intel-2.20.13-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (6 total) == * mkinitcpio-0.11.2-1 (any) * tzdata-2012j-1 (any) * dhcpcd-5.6.2-2 (x86_64) * iputils-20121114-1 (x86_64) * lvm2-2.02.98-3 (x86_64) * ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2012.1.15-4 (x86_64) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 7 signoffs 2. bisson - 4 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[arch-dev-public] [community] migration guide to nymeria
by Florian Pritz 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

Hi, [community] has now moved to nymeria. That means you now have a 100Mbit/s uplink and lots of disk space (1TB disks, 200GB volume for now) Host name: nymeria.archlinux.org User name: same as archweb login name RSA fingerprint: cd:26:69:1a:7c:7f:bd:bd:42:4f:d7:ee:27:37:27:b4 DSA fingerprint: 11:a3:e7:27:9c:6d:8f:42:be:7c:31:93:05:1e:ad:36 ECDSA fingerprint: 6e:8b:ce:e4:74:92:3d:c2:67:9a:2f:8f:66:8b:96:e1 Migration: - dbscripts is in "/srv/repos/svn-community/dbscripts". Feel free to write yourself an alias. - authorized ssh keys have been migrated, user names have been changed to match archweb login names. - fix your ~/.ssh/config so the user name is correct (only needed for running dbscripts) - your old home from sigurd is available in /mnt/old_homes/sigurd/$user - update devtools to 20121112 or newer - run for all checkouts: "svn relocate svn+ssh://sigurd.archlinux.org/srv/svn-packages svn+ssh://svn-community@nymeria.archlinux.org/srv/repos/svn-community /svn" - do the same on pkgbuild.com if you use svn there You will only have account on nymeria if you were marked active in archweb and either in the TU or dev group. If you only had an account on gerolde you might have an one on nymeria already, but it won't yet have any authorized ssh keys. If something is broken please tell Pierre or me via mail or IRC (we are both in #archlinux-projects). -- Florian Pritz

6 7

[arch-dev-public] steam in our repos?
by Pierre Schmitz 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

Hi all, I just noticed that steam was put into the multilib repo. It's unfortunate that such questionable packages are brought into our repos without any discussion (similar case are the catalyst drivers). My concern is it's license here. We modify and redistribute steam here which is probably not allowed according to 1.B of steam's license. So unless I am wrong here or there is a written permission from Valve please remove this package asap. PS: It would be great if people would send a mail to this list before they add random packages; especially if they don't have a free license. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://pierre-schmitz.com

3 5

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 4 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * tzdata-2012j-1 (any) * iputils-20121114-1 (i686) * iputils-20121114-1 (x86_64) * xf86-video-intel-2.20.13-1 (i686) * xf86-video-intel-2.20.13-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (10 total) == * binutils-2.23.1-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * dhcpcd-5.6.2-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * iputils-20121114-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * lvm2-2.02.98-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rfkill-0.4-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dhcpcd-5.6.2-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * iputils-20121114-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rfkill-0.4-6 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (4 total) == * ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2012.1.15-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xf86-video-intel-2.20.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2012.1.15-4 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xf86-video-intel-2.20.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (4 total) == * mkinitcpio-0.11.2-1 (any) * tzdata-2012j-1 (any) * binutils-2.23.1-1 (x86_64) * lvm2-2.02.98-3 (x86_64) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 4 signoffs 2. stephane - 3 signoffs 3. dreisner - 3 signoffs 4. foutrelis - 1 signoffs 5. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Nov '12

14 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 3 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * mkinitcpio-0.11.2-1 (any) * binutils-2.23.1-1 (i686) * binutils-2.23.1-1 (x86_64) * ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2012.1.15-4 (i686) * ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2012.1.15-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (10 total) == * mkinitcpio-0.11.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * binutils-2.23.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dhcpcd-5.6.2-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * lvm2-2.02.98-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rfkill-0.4-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * binutils-2.23.1-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * dhcpcd-5.6.2-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rfkill-0.4-6 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (2 total) == * ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2012.1.15-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2012.1.15-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (3 total) == * kmod-11-1 (i686) * kmod-11-1 (x86_64) * lvm2-2.02.98-3 (x86_64) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Nov '12

13 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 1 known bad package * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 4 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * cabal-install-1.16.0.2-1 (i686) * cabal-install-1.16.0.2-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (8 total) == * dhcpcd-5.6.2-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * glib2-2.34.2-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * lvm2-2.02.98-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rfkill-0.4-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dhcpcd-5.6.2-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rfkill-0.4-6 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (2 total) == * cabal-install-1.16.0.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cabal-install-1.16.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (4 total) == * kmod-11-1 (i686) * glib2-2.34.2-1 (x86_64) * kmod-11-1 (x86_64) * lvm2-2.02.98-3 (x86_64) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 4 signoffs 2. tpowa - 2 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs 4. ibiru - 1 signoffs

1 0

[arch-dev-public] [community] [extra] repos moving to nymeria
by Florian Pritz 12 Nov '12

12 Nov '12

Hi, [community] (svn + dbscripts) will soon (likely this week) move to nymeria.archlinux.org. Since we want uniform user names across most systems, they will be taken from archweb. If you do not want your archweb user name to be your ssh account name, please send me a mail or ping me on IRC. You should also know that the setup on nymeria is slightly different from sigurd so there might be some problems although we did preliminary testing. If something is broken please tell me or Pierre via mail or IRC (we are both in #archlinux-projects). core/extra will follow soonish. Migration instructions will follow once we move. -- Florian Pritz

4 10

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Nov '12

12 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 1 known bad package * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 3 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * rfkill-0.4-6 (i686) * rfkill-0.4-6 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (12 total) == * ca-certificates-20121105-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * dhcpcd-5.6.2-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * glib2-2.34.2-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * kmod-11-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * lvm2-2.02.98-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * nfs-utils-1.2.6-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * rfkill-0.4-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dhcpcd-5.6.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glib2-2.34.2-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rfkill-0.4-6 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (3 total) == * kmod-11-1 (x86_64) * lvm2-2.02.98-3 (x86_64) * nfs-utils-1.2.6-3 (x86_64) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 6 signoffs 2. stephane - 2 signoffs 3. heftig - 1 signoffs

1 0

[arch-dev-public] "adm" and "log" groups
by Jan Steffens 11 Nov '12

11 Nov '12

The meaning of these two groups ("adm" and "log") seems to be identical. Both allow read access to system logs, except "adm" is used by journald and "log" by syslogd (and tomcat, apparently). Wouldn't it make sense to do away with one?

3 2

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Nov '12

11 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 11 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * mkinitcpio-0.11.1-1 (any) * dhcpcd-5.6.2-2 (i686) * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-4 (i686) * dhcpcd-5.6.2-2 (x86_64) * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (14 total) == * ca-certificates-20121105-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * man-pages-3.44-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-0.11.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bison-2.6.5-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dhcpcd-5.6.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glib2-2.34.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * kmod-11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lvm2-2.02.98-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * nfs-utils-1.2.6-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * bison-2.6.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dhcpcd-5.6.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glib2-2.34.2-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mkinitcpio-nfs-utils-0.3-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (5 total) == * cairo-1.12.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libdrm-2.4.40-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pixman-0.28.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xf86-video-ati-1:7.0.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xorg-server-1.13.0-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (11 total) == * tzdata-2012i-1 (any) * iputils-20121106-1 (i686) * iputils-20121106-1 (x86_64) * kmod-11-1 (x86_64) * lvm2-2.02.98-3 (x86_64) * nfs-utils-1.2.6-3 (x86_64) * cairo-1.12.8-2 (x86_64) * libdrm-2.4.40-1 (x86_64) * pixman-0.28.0-1 (x86_64) * xf86-video-ati-1:7.0.0-1 (x86_64) * xorg-server-1.13.0-4 (x86_64) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 7 signoffs 2. lcarlier - 4 signoffs 3. dan - 2 signoffs 4. stephane - 1 signoffs 5. dreisner - 1 signoffs

1 0