- Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64: core, extra, community 25-06-2010
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 25 Jun '10

25 Jun '10

================================================== = Integrity Check x86_64 of core,extra,community = ================================================== Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> parsing db files ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking hierarchy ==> checking for circular dependencies ==> checking for differences between db files and pkgbuilds Duplicate PKGBUILDs --------------------- /srv/abs/rsync/any/core/pacman-mirrorlist vs. /srv/abs/rsync/x86_64/core/pacman-mirrorlist Missing Dependencies ---------------------- community/airsnort --> 'wlan-ng26-utils' community/cdfs --> 'kernel26<2.6.34' community/em8300 --> 'kernel26<2.6.34' community/open-vm-tools-modules --> 'kernel26<2.6.34' community/qc-usb-messenger --> 'kernel26<2.6.34' community/sysprof-module --> 'kernel26<2.6.' extra/archboot --> 'ar9170-fw>=1.0-2' extra/archboot --> 'iwlwifi-1000-ucode>=128.50.3.1-1' extra/archboot --> 'iwlwifi-3945-ucode>=15.32.2.9-2' extra/archboot --> 'iwlwifi-4965-ucode>=228.61.2.24-2' extra/archboot --> 'iwlwifi-5000-ucode>=8.24.2.12-2' extra/archboot --> 'iwlwifi-5150-ucode>=8.24.2.2-2' extra/archboot --> 'iwlwifi-6000-ucode>=9.176.4.1-1' extra/archboot --> 'nouveau-drm>=0.0.16_20100313-1' extra/archboot --> 'rt2870usb-fw>=8-1' extra/archboot --> 'rt2x00-rt61-fw>=1.2-4' extra/archboot --> 'rt2x00-rt71w-fw>=1.8-4' extra/archboot --> 'vim>=7.2.385-1' extra/archboot --> 'xz-utils>=4.999.9beta-2' extra/libflashsupport --> 'flashplugin' Missing Makedepends --------------------- community/xmobar --> 'haskell-parsec>=3.1.0' extra/v86d --> 'kernel26<2.6.33' Repo Hierarchy for Dependencies --------------------------------- extra/pan depends on community/gmime22 (0 extra (make)deps to pull) Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends -------------------------------- core/ca-certificates depends on extra/python (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/ca-certificates depends on extra/ruby (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/crda depends on extra/python-m2crypto (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/e2fsprogs depends on extra/bc (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/groff depends on extra/ghostscript (138 extra (make)deps to pull) core/groff depends on extra/netpbm (45 extra (make)deps to pull) core/groff depends on extra/psutils (139 extra (make)deps to pull) core/iputils depends on extra/docbook-xsl (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/iputils depends on extra/libxslt (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/iputils depends on extra/opensp (30 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26 depends on extra/docbook-xsl (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26 depends on extra/xmlto (29 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26-docs depends on extra/docbook-xsl (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26-docs depends on extra/xmlto (29 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26-headers depends on extra/docbook-xsl (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26-headers depends on extra/xmlto (29 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26-manpages depends on extra/docbook-xsl (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26-manpages depends on extra/xmlto (29 extra (make)deps to pull) core/sqlite3 depends on extra/tcl (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev depends on extra/gobject-introspection (39 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev depends on extra/gperf (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev depends on extra/libxslt (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev-compat depends on extra/gobject-introspection (39 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev-compat depends on extra/gperf (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev-compat depends on extra/libxslt (25 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/bigloo depends on community/jdk (1 extra (make)deps to pull : jre) extra/dbus-python depends on community/docutils (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/gnome-speech depends on community/espeak (2 extra (make)deps to pull : portaudio docutils) extra/grml-zsh-config depends on community/txt2tags (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/midori depends on community/docutils (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/opengtl depends on community/llvm (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/openoffice-base-devel depends on community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/openoffice-sdk-devel depends on community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/vigra depends on community/python-sphinx (3 extra (make)deps to pull : pygments docutils python-jinja) extra/xqf depends on community/chrpath (0 extra (make)deps to pull) Packages found in db, but not in tree --------------------------------------- extra/koffice-l10n-fr extra/python-fpconst extra/python-soappy Summary --------- Missing PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names: 0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 1 Invalid archs: 0 Missing (make)dependencies: 22 Repo hierarchy problems: 36 Circular dependencies: 0 In db, but not in tree: 3 In tree, but not in db: 0

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 25-06-2010
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 25 Jun '10

25 Jun '10

================================================ = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community = ================================================ Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> parsing db files ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking hierarchy ==> checking for circular dependencies ==> checking for differences between db files and pkgbuilds Duplicate PKGBUILDs --------------------- /srv/abs/rsync/any/core/pacman-mirrorlist vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686/core/pacman-mirrorlist Missing Dependencies ---------------------- community/airsnort --> 'wlan-ng26-utils' community/cdfs --> 'kernel26<2.6.34' community/em8300 --> 'kernel26<2.6.34' community/open-vm-tools-modules --> 'kernel26<2.6.34' community/qc-usb-messenger --> 'kernel26<2.6.34' community/sysprof-module --> 'kernel26<2.6.' extra/archboot --> 'ar9170-fw>=1.0-2' extra/archboot --> 'iwlwifi-1000-ucode>=128.50.3.1-1' extra/archboot --> 'iwlwifi-3945-ucode>=15.32.2.9-2' extra/archboot --> 'iwlwifi-4965-ucode>=228.61.2.24-2' extra/archboot --> 'iwlwifi-5000-ucode>=8.24.2.12-2' extra/archboot --> 'iwlwifi-5150-ucode>=8.24.2.2-2' extra/archboot --> 'iwlwifi-6000-ucode>=9.176.4.1-1' extra/archboot --> 'nouveau-drm>=0.0.16_20100313-1' extra/archboot --> 'rt2870usb-fw>=8-1' extra/archboot --> 'rt2x00-rt61-fw>=1.2-4' extra/archboot --> 'rt2x00-rt71w-fw>=1.8-4' extra/archboot --> 'vim>=7.2.385-1' extra/archboot --> 'xz-utils>=4.999.9beta-2' Missing Makedepends --------------------- community/xmobar --> 'haskell-parsec>=3.1.0' extra/v86d --> 'kernel26<2.6.33' Repo Hierarchy for Dependencies --------------------------------- extra/pan depends on community/gmime22 (0 extra (make)deps to pull) Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends -------------------------------- core/ca-certificates depends on extra/python (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/ca-certificates depends on extra/ruby (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/crda depends on extra/python-m2crypto (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/e2fsprogs depends on extra/bc (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/groff depends on extra/ghostscript (138 extra (make)deps to pull) core/groff depends on extra/netpbm (45 extra (make)deps to pull) core/groff depends on extra/psutils (139 extra (make)deps to pull) core/iputils depends on extra/docbook-xsl (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/iputils depends on extra/libxslt (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/iputils depends on extra/opensp (30 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26 depends on extra/docbook-xsl (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26 depends on extra/xmlto (29 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26-docs depends on extra/docbook-xsl (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26-docs depends on extra/xmlto (29 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26-headers depends on extra/docbook-xsl (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26-headers depends on extra/xmlto (29 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26-manpages depends on extra/docbook-xsl (26 extra (make)deps to pull) core/kernel26-manpages depends on extra/xmlto (29 extra (make)deps to pull) core/sqlite3 depends on extra/tcl (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev depends on extra/gobject-introspection (39 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev depends on extra/gperf (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev depends on extra/libxslt (25 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev-compat depends on extra/gobject-introspection (39 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev-compat depends on extra/gperf (0 extra (make)deps to pull) core/udev-compat depends on extra/libxslt (25 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/bigloo depends on community/jdk (1 extra (make)deps to pull : jre) extra/dbus-python depends on community/docutils (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/gnome-speech depends on community/espeak (2 extra (make)deps to pull : portaudio docutils) extra/grml-zsh-config depends on community/txt2tags (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/midori depends on community/docutils (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/opengtl depends on community/llvm (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/openoffice-base-devel depends on community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/openoffice-sdk-devel depends on community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/vigra depends on community/python-sphinx (3 extra (make)deps to pull : pygments docutils python-jinja) extra/xqf depends on community/chrpath (0 extra (make)deps to pull) Packages found in db, but not in tree --------------------------------------- extra/koffice-l10n-fr extra/python-fpconst extra/python-soappy Summary --------- Missing PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names: 0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 1 Invalid archs: 0 Missing (make)dependencies: 21 Repo hierarchy problems: 36 Circular dependencies: 0 In db, but not in tree: 3 In tree, but not in db: 0

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Policy on cross-repo makedepends?
by Allan McRae 25 Jun '10

25 Jun '10

Do we have a policy on cross-repo makedepends? i.e. using makedepends in [extra] for packages in [core]. I ask because I want to bring dejagnu to [extra] so I can do "make check" for gcc/binutils/etc in their PKGBUILD. (I currently do it myself using a local dejagnu package). I would just go ahead do it, but our integrity check script list makedepends repo hierarchy amongst the list of issues. Allan

3 3

[arch-dev-public] Away for a while
by Jan de Groot 25 Jun '10

25 Jun '10

I will be away for a while in the next two weeks. I do have wireless internet access, but I won't do much more than checking my email during that.

2 1

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] glibc-2.12-4
by Allan McRae 25 Jun '10

25 Jun '10

Strip /lib/ld-2.12.so less. This is needed for valgrind on x86_64. Thanks to Jan for noticing only two hours after I moved the package to [core]! :) Signoff both, Allan

4 4

[arch-dev-public] [singoff] man-pages 3.25-1
by Andreas Radke 24 Jun '10

24 Jun '10

minor upstream update. please signoff any arch. -Andy

3 3

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] nvidia, nvidia-utils 256.35-1
by Pierre Schmitz 23 Jun '10

23 Jun '10

Hi all, I have updated the nvidia driver to 256.35. Their installer seems to be still unusable so we have to do it on our own. I rewrote the PKGBUILD to make this easier. Also the following bugs were fixed: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19727 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19340 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18486 Just let me know if things still work; especially for those using vdpau and opencl as I don't have recent hardware to test. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

3 2

[arch-dev-public] away Jun 27 - Jul 10
by Andreas Radke 23 Jun '10

23 Jun '10

Time for family. I won't have internet access. Keep Arch running and feel free to fix all my bugs... -Andy

2 1

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] glibc-2.12-3
by Allan McRae 23 Jun '10

23 Jun '10

The new defaults in makepkg more aggressively strip shared libraries. Doing this for certain libraries in glibc causes gdb breakage so all file stripping must be done manually. Also, grab the latest from the glibc-2.12 branch as it contains a couple of new bugfixes. Signoff both, Allan

5 6

[arch-dev-public] Pacman Architecture option (was: [signoff] pacman 3.4.0-2)
by Dan McGee 22 Jun '10

22 Jun '10

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Pierre Schmitz <pierre(a)archlinux.de> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:21:32 +0200, Thomas Bächler <thomas(a)archlinux.org> > wrote: >> Am 22.06.2010 15:31, schrieb Allan McRae: >>> "Architecture = auto" causes issues on any system where the kernel is >>> not built for the same architecture as the packages (waves hand as >>> someone who cannot use it...). "Architecture = none" causes no >>> restrictions on the system setup so is the default. >> >> 'Architecture = auto' is the common case, so it should be the default >> (and actually, the default configuration file contains it). >> 'Architecture = none' is a rare corner case that virtually nobody will >> need, so it should not be the default. Just my 2 cents on sane default >> values. > > I agree with Thomas here; the common case should be the default; not the > rare corner case. At least on Arch you don't have mixed architectures > anyway. This is the last thing I will say on this. Where the heck were you guys 11 months ago? Surely not following development, but you want to piss about it now. Discussion: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-July/008965.html http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-July/008968.html http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-July/008970.html Patches (with no feedback, mind you): http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2009-August/009193.html Yes, Aaron did seem to lean your direction, but nothing persuasive enough to convince either me (who proposed the idea) or Xavier (who coded the idea) change our minds. It's put up or shut up, so to speak. I'm not saying you guys need to be turning out a patch a week to be able to offer opinions, but the statue of limitations on complaints is surely shorter than 11 months. Please don't see this as a personal blow to either of you guys- you both do a lot of great work around here. It just sucks to see 6 or so emails bitching about a feature (not even a bug!) that has been set for as long as this one has. -Dan

3 3