- Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64 30-01-2009
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 30 Jan '09

30 Jan '09

====================================== = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra = ====================================== Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking for circular dependencies Summary --------- Missing PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names: 0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid archs: 0 Missing (make)dependencies: 0 Repo hierarchy problems: 0 Circular dependencies: 0

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686 30-01-2009
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 30 Jan '09

30 Jan '09

====================================== = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra = ====================================== Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking for circular dependencies Summary --------- Missing PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names: 0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid archs: 0 Missing (make)dependencies: 0 Repo hierarchy problems: 0 Circular dependencies: 0

1 0

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] bash 3.2.048-3, texinfo 4.13a-2, glibc 2.9-3
by Aaron Griffin 29 Jan '09

29 Jan '09

These three packages contain fixes for our core dep-cycle that was discussed in another thread. Changes: texinfo now scans *all* info files on install (not on upgrade) - this means that packages do not need direct deps, as it will pick up all info files when it's installed glibc and bash no longer require/depend on texinfo - existence of install-info is checked before running it Please signoff. The install ISOs need these packages to ensure installation happens cleanly.

5 19

[arch-dev-public] Fix texinfo-based depcycles in core
by Aaron Griffin 28 Jan '09

28 Jan '09

This idea is Thomas', I take no credit, except that I actually wrote it up. The idea: texinfo, on install, processes all info files. bash and glibc (and, likely, other packages in core) no longer need to depend on texinfo, but should check for install-info in the scriptlets before running. a) user installs bash and glibc. No info files are processed, texinfo not installed user then installs texinfo, all info files are processed b) user installs texinfo first (somehow) user then installs bash, info files processed due to existence of install-info c) user follows case a or b user upgrades bash or glibc, info files processed as normal due to presence of install-info Any issues with this? See attached patch. Please review. If possible, this needs to go to core before we release the ISOs.

3 10

[arch-dev-public] Fwd: Fix texinfo-based depcycles in core [Try 2]
by Aaron Griffin 27 Jan '09

27 Jan '09

{ EDIT: tpowa pointed out that 'which' does not exist at this point. Convert to [ -x /usr/bin/install-info ] format, and use the full path everywhere just to be sure } This idea is Thomas', I take no credit, except that I actually wrote it up. The idea: texinfo, on install, processes all info files. bash and glibc (and, likely, other packages in core) no longer need to depend on texinfo, but should check for install-info in the scriptlets before running. a) user installs bash and glibc. No info files are processed, texinfo not installed user then installs texinfo, all info files are processed b) user installs texinfo first (somehow) user then installs bash, info files processed due to existence of install-info c) user follows case a or b user upgrades bash or glibc, info files processed as normal due to presence of install-info Any issues with this? See attached patch. Please review. If possible, this needs to go to core before we release the ISOs.

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Core freeze soon
by Aaron Griffin 27 Jan '09

27 Jan '09

Hello all, I'd appretiate it if we could get all testing packages that need to go to core in core as soon as we can. I am upload the "beta2" ISOs right now with some bug fixes, but think this may fix things and allow us to fully release. On the day we build the release ISOs, I'd like to have core in a nice state. Cheers, Aaron

3 4

[arch-dev-public] You've received an answer to your question
by arch-dev-public＠archlinux.org 27 Jan '09

27 Jan '09

1 0

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.28.2-1
by Tobias Powalowski 26 Jan '09

26 Jan '09

Hi guys, new kernel adresses the following things: - bump to latest version please signoff for both arches greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

5 4

[arch-dev-public] /usr/share/info/dir?
by Thomas Bächler 25 Jan '09

25 Jan '09

I don't know what this file is, but source-highlight contains /usr/share/info/dir, which existed in my filesystem but didn't belong to any package. Looks wrong to me ...

5 5

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] gcc{,-libs} 4.3.3-1
by Andreas Radke 25 Jan '09

25 Jan '09

a new compiler release. please signoff. (gcc-gcj should soon hit testing as well. still have to solve a minor build issue) -Andy

2 1