- Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] file 4.23-1
by Andreas Radke 02 Jan '08

02 Jan '08

in testing for both architectures. just an update. -Andy

4 3

[arch-dev-public] zsh, bash and filesystem
by Pierre Schmitz 02 Jan '08

02 Jan '08

Hello and a Happy New Year! I am just testing zsh as a replacement of bash. Our zsh does not really work out-of-the-box. It does not use /etc/profile and as a result of this you cannot type or read umlauts etc.. I have opened a bug about this: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8946 But there does not seems to be a straight-forward-solution; so we should discuss about this first. I have noticed that Aaron introduced a generic /etc/profile which will load all scripts in /etc/profile.d/ and source any specific file like /etc/profile.zsh, /etc/profile.bash etc.. At first: the filesystem package should be bumped to get the new /etc/profile due to a pacman bug (?). Then we need to add a profile.zsh to the zsh package. I have attached a working one based on the one found within the bash package. The configure-line o zsh should be changed to the following: ./configure --prefix=/usr --bindir=/bin \ --enable-zprofile=/etc/profile \ --with-curses-terminfo \ --enable-multibyte || return 1 After this changes zsh is quite usable (even with utf8 etc.). But: This only works when logging in into a VT. If you start xterm, Konsole etc. you will end up in a zsh without any locale support and no environment variables set. Thomas told me that xterm does not use a login shell and because of this /etc/profile is not executed. (but why does this work with bash). Does anybody know a clean solution for this? Pierre PS: zsh seems to be really cool. The menu-based completition is quite nice. See my .zshrc (based on the one from grml): http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre/arch/zshrc -- http://www.archlinux.de

2 2

[arch-dev-public] Inactive for unspecified period of time
by Roman Kyrylych 31 Dec '07

31 Dec '07

oops, forgot to cc this to arch-dev-public [skipped] I've got a couple hours of internet today, so I thought I should write a quick update. First, thank you all! I don't imagine what would I do without the support from Arch community. I'm waiting for time when I can come back to work (on Arch, obviously :-)), I miss that so much. Next, a status update: * still no laptop at job (should get it next month, I think) and still very busy there * still no internet at home (long to explain why), hope to get it somewhere next week I wish you all Happy New Year (in advance because I won't be able to do so when it comes) and hope to see you soon. :-) -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)

1 0

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] mkinitcpio 0.5.17-2
by Aaron Griffin 30 Dec '07

30 Dec '07

This is a simple rebuild for changes that Dan checked into CVS a while ago... Fixed a source URL, and changed some deps. See here for some relevance: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8932

2 1

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] nano 2.0.7-1
by Andreas Radke 30 Dec '07

30 Dec '07

the new version is in testing for both architectures. we ship now the default nanorc.sample and don't add any further syntax highlighting. i've also added the nanorc to the backup array. http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8941 - fixed -Andy

3 3

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.23.12-3
by Tobias Powalowski 29 Dec '07

29 Dec '07

Hi kernel for both arches in testing, please signoff addresses those 2 bugs: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8949 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8948 - added last working alsa again greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

6 8

[arch-dev-public] x86_64 difflist broken - no packages listed
by James Rayner 27 Dec '07

27 Dec '07

Thought we were up to date.. but last time I viewed the difflist, it had all the packages in the repos on it. Now it has nothing. "core (packages i686: 0, packages x86_64: 0, different: 0)" I suppose if there's no packages in the repos, nothing can be different :) http://dev.archlinux.org/~andyrtr/pkg_diff.html James

3 2

[arch-dev-public] New spam vector: arch: Package [dosbox] marked out-of-date
by James 27 Dec '07

27 Dec '07

Someone doesnt like us. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Arch Website Notification <nobody(a)archlinux.org> Date: Dec 27, 2007 8:02 PM Subject: arch: Package [dosbox] marked out-of-date To: james(a)archlinux.org * Note: this is an automated message connoisseur(a)265.com wants to notify you that the following package may be out of date: dosbox (http://www.archlinux.org/packages/3283/) The user provided the following additional text: World of Warcraft Related: <ul><li><a href=http://www.mmogcart.com/power-leveling/power-leveling.jsp>wow power leveling</a> -New!</li><li><a href=http://www.mmogcart.com>wow gold</a></li><li><a href=http://www.wowgold-sale.com>wow gold</a></li><li><a href=http://www.power-levels.com>wow power leveling</a></li><li><a href=http://www.mygamesale.com>wow gold</a></li><li><a href=http://www.powerlevelings.com>wow power leveling</a></li><li><a href=http://www.wowgoldvip.com/wow-power-leveling.asp>power leveling</a></li><li><a href=http://www.mygamesale.com/power-leveling/>wow power leveling</a></li><li></a> <a href=http://www.game-level.com/World-Of-Warcraft-powerleveling.html>wow power leveling</a></li><li><a href=http://www.game-level.com/wow-power-leveling.html>wow power leveling</a></li><li><a href=http://www.mu56.com/Runescape-money-gold/>Runescape money</a></li><li><a href=http://www.rs2goldvip.com/runescape-money.aspx>Runescape money</a></li><li><a href=http://www.rs-sale.com/runescape-money/>Runescape money</a></li><li><a href=http://www.wowgoldvip.com/news_list.asp>wow gold</a></li></ul>mailto:wowgold@largeminmouse.net -- iphitus // Arch Developer // iphitus.loudas.com

2 1

[arch-dev-public] spam? Fwd: arch: Package [zsync] marked out-of-date
by Damir Perisa 27 Dec '07

27 Dec '07

it looks quite like spam to me, especially, since zsync is not out of date in my eyes (i don't know of newer sources) what do you think? - D ---------- Message transmis ---------- Betreff: arch: Package [zsync] marked out-of-date Datum: Thursday 27 December 2007 Von: Arch Website Notification <nobody(a)archlinux.org> An: damir(a)archlinux.org * Note: this is an automated message dote(a)sina.com wants to notify you that the following package may be out of date: zsync (http://www.archlinux.org/packages/6115/) The user provided the following additional text: World of Warcraft Related: <ul><li><a href=http://www.mmogcart.com/power-leveling/power-leveling.jsp>wow power leveling</a> -New!</li><li><a href=http://www.mmogcart.com>wow gold</a></li><li><a href=http://www.wowgold-sale.com>wow gold</a></li><li><a href=http://www.power-levels.com>wow power leveling</a></li><li><a href=http://www.mygamesale.com>wow gold</a></li><li><a href=http://www.powerlevelings.com>wow power leveling</a></li><li><a href=http://www.wowgoldvip.com/wow-power-leveling.asp>power leveling</a></li><li><a href=http://www.mygamesale.com/power-leveling/>wow power leveling</a></li><li></a> <a href=http://www.game-level.com/World-Of-Warcraft-powerleveling.html>wow power leveling</a></li><li><a href=http://www.game-level.com/wow-power-leveling.html>wow power leveling</a></li><li><a href=http://www.mu56.com/Runescape-money-gold/>Runescape money</a></li><li><a href=http://www.rs2goldvip.com/runescape-money.aspx>Runescape money</a></li><li><a href=http://www.rs-sale.com/runescape-money/>Runescape money</a></li><li><a href=http://www.wowgoldvip.com/news_list.asp>wow gold</a></li></ul>mailto:wowgold@largeminmouse.net ------------------------------------------------------- -- .·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·.¸¸.·´ ° ° ° ° ° ° ><((((º> ° ° ° ° ° <º)))>< <º)))><

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Packaging for x86_64
by James Rayner 27 Dec '07

27 Dec '07

Just an FYI, not really directed at anyone in particular, I've got Arch64 setup and have begun building my own packages for both platforms. I'll keep an eye on the difflist and do what I can. Nothing on it presently. Happy holidays. It's terribly quiet around here, so I'm sure you're all enjoying them. James

1 0