- Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-dev-public] initscripts in testing
by Tobias Powalowski 21 Oct '07

21 Oct '07

Hi i put new initscripts for both arches to testing. they should fix those bugs: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5740 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/6237 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7165 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7554 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7641 there are some feature requests which i didn't implemented yet comments from your side please: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7369 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7714 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7267 probably not implement / closing requests: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/5324 finally next step bump to next release name: we need a new release name :) suggestions please, i think the last name suggestion was "Hardcore". greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

7 19

[arch-dev-public] initscripts versioning
by Thomas Bächler 21 Oct '07

21 Oct '07

In the past, we used the release name (in this case 2007.11) for the initscripts versioning and bumped the pkgrel on bugfixes/changes. Now that we use a tarball on the ftp, what do we do? - Include the pkgrel in the tarball name (initscripts-2007.11-1.tar.bz2) - Add a postfix to the version number like with the isos (initscripts-2007.11.1.tar.bz2)

4 6

[arch-dev-public] GIT projects on gerolde: owners and groups
by Thomas Bächler 21 Oct '07

21 Oct '07

Aaron mentioned he would take care of this, but I wanted to bring this up so it isn't forgotten: For the git projects, we need: - A separate group for each project, instead of "projects" - An owner assigned to each project (not root) I am volunteering as the owner for the initscripts, klibc-extras and mkinitcpio projects.

2 1

[arch-dev-public] move of 2.6.23.1 in 8 hours
by Tobias Powalowski 21 Oct '07

21 Oct '07

Hi i'll move in 2.6.23.1 in 8 hours to core with all modules, if you have issues shout out now ;) greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

2 1

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] madwifi-{utils}-0.9.3.3
by Alexander Baldeck 21 Oct '07

21 Oct '07

Like the subject says. Tested on x86_64 with .23.1 on my end.

2 1

[arch-dev-public] Announce list?
by Aaron Griffin 20 Oct '07

20 Oct '07

Hey guys, I was approached by someone who was interested in keeping an eye on important things, but had to unsubscribe from this list due to high volume - too much that doesn't matter to a standard user. He brought up the idea of making a separate announce list for users to subscribe to for important happenings. None of us would NEED to be subscribed, as we could just send mails to BOTH lists when something is important. The specific items in question are the status report, and other things. What do you guys think? Aaron

6 12

[arch-dev-public] 2007.10 or 2007.11 release version?
by Tobias Powalowski 20 Oct '07

20 Oct '07

Hi, the question: Will the next release number be 2007.10 or 2007.11? i'm for 2007.11, test isos will be available next week until you find them stable it's probably the 1st november. An other interesting thing, i tested the ram usage in kvm-qemu today, results: core/ftp arch boot image: 160MB RAM (x86_64 WORKS setup: all packages selected) -> the i686 needs less RAM so it would work core lowmem boot image: 85MB RAM x86_64 (setup: all packages selected) -> the i686 needs less RAM so it would work core lowmem boot image: 64MB RAM (quickinst: cd install i686 WORKS, only base category installed!) (setup: cd install i686 WORKS, only base category installed!) Failures: (quickinst: cd install x86_64 FAILED, only base category installed!) (setup: cd install x86_64 FAILED, only base category installed!) x86_64 needs more memory thats normal and x86_64 have at least 256mb ram installed, else it would make me wonder. i'll correct this in documentation for next release. still pretty much but it's the pacman bug: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8155 ~ 50MB RAM takes pacman during full package installation which causes a OOM_KILL updating to libarchive 2.3.4 doesn't help either. new initscripts and filesystem will go to testing on sunday or monday morning. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

2 1

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-commits] CVS update of core/base/openssl (PKGBUILD)
by Jan de Groot 20 Oct '07

20 Oct '07

Be aware that OpenSSL 0.9.8g breaks ABI with 0.9.8f because it reverts the ABI incompatibility that was introduced with 0.9.8f. This means that anything that has been recompiled for 0.9.8f is broken again with 0.9.8g, the things that haven't been recompiled but that are broken at this moment do not need fixing. On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 16:02 -0400, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > Date: Saturday, October 20, 2007 @ 16:02:19 > Author: pierre > Path: /home/cvs-core/core/base/openssl > > Modified: PKGBUILD (1.38 -> 1.39) > > just commit to cvs; we can update this when rebuilding core etc. > > > ----------+ > PKGBUILD | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > Index: core/base/openssl/PKGBUILD > diff -u core/base/openssl/PKGBUILD:1.38 core/base/openssl/PKGBUILD:1.39 > --- core/base/openssl/PKGBUILD:1.38 Fri Oct 12 04:09:16 2007 > +++ core/base/openssl/PKGBUILD Sat Oct 20 16:02:19 2007 > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > -# $Id: PKGBUILD,v 1.38 2007/10/12 08:09:16 pierre Exp $ > +# $Id: PKGBUILD,v 1.39 2007/10/20 20:02:19 pierre Exp $ > # Maintainer: Pierre Schmitz <pierre(a)archlinux.de> > pkgname=openssl > -pkgver=0.9.8f > +pkgver=0.9.8g > pkgrel=1 > pkgdesc='The Open Source toolkit for Secure Sockets Layer and Transport Layer Security' > arch=('i686' 'x86_64') > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ > options=('!makeflags') > source=("http://www.openssl.org/source/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz" \ > 'http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/openssl-0.9.8e-fix_manpage…') > -md5sums=('114bf908eb1b293d11d3e6b18a09269f' '04a6a88c2ee4badd4f8649792b73eaf3') > +md5sums=('acf70a16359bf3658bdfb74bda1c4419' '04a6a88c2ee4badd4f8649792b73eaf3') > > build() { > cd $startdir/src/$pkgname-$pkgver > @@ -24,4 +24,4 @@ > make INSTALL_PREFIX=$startdir/pkg MANDIR=/usr/man install > > install -D -m644 LICENSE $startdir/pkg/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/LICENSE > -} > \ No newline at end of file > +} > > _______________________________________________ > arch-commits mailing list > arch-commits(a)archlinux.org > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-commits >

2 1

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.23.1-3
by Tobias Powalowski 20 Oct '07

20 Oct '07

Hi kernel 2.6.23 for both arches in testing, please signoff latest changes from paul and alsa bumped to latest stable version. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

3 4

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] ipw3945
by Tobias Powalowski 20 Oct '07

20 Oct '07

Hi ipw3945 for both arches in testing, please signoff greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

2 2