October 2010 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] packages are newer in extra than in staging
by Allan McRae 03 Oct '10

03 Oct '10

On 03/10/10 09:57, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Ionuț Bîru<ibiru(a)archlinux.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> some packages have been updated in extra and have been mark as done in the >> python todo list but they weren't rebuilt against staging. >> >> looking quick on the list, django (staging removed on 9 september) >> >> extra 1.2.3-1 >> marked as done and nothing in staging. >> >> mercurial >> 1.6.4-1 in extra, 1.6.3-2 in staging >> >> please, check your packages again because i don't intent to fix any of this >> inconsistencies >> >> -- >> Ionuț > > I wrote a script [1] to check for packages in [staging] and > [community-staging] that are not newer than their [core], [extra] and > [community] counterparts. > > So, below are a few more possibly problematic packages. mercurial > isn't included because the ABS tree hasn't been updated with it yet. > > ==> Checking [staging] > denyhosts (2.6-4 isn't newer than 2.6-4 in [extra]) > python-pip (0.8-2 isn't newer than 0.8.1-1 in [extra]) > python-virtualenv (1.4.9-2 isn't newer than 1.5.1-1 in [extra]) > > ==> Checking [community-staging] > cdemu-client (1.2.0-2 isn't newer than 1.3.0-1 in [community]) > griffith (0.11-3 isn't newer than 0.11-3 in [community]) > lilypond (2.12.3-5 isn't newer than 2.12.3-6 in [community]) > openshot (1.2.2-1 isn't newer than 1.2.2-1 in [community]) > python-sphinx (1.0.3-2 isn't newer than 1.0.4-1 in [community]) > recoll (1.13.04-3 isn't newer than 1.14.2-1 in [community]) > trac (0.12-3 isn't newer than 0.12-4 in [community]) > Thanks. I have re-flagged those packages on the TODO list. Everyone, please be careful when updating packages. Either update them in only in the [staging] repo or _both_ the main repo and the staging one. Allan

1 0

[aur-general] Please delete kcm_tablet-svn
by Dany Martineau 03 Oct '10

03 Oct '10

Hi! Please delete kcm_tablet-svn <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38874> (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&L=2&K=danym&O=50&PP=25&SO=a) because it has been replaced with kde-wacomtablet-svn Thanks! -- Dany Martineau Enseignant en mathématiques École secondaire du Harfang 4e et 5e secondaire http://danym.org CSSMI

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] The "Great Python Rebuild of 2010" begins
by Allan McRae 02 Oct '10

02 Oct '10

On 11/09/10 01:10, Allan McRae wrote: > Anyway, the current status is, 1 package remaining for [core] and 69 > remaining for [extra]. There are a few packages flagged as having issues > with the transition, so I will spend my time fixing those. We are down to: [core] - 1 package [extra] - 42 packages [community] - 29 packages Total: 72 packages That is great work by the TUs in the past week to do all those rebuilds in [community]. Can everyone please look at their dashboard and check which of their packages need rebuilt. I would like to move this to [testing]/[community-testing] in the next week or so. Allan

10 14

[aur-general] libdesktop-agnostic building
by Allan McRae 02 Oct '10

02 Oct '10

Hi This package does not build against the current repos so will need fixed by someone before it gets rebuilt for python2. It seems the issues is a newer vala, and the patch will look something like: http://code.google.com/p/pino-twitter/issues/attachmentText?id=309&aid=7997… The only addition needed for building against python2 is to add "export PYTHON=python2" before the ./waf lines. Allan

4 8

[aur-general] Delete request steelstorm-beta
by widomaker2k7＠gmail.com 01 Oct '10

01 Oct '10

Hello, please, can you delete steelstorm-beta (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40716), remplace by steelstorm (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41363) a release is out.

2 3

[aur-general] orphan request: ruby-taglib
by Henning Bekel 01 Oct '10

01 Oct '10

Please orphan ruby-taglib: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12565 The PKGBUILD is broken and the package needs a patch. The maintainer does not respond to comments or email. It's his only package, created in Aug 2007 and never updated. The PKGBUILD misses dependencies, uses the wrong license, installs into hardcoded ruby 1.8 directories, etc. I'd like to adopt it, I have a working package ready which includes a patch for ruby 1.9.x. Regards, Henning

2 2

[aur-general] Dropping python-numeric
by Allan McRae 01 Oct '10

01 Oct '10

python-numeric is old, replaced by python-numpy and has had issues on x86_64 since python-2.5. These issues are far more noticeable in python-2.7 (as in python-numeric just does not work...), so I intend to drop this package from the repos. Two packages in [community] depend on it: freevo, gogh. When python-numeric gets dropped, so will these packages unless their maintainers (or someone else) do something about it. Both look like they can use numpy instead... Allan

2 2