Aur-general November 2012

aur-general@lists.archlinux.org

112 participants
174 discussions

[aur-general] disowning a couple of packages
by Thomas Dziedzic 12 Jan '14

12 Jan '14

Hi, I'm disowning sage-mathematics, sage-mathematics-spkgs(optdepends for sage-mathematics), fityk, and xylib(dependency for fityk). I will move them to the aur in a week if no TU adopts them in community. If you plan on adopting sage-mathematics, you should know that it is currently unbuildable on archlinux, and some other newer distros due to how it is built. It is currently out of date, and you wont be able to update it without fixing this. http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10572 (13 month old bug without recent comments) http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11391 (9 month old bug I filed without a sign of activity) If you plan on adopting fityk, note that it needs a development version of wxwidgets which I statically build in the same PKGBUILD. Cheers.

6 12

[aur-general] Naming convention for Python 2 and 3 apps
by Allen Li 16 Dec '12

16 Dec '12

Hi everybody, I know that the naming convention for python libraries is python(2)-*, but do we have a convention for python applications installed for different python versions? The package in question is flake8, which can be installed for both Python 2 and 3. Allen Li

7 13

[aur-general] [Package Removal Request]
by Diogo Bento 01 Dec '12

01 Dec '12

Greetings, I'd like to ask for the removal of the following AUR packages: lxinput-gtk3: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxinput-gtk3/lxtask-gtk3: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxtask-gtk3/lxterminal-gtk3: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxterminal-gtk3/ Thank you for your attention,D.B. (3V0LU710N) p.s.: [Offtopic] Maybe this is not the right place to ask this, but I'd like to suggest the compilation of lxde packages with gtk3 instead of gtk2... =) [most of them seem to work properly, with the exception of lxterminal, which gives a bug when tabs are closed]. [/Offtopic]

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 Nov '12

30 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-6 (i686) * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-6 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 5 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: a few random packages
by Jekyll Wu 29 Nov '12

29 Nov '12

3 3

[aur-general] Merge request rsibreak-svn ==> rsibreak-git
by Jekyll Wu 29 Nov '12

29 Nov '12

The upstream has switched to git. And the two packages are maintained by the same user. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rsibreak-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rsibreak-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Nov '12

29 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 8 signoffs 2. stephane - 2 signoffs 3. tomegun - 2 signoffs 4. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base and cross-arm-none-eabi-newlib
by Martin Schmölzer 29 Nov '12

29 Nov '12

Hi! I recently adopted and updated the following orphaned packages: - cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils - cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc - cross-arm-none-eabi-gdb Two packages from the cross-arm-none-eabi-* series remain as orphans in the AUR: - cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base - cross-arm-none-eabi-newlib In the past, the cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base package was used to bootstrap the GCC compiler for the ARM EABI target, which is no longer needed [1]. The cross-arm-none-eabi-newlib package was then built using the cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base package, which is no longer needed because my PKGBUILD does a combined source tree build, where the compilation of newlib is integrated with the GCC autotools build. Please remove the no longer needed cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base and cross-arm-none-eabi-newlib packages. Thanks! [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html - section "Building a cross compiler" Best regards, Martin Schmölzer

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: some vala packages
by Jekyll Wu 29 Nov '12

29 Nov '12

All packages below are orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/valaswig/ fail to buid https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/va/valaswig-hg/ fail to build (after suppressing the sed error) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/valabind/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/valabind-hg/ dropped; fail to build by intention Regards Jekyll

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: some gedit packages
by Jekyll Wu 28 Nov '12

28 Nov '12

All packages below are orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-docwordscompletion/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-macro-plugin/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-multi-edit-svn/ svn repo gone https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-markuplanguage-preview/ tarball gone, upstream seems gone too https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/valencia/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vtg/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vtg-devel/ fail to build Regards Jekyll

2 1

Jump to page:

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Aur-general November 2012