=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 8 packages missing signoffs
* 6 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) ==
* catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) ==
* catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25
* catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25
* catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25
* catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25
* shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28
* shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. tomegun - 10 signoffs
2. andyrtr - 4 signoffs
3. dan - 2 signoffs
4. bisson - 1 signoffs
5. pierre - 1 signoffs
In general, should .install files enable systemd service files on
startup by default (even if some custom config may or may not be
required)? Are there any other special considerations when deciding? [1]
provided some info about systemd scripts, but I couldn't find anything
as it relates to PKGBUILDs.
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 8 packages missing signoffs
* 6 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) ==
* catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) ==
* catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25
* catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25
* catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25
* catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25
* shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28
* shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. stephane - 5 signoffs
2. bisson - 4 signoffs
3. foutrelis - 3 signoffs
Hi, I would like the package [kde-servicemenus-meld-menu] to be removed as
I already added a new an improved one under the new name:
kde-servicemenus-meld-menu-extende.
Thanks.