April 2014 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * ibus-pinyin-1.5.0-3 (i686) * ibus-pinyin-1.5.0-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * salt-2014.1.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ibus-pinyin-1.5.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-pinyin-1.5.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] pidgin-libnotify clean up
by Yichao Yu 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

Hi, Please remove pidgin-libnotify-showfix[1] and pidgin-libnotify-getfocus[2]. The fix for both of them are included in the official package right now. Yichao Yu [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pidgin-libnotify-showfix/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pidgin-libnotify-getfocus/

2 1

[aur-general] Oprhan Request: mdocml
by Jesse Adams 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

Please disown the mdocml package. I am in the process of packaging it for several linux distros, starting with ArchLinux. It has not been updated in quite a while. Thanks! Jesse

2 1

[aur-general] please orphan strongswan
by Noel Kuntze 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'd like to have the package "strongswan"[1] orphaned, so I can adopt it, as it has been flagged out-of-date for a month now, has a critical vulnerability[2] and the maintainer didn't react to emails from me. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/strongswan/ [2] http://www.strongswan.org/blog/2014/04/14/strongswan-authentication-bypass-… Regards Noel Kuntze - -- GPG Key id: 0x63EC6658 Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTTtROAAoJEDg5KY9j7GZY7fQP/AubgHD4o3b0ToxBRdb95RJi nUKBfr5MrJ7CbRnQCyh/Ke5IVxPUno8//Cj131NlxUDDeYRqihwl6UQTHf+CWiED 8pa/uX6TOsTi8RbUaNEQ7sF+AkW25pk8u6dBWqEYEgkvl7VEsh9W/87eyma1qX4X wqCFca0y7kX9XKs39SrzzbQtX4NlWMUc3jv8XqB6/7A2uA8UgXmz/XTkFvexFOmL y5k7yrela9lfGN+6WbCeeZ+eDlKWiyIDXFbuicp6w70C9/6uUxLE8wg7wPmbYJXE F56n/bvLTvnhG/3xYp9eKB2kC8hSoNqIiZ5QxPsQG6/6qGHlYqYEjyax474VqOIW 6Ow/JC7QDpABHCb4+rRHkK5GN96PQOe1LXYULac+yiJgXRTXTXBKUaAh3goB9ClH UM8pb/7i9Rjv0wLzwCVEZodrROOf8iFSfl81czVEytQKYs3KKfhf64imKpSkCeXk 9lYvfmYOrR3Dv40hS2vP1UeMXaU5iPcoiYmUwwjoaAWTGHzPhi3bgAxXewlAwBGG PQG2k4QdcEeJj+uAPaIhotjqrET1Ep6Dw36ipQWCNQsFPZeVD0GJEINDKssNEy65 bcau5eiFW9QPM2mYHRyIsTEkxaLRc0Pbl9kl+DzJcgBG1lD+Im3uk+wUO7FbhQ/R NoKGkbs5kP7WjXqT+c99 =3NJ5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Away for a few days
by Alexander Rødseth 16 Apr '14

16 Apr '14

Hi, Feel free to update my packages while I'm on vacation for a few days. I'm back the 20th of April. -- Best regards, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request: php-phpbrew-git
by Francisco Lopes 16 Apr '14

16 Apr '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-phpbrew-git/ I uploaded it with a new name phpbrew-git (sorry, I didn't know I could also ask for a rename). Thank you. Regards, Francisco

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Apr '14

16 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * salt-2014.1.2-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * salt-2014.1.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: libnemesi-git and netembryo-git
by Thomas Glamsch 16 Apr '14

16 Apr '14

Hi *, The packages libnemesi-git[0] and netembryo-git[1] fail to build; apparently the git repo is gone. Moreover, the provided project urls redirect to a domain parking service. I've talked to the original maintainer, and he agreed that the packages should be deleted. [0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libnemesi-git [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/netembryo-git Best regards, Thomas

2 1

[aur-general] Removal of „cloudzec“
by David Eisenmann 16 Apr '14

16 Apr '14

Hi, I'm really sorry about this but by mistake I submitted the package „cloudzec“ instead of „cloudzec-git“. There are still no stable versions of „cloudzec“ and there won't be a stable version the next time, so could you please remove „cloudzec“ from AUR? Link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cloudzec/ Thanks, Dave.

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia 15 Apr '14

15 Apr '14

Please merge ee <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ee/> into ee-editor < https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ee-editor/>. -- http://about.me/palopezv

2 1

[aur-general] Remove linux-lts310
by Alan Orth 15 Apr '14

15 Apr '14

Hi, Please remove linux-lts310. I had created it last year sometime before noticing that [core] had switched linux-lts to 3.10.x. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-lts310 Thanks, -- Alan Orth alan.orth(a)gmail.com http://alaninkenya.org http://mjanja.co.ke "I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone." -Bjarne Stroustrup, inventor of C++ GPG public key ID: 0x8cb0d0acb5cd81ec209c6cdfbd1a0e09c2f836c0

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Apr '14

15 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 5 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (5 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 18 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs 3. thomas - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request: gnome-logs
by Gary van der Merwe 15 Apr '14

15 Apr '14

Hi Please delete gnome-logs. It is now in extra. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-logs Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by John D Jones III 14 Apr '14

14 Apr '14

Please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cw/ I attempted to fix this packages, but to no avail, it does not compile, upstream has not made a release since 2010. Also there is concern that certain core commands, like mount for instance, break horribly resulting in some cases in the system being unable to boot. There is a wiki article: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Color_wrapper that should also be removed since it directly references this broken package and only this package. -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1972(a)gmail.com jnbek1972(a)gmail.com http://zoelife4u.org/

1 1

[aur-general] Disown request: lastpass-pocket
by Chris Down 14 Apr '14

14 Apr '14

I would like to have the (abandoned) package lastpass-pocket[0] disowned so that I can maintain it. The maintainer has not responded to multiple requests to update the PKGBUILD and has left the package broken for almost an entire month now. Thanks. :-) 0: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lastpass-pocket

2 2

[aur-general] Orphan request: syncmaildir
by Thomas Jost 14 Apr '14

14 Apr '14

Hello world, syncmaildir (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syncmaildir/) has been flagged out of date for a long time. I've tried to contact its current maintainer by e-mail on March 20th, but got no answer. No activity on this package for more than 18 months, no activity on the maintainer's other AUR packages for more than a year. Could a TU please disown syncmaildir so I can adopt it and update it? Thanks! Cheers, -- Thomas/Schnouki

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Apr '14

14 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 9 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 33 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (9 total) == * cinnamon-translations-2.2.0-1 (any) * cinnamon-2.2.1-1 (i686) * cinnamon-screensaver-2.2.0-1 (i686) * nemo-2.2.0-1 (i686) * nemo-extensions-2.2.0-1 (i686) * cinnamon-2.2.1-1 (x86_64) * cinnamon-screensaver-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) * nemo-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) * nemo-extensions-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (30 total) == * cinnamon-translations-2.2.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-2.2.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-desktop-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-screensaver-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-session-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.0.8-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cjs-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.12.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.12.0.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * muffin-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nemo-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nemo-extensions-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-2.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-desktop-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-screensaver-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-session-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.0.8-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cjs-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.12.0.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * muffin-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemo-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemo-extensions-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (3 total) == * python2-polib-1.0.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-menus-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-menus-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. ronald - 1 signoffs 2. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] My absence
by Piotr Rogoża 14 Apr '14

14 Apr '14

Hello Since 20.04.2014 I'm changing work and place of residence. Therefore, I can be unapproachable for a few months. If this will be necessary then you can disown my packages. -- Best regards Piotr Rogoża

1 0

[aur-general] Delete Request: syncany-bzr
by Armin Fisslthaler 14 Apr '14

14 Apr '14

Hello, please remove syncany-bzr [0], the project moved to git, a new package has been created here [1] [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syncany-bzr/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/syncany-git/ Regards, Armin

2 1

[aur-general] Disown requests: ceceron's packages
by Jerome Leclanche 13 Apr '14

13 Apr '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=ceceron&SeB=m) Neither of them has been updated in years despite both being OOD. Cheers J. Leclanche

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request of pywapi
by willemw 13 Apr '14

13 Apr '14

Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pywapi/ and please move the votes to the renamed package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pywapi/. Willem

2 1

[aur-general] Requst remove libdvdnav-videolan-gi and libdvdread-videolan-git
by SpinFlo 13 Apr '14

13 Apr '14

please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libdvdnav-videolan-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libdvdread-videolan-git/ this fork is now official repository (see http://dvdnav.mplayerhq.hu/) greetings

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request livescript to nodejs-livescript
by Lance Chen 13 Apr '14

13 Apr '14

Hello TUs, Please merge livescript into nodejs-livescript, since the latter one make it clearer that it is a nodejs package. Thank you very much. livescript: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/livescript/ nodejs-livescript: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nodejs-livescript/ Cheers, Lance Chen

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Apr '14

13 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 15 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 32 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (15 total) == * cinnamon-2.2.0-1 (i686) * cinnamon-desktop-2.2.0-1 (i686) * cinnamon-session-2.2.0-1 (i686) * cjs-2.2.0-1 (i686) * gnome-packagekit-3.12.1-1 (i686) * muffin-2.2.0-1 (i686) * cinnamon-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) * cinnamon-desktop-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) * cinnamon-session-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) * cjs-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) * gnome-packagekit-3.12.1-1 (x86_64) * muffin-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) * python2-polib-1.0.3-1 (any) * cinnamon-menus-2.2.0-1 (i686) * cinnamon-menus-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (29 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-desktop-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-session-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.0.8-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cjs-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * freerdp-1.0.2-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.12.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.12.0.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-2.6.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * muffin-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nemo-extensions-2.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-desktop-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-session-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.0.8-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cjs-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * freerdp-1.0.2-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.12.0.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * muffin-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemo-extensions-2.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (3 total) == * python2-polib-1.0.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-menus-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-menus-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 19 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request: bluecurve-cursor-theme
by Jerome Leclanche 13 Apr '14

13 Apr '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bluecurve-cursor-theme/ Dupe of community/xcursor-bluecurve J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] package deletion request my-little-investigation
by Matthias Devlamynck 13 Apr '14

13 Apr '14

Hi, I've created a package named "my-little-investigation" and some time after noticed that the project is named "my-little-investigations" with an "s". My bad. So anyone can delete this package to avoid the duplicate ? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/my-little-investigation/ With thanks, Matthias Devlamynck

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: aqualung-alsa
by Rob McCathie 13 Apr '14

13 Apr '14

Hi TU's & list, I'm the original submitter of aqualung-alsa. Nowadays i'm the maintainer of aqualung and aqualung-svn too. aqualung-alsa can be deleted. For now people should be using the SVN package anyway, within which i've left a commented out alternate ./configure line in the PKGBUILD, for people who want to force only ALSA. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aqualung-alsa/ Thanks & regards, Rob McCathie

2 1

[aur-general] Moving ogle from [community] to AUR
by Alexander Rødseth 12 Apr '14

12 Apr '14

ogle is a DVD player application. It currently does not build, it was recently moved from [extra] to [community] out of lack of interest and it has not seen a release since 2003. Moving to AUR. -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request
by sxe 12 Apr '14

12 Apr '14

Kuickshow is officially unmaintained now and the SVN repository is gone. Please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kuickshow-svn/ Thanks, Andy

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: raspberry-gpio-python
by Jakub Klinkovský 12 Apr '14

12 Apr '14

Please merge raspberry-gpio-python [1] into python2-raspberry-gpio [2] (somewhat requested in the comments, both packages are of the same maintainer). [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/raspberry-gpio-python [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-raspberry-gpio Regards, -- jlk

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Apr '14

12 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.0.8-6 (i686) * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (i686) * cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.0.8-6 (x86_64) * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (25 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-2.0.14-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-session-2.0.6-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.0.8-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * freerdp-1.0.2-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.12.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.12.0.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-2.6.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * muffin-2.0.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nemo-extensions-2.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-2.0.14-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-session-2.0.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.0.8-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * freerdp-1.0.2-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.12.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.12.0.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * muffin-2.0.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemo-extensions-2.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 6 signoffs 2. fyan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request: qterminal-git
by Jerome Leclanche 12 Apr '14

12 Apr '14

Hi I maintain the LXQt packages already and I'd like to ask for qterminal-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qterminal-git/ The package hasn't been updated in exactly one year, despite three requests in the comments. Maintainer doesn't seem to have been active in several months either. J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request gnome-shell-theme-frieze
by Joost Bremmer 11 Apr '14

11 Apr '14

I understand this is the place to go to get packages removed, in which case I'd like to suggest deleting gnome-shell-theme-frieze [1]. I adopted this package about a year ago but there have been no updates to the theme since Gnome 3.6. Since we're soon heading to 3.12 I think it's safe to say everyone involved has moved on to other things. Thanks in advance, Joost Bremmer [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-frieze/ Toost Inc. "We apologize for the inconvenience"

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Apr '14

11 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 18 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 23 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (18 total) == * cinnamon-2.0.14-4 (i686) * cinnamon-session-2.0.6-3 (i686) * cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.0.8-5 (i686) * emerillon-0.1.90-6 (i686) * gnome-packagekit-3.12.0-1 (i686) * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.12.0.1-1 (i686) * mongodb-2.6.0-1 (i686) * muffin-2.0.5-3 (i686) * nemo-extensions-2.0.0-4 (i686) * cinnamon-2.0.14-4 (x86_64) * cinnamon-session-2.0.6-3 (x86_64) * cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.0.8-5 (x86_64) * emerillon-0.1.90-6 (x86_64) * gnome-packagekit-3.12.0-1 (x86_64) * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.12.0.1-1 (x86_64) * mongodb-2.6.0-1 (x86_64) * muffin-2.0.5-3 (x86_64) * nemo-extensions-2.0.0-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (23 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-2.0.14-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-session-2.0.6-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.0.8-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * freerdp-1.0.2-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.12.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.12.0.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-2.6.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * muffin-2.0.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nemo-extensions-2.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-2.0.14-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-session-2.0.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-settings-daemon-2.0.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * freerdp-1.0.2-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.12.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.12.0.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * muffin-2.0.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemo-extensions-2.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 6 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Merge Request] trayfreq-fr -> trayfreq-archlinux
by David Phillips 11 Apr '14

11 Apr '14

Hi, please merge [1] into [2] as [2] now provides the features of [1] so there's no need for the patched version, [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq-fr/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq-archlinux/ Cheers -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal Request] python2-pybitcointools
by Andy Weidenbaum 11 Apr '14

11 Apr '14

This package has been renamed upstream to python2-bitcoin.

2 1

[aur-general] iou-web-git
by Артём 11 Apr '14

11 Apr '14

Hello I maintainer iou-web-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iou-web-git/) I ask you to please remove the package iou-web-git, as a program developer removed git repository and package later does not work.

3 2

[aur-general] Packaging a Ruby application (veewee) with embedded gems (no dependency on Arch ruby-* packages)
by Bertrand Bonnefoy-Claudet 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

Hello, veewee [1] is a great tool for building vagrant boxes. Unfortunately, it depends on many other gems. I've already built a package ruby-veewee [2] using Arch packages as dependencies and there is a git version, veewee-git [3], but I find them unsatisfactory because of how difficult they are to package with the right version for each gem. vagrant has recently been accepted in community and has a PKGBUILD that I find peculiar. It seems like it uses some embedded directory to store gems it depends on. Sorry, I'm not very familiar with Ruby and gems. What I would like to achieve is similar. How can I package veewee-git so that required gems are built to and loaded from /opt/veewee/gems ? I have tried several combinations with "gem install" and bundler but without success. Thanks, [1] https://github.com/jedi4ever/veewee [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-veewee/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/veewee-git/ -- Bertrand

3 2

[aur-general] Removal of package
by James Bulmer 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

As requested a few days ago, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-cinderclient-deb/ needs removing as we have moved to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-cinderclient/ Thanks! -- James

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 5 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * freerdp-1.0.2-5 (i686) * freerdp-1.0.2-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (5 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * freerdp-1.0.2-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * freerdp-1.0.2-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 7 signoffs 2. bluewind - 1 signoffs 3. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] GHC 7.8.1 packaging decisions for Arch Linux
by Daniel Micay 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

On 09/04/14 11:12 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 10/04/14 12:58, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Magnus Therning <magnus(a)therning.org>wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm guessing this means cabal-install now is the only package outside >>>> of [community] that uses ghc to build. Is that right? >>>> >> That would be correct. >> >> >>>> Is the plan then that any future tools (i.e. non-libraries) >>>> implemented in Haskell would go into [community]? >> >> This would also be correct. I believe that most people who use packages in >> our supported repos don't actually use the haskell libraries themselves, >> but rather the tools that depend on them. (e.g. xmonad) >> I am not against keeping these tools around and their dependencies if >> someone wants to maintain them, but I personally have no interest in >> maintaining them myself. > > I am fine with this decision. Although I think it better to use a > system package manager if at all possible, I do recognise that this > takes man power that we do not have for haskell. People still have the > option of using the AUR over cabal-install if they want to use the > package manager (or system wide installs - is cabal-install a per user > thing?) > > <aside> > In my ideal situation, we would have a team of people for each of the > "major" programming languages who would determine packaging policy and > provide packages for many of the libraries for that language. Sort of > like how we have multiple people who deal with KDE and GNOME updates. > With a team based setup, it would be easier to have more junior people > brought on to help. > </aside> > > Now that aside is finished, what is the deal with that arch-haskell > group? Is it still going? Would they want to provide packages > officially instead? It's definitely still active. They seem to have all the necessary automation worked out. AFAICT they do an automated conversion from the cabal files and maintain a set of patches for adding external dependencies, etc. https://github.com/archhaskell

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] GHC 7.8.1 packaging decisions for Arch Linux
by Thomas Dziedzic 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Allan McRae <allan(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > > Now that aside is finished, what is the deal with that arch-haskell > group? Is it still going? Would they want to provide packages > officially instead? I wouldn't actually be opposed to this idea. A lot of effort is duplicated with regards to Archlinux's official haskell packages and Arch-Haskell's packages. We could try to work out something between the existing haskell package maintainers and arch-haskell maintainers. It might lead to a possibly better overall haskell experience on archlinux. Arch-haskell could maintain official haskell packages using pacman. I (and anyone interested) could support haskell package installation using the cabal-install route.

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by G. Schlisio 10 Apr '14

10 Apr '14

please delete [0] as it does not compile, is orphan and the project is discontinued. as a replacement [1] is available. thanks [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fusecompress/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fusecompress-git/

3 3

[aur-general] Deletion of aur package 'shell'
by Ricardo Band 09 Apr '14

09 Apr '14

Ahoi, I've added the package shell[1] to the AUR some time ago. Now I found out that the idea behind this little python script can be achived with normal ssh tools. I don't think the package is useful for anyone so it can safely be deleted. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/shell/ -- Greetings

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Apr '14

09 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thestinger - 9 signoffs 2. anatolik - 2 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Removal request] kde4support-git
by A Rojas 09 Apr '14

09 Apr '14

Replaced with kdelibs4support-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde4support-git/ Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Jerome Leclanche 08 Apr '14

08 Apr '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-wikipedia-rewrite-svn/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pywikibot-git/ Cheers. J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] libechonest merge request
by Kuba Serafinowski 08 Apr '14

08 Apr '14

Hi, Please merge libechonest2* into libechonest**. I'm the maintainer of both of them. Cheers, Kuba * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libechonest2/ ** https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libechonest/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Apr '14

08 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 19 signoffs 2. bisson - 2 signoffs 3. dan - 2 signoffs 4. seblu - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Merge Request] brother-dcp*-{cupswrapper,lpr}
by Berno Strik 08 Apr '14

08 Apr '14

2 1

[aur-general] [Merge Request] brother-dcp7060d-{cupswrapper,lpr}
by Berno Strik 08 Apr '14

08 Apr '14

Please merge [1] and [2] into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-dcp7060d [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-dcp7060d-cupswrapper [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-dcp7060d-lpr With regards

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Daniele Formichelli 07 Apr '14

07 Apr '14

Hi, I've uploaded two packages with the wrong name and now I have uploaded the correct ones. Please can you delete xcursors-bridge ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xcursors-bridge/) and xcursors-perspective ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xcursors-perspective/)? Regards, Daniele

2 1

[aur-general] Drop Ubuntu One packages from [community]
by Balló György 07 Apr '14

07 Apr '14

Hi, I orphaned the following packages in the [community] repository, and I'll drop them to AUR in the next weeks, because Ubuntu One service will be discontinued on 1 June 2014 [1]: - python2-configglue - python2-dirspec - python2-ubuntuone-storageprotocol - ubuntuone-client - ubuntuone-control-panel - ubuntu-sso-client [1] http://voices.canonical.com/ubuntuone/2014/04/02/shutting-down-ubuntu-one-f… -- György Balló Trusted User

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: ttf-sudanese-unicode
by Andy Ross 07 Apr '14

07 Apr '14

I just uploaded a pkgbuild for a new font, ttf-sundanese-unicode. However on my first attempt I misspelled the name, so there is currently a useless pkgbuild called ttf-sudanese-unicode (missing first 'n'). Could we merge these two so as to get rid of the useless duplicate? Thanks, foolishgrunt

2 1

[aur-general] Remove packages
by James Bulmer 07 Apr '14

07 Apr '14

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by James Bulmer 07 Apr '14

07 Apr '14

Could https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient-deb/ be removed as I have moved all of the dependency's to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient/ Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Openstack discussion
by James Bulmer 07 Apr '14

07 Apr '14

Hi all, Openstack is a collection of projects aimed at providing a opensource solution to cloud infrastructure deployment and management, It's similar to products such as Proxmox, Virt-manager and Vmware. The projects that contribute to Openstack are tightly linked through a set of API's, and like most projects these API's change as newer versions are released You will find most of the Openstack packages in the AUR, but no one has followed a set naming scheme so the packages are from different incompatible branches. Deploying Openstack from the AUR is not achievable at this point in time due to this A number of maintainers and users have noticed the issue, I have created this email to highlight the issue and kick start a discussion to solve it. Lance0312 has suggested using the raw package name (nova, glance, kesytone ect) for the stable (currently havana) branch, and appending -dev to all development branches (currently ice-house) Another issue is the lack of information in the Wiki relating to Openstack, due to this Lance0312 has created https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OpenStack (yet to be populated) Regards -- James aka nekinie

2 1

[aur-general] maintain an orphan package
by arnaud gaboury 07 Apr '14

07 Apr '14

I needed to install on my server rstudio-sever[1]. Looking at the AUR repository, I found one orphan rstudio-server-git package. I used this one as a base to build/install the package on my server. As everything went smooth, I decided to adopt the package[2]. I downloaded the tarball and $ makepkg -i , to ensure everything is OK. The PKGBUILD file in the tarball is mine, with the correct commands, but the "view PKGBUILD" action is still showing the PKGBUILD from the old owner. Is there a reason for this behavior ? Did I miss something when uploading my pkg ? The "submitter" is still to NONE in the package detail, why ? TY for advice. [1]http://www.rstudio.com/ide/download/server.html [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rstudio-server-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Remove package
by James Bulmer 07 Apr '14

07 Apr '14

Could https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-neutronclient-deb/ be removed as I have moved all of the dependency's to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-neutronclient/ Thanks -- James

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by James Bulmer 07 Apr '14

07 Apr '14

I propose that https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf-deb/ should be deleted as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf/ replaces it and that https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslo-messaging-deb/ should be deleted as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslo-messaging/ replaces it Thanks -- James

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: vcmi-svn -> vcmi-git
by Raziel23 07 Apr '14

07 Apr '14

Hi, Please merge vcmi-svn [1] into vcmi-git [2], because the project development has shifted from SVN to Git. Best regards. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vcmi-svn [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vcmi-git

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 Apr '14

07 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 Apr '14

06 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 5 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Merge Request] brother-mfc5890cn-{cupswrapper,lpr}
by Berno Strik 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

Please merge [1] and [2] into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-5890cn [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-cups-wrapper-mfc-5890cn [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-lpr-mfc-5890cn

2 1

[aur-general] [removal request] - linux-sun7i and sunxi-tools
by sehraf 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

Hi, please remove linux-sun7i [1] and sunxi-tools [2] because: - both are outdated and orphaned - linux-sun7i is provided by Arch Linux ARM [3] - sunxi-tools is a duplication of sunxi-tools-git [4] Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-sun7i/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunxi-tools/ [3] https://github.com/archlinuxarm/PKGBUILDs/tree/master/core/linux-sun7i [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sunxi-tools-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Remove some xf86-video-intel-* packages
by Karol Blazewicz 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

1. According to the comments, xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 is just a duplicate of xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git. It has been orphaned. The only difference in PKGBUILDs (apart from the package name) is that xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 has 2 extra makedependencies: git and xorg-util-macros. At least git shold be added to the makedepends (as pointed out in the comments of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git/ by klusark - the user who uploaded xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 - but I think xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2 should be removed. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-xwayland-git2/ 2. Are we OK with a package like https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-conf-sna/ that provides only a 5-line config: Section "Device" Identifier "Intel Graphics" Driver "intel" Option "AccelMethod" "sna" EndSection It's an orphan with no votes and no comments.

2 2

[aur-general] [removal request] Please remove tntdb-svn from AUR
by Jonas Platte 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

Hello, please remove tntdb-svn [1] from AUR as it's source has moved to GitHub (see [2]) Thanks, Jonas Platte [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tntdb-svn/ [2] http://www.tntnet.org/development.html

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request - redirfs package cleanup
by WorMzy Tykashi 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

Hi TUs, Please could you remove the following packages: redirfs-bin [1] and redirfs-lib [2]. Neither have been updated since 2009, and both have no maintainer, any votes, and depend a non-existent redirfs-modules package. Cheers, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redirfs-bin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redirfs-lib/

2 1

[aur-general] [Disownment Request] brother-mfc-295cn
by Berno Strik 05 Apr '14

05 Apr '14

Please disown [1] so that I can take over. I've contacted the maintainer but he did not respond. (See bottom of this mail). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-295cn From: Berno Strik <dutchman55(a)gmx.com> To: aarcila(a)marketext.com Subject: AUR package brother-mfc-295cn Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:54:32 +0100 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Are you willing to disown this package so that I can fix it? -- With regards, Berno Strik <dutchman55(a)gmx.com>

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] Request: PKGBUILD removal of (sysdig|sysdig-git)
by Martti Kühne 04 Apr '14

04 Apr '14

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:59 PM, <scimmia(a)archlinux.info> wrote: > On 2014-04-04 07:46, Borja wrote: >> >> Hi chaps! >> >> I would like to requestthe removal the one of this two PKGBUILD: >> >> - sysdig >> - sysdig-git >> >> I've comitted both of them by mistake. I would say that maybe it's better >> to >> keep sysdig? Or maybe guys you think it's better to keep sysdig-git just >> in >> case the people from Draios Inc. will add support to Arch to their >> installer? >> >> Cheers! >> >> >> ================================================================================= >> >> GPG key ID 4CA6E08B -- https://www.libcrack.so/ > > > I believe you wanted the aur-general mailing list, not arch-general. CCing to aur-general for completeness. cheers! mar77i

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: openspades-data
by Shohei Kusakata 04 Apr '14

04 Apr '14

Hello, Please delete this package: openspades-data https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades-data/ because I intergrated the package into openspades (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades/) Thank you.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Apr '14

04 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Package Deletion
by Josh Klar 04 Apr '14

04 Apr '14

I'd like to request my package dmenu-xy be deleted - it's been out of date for somewhere around a year and a half and someone already updated the patchset to 4.5 and merged it into dmenu-patchy (which I've been using for quite a while now myself). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dmenu-xy Thanks! -- Josh Klar <j(a)iv597.com>

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Ivaylo Kuzev 03 Apr '14

03 Apr '14

Hi, The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2]. Please remove [1]. [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-xft/[1] [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-git/[2] -- Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Apr '14

03 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * cantata-1.3.3-1 (i686) * cantata-1.3.3-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 3 signoffs 2. thomas - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package Deletions
by John D Jones III 03 Apr '14

03 Apr '14

Please delete the following pkgbuilds, they are provided by packages in Extra: perl-qt4: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-qt4/ it is a duplicate of the Extra pkg: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/kdebindings-perlqt/ perl-alien-smoke-qt: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-alien-smoke-qt/ it attempts to build and provide the same things as the Extra pkg: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/kdebindings-smokeqt/ They provide the same files and modules. Both are brutally out of date and my packages. No need to have them in AUR, they are also not required by other packages. -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1972(a)gmail.com jnbek1972(a)gmail.com http://zoelife4u.org/

2 1

[aur-general] [Package renaming] firefox-extension-add-to-search-bar
by chdorb 02 Apr '14

02 Apr '14

I've uploaded firefox-extension-add-to-search-bar, please merge it with firefox-add-to-search-bar and then delete the old one.

2 2

[aur-general] Disown Diego's packages
by WorMzy Tykashi 02 Apr '14

02 Apr '14

Hi TUs, I've got a bit of a strange request this time. AUR user "Diego" [1] has been inactive and unresponsive [2] for a while now. His last post to the mailing list was in September [3], and he hasn't responded to a query I sent two weeks ago R.E. the slimlock package [4]. Therefore, I am requesting that all of his packages [5] be disowned (possibly after a two week grace period to give him a chance to respond -- I've CC'd him in). I would also like to request that [4] be disowned now, so I can update it. I'm hoping he does respond, if only to confirm that he's inactive; casual stalking shows that he hasn't updated his g+ or youtube in a while either, which is worrying.. Cheers, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Diego [2a] https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-January/026717.html [2b] https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-February/027148.ht… [3] https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-September/025197.h… [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/slimlock/ [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=m&K=diego

2 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Apr '14

02 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 12 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (12 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (i686) * bbswitch-0.8-7 (i686) * r8168-8.038.00-2 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (i686) * vhba-module-20130607-25 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (i686) * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (x86_64) * bbswitch-0.8-7 (x86_64) * r8168-8.038.00-2 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20130607-25 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.038.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 8 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 1 signoffs 3. bluewind - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Delete Request] libupstart gmock-make
by Charles Bos 02 Apr '14

02 Apr '14

Hello, Could the following packages be deleted please: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libupstart/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gmock-make/ I created them to try and satisfy some Unity dependencies but I've got patches now which solve the issues better so these two packages are now useless. Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Please disown b2sum
by Michael Düll 02 Apr '14

02 Apr '14

Hi! Please disown b2sum [1] as user has not updated the package for over 12 months now. I'd like to adopt and update it. Thanks, Michael Düll [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/b2sum/

2 1

[aur-general] April Fools' Day jokes in AUR
by Lukas Jirkovsky 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

I feel that this PKGBUILD needs to be preserved for future generations after it has been deleted from AUR: pkgname=secure-certificates pkgver=0 pkgrel=0 pkgdesc="Trust no one" arch=(any) license=('WTFPL') url=('https://127.0.0.1') conflicts=('ca-certificates') provides=('ca-certificates') build() { echo "diy or die!" } package() { echo "nothing to do here too" }

3 2

[aur-general] [Merge Request] trayfreq -> trayfreq-archlinux
by David Phillips 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

I maintain [1] and have decided to move it to follow my fork as the original source isn't compatible with Archlinux any more. Could I please have [1] merged into [2]? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq-archlinux/ Cheers, all the best. -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B

2 3

[aur-general] Compiz 0.9 packages cleanup, mergers?
by Charles Bos 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

There are a great deal of orphaned Compiz 0.9 packages in the AUR, some for the stable releases and some for bazaar. They are all on around 0.9.5 or 0.9.7. These are the packages I'm referring to: for stable release: * ccsm-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ccsm-dev/ * compiz-plugins-extra-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... extra-dev/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-plugins-extra-dev/> * compiz-plugins-main-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... -main-dev/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-plugins-main-dev/> * compizconfig-backend-gconf-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... gconf-dev/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compizconfig-backend-gconf-dev/> * compizconfig-backend-gsettings-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... tings-dev/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compizconfig-backend-gsettings-dev/> * compizconfig-python-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... ython-dev/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compizconfig-python-dev/> * libcompizconfig-dev -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcompizconfig-dev/ for development release: * ccsm-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ccsm-bzr/ * compiz-core-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-core-bzr/ * compiz-plugins-extra-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... extra-bzr/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-plugins-extra-bzr/> * compiz-plugins-main-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... -main-bzr/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-plugins-main-bzr/> * compizconfig-backend-gconf-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... gconf-bzr/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compizconfig-backend-gconf-bzr/> * compizconfig-backend-gsettings-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... tings-bzr/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compizconfig-backend-gsettings-bzr/> * compizconfig-python-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/comp ... ython-bzr/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compizconfig-python-bzr/> * libcompizconfig-bzr -- https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcompizconfig-bzr/ As I understand it, Compiz upstream no longer packages all these components separately. They are all developed and packaged together in one launchpad project. That is why we have two main packages in the AUR for installing Compiz 0.9, compiz-dev and compiz-bzr. I've had a look on launchpad and this seems to be the case. For instance: The compiz-ccsm page (https://launchpad.net/compiz-ccsm) lists 0.9.5.92 as the latest version when it's actually 0.9.10. Therefore (unless I am much mistaken) all the packages above are obsolete and can never be updated to their latest upstream versions. I propose that all the dev packages above be merged with compiz-dev (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-dev/) and all the bazaar packages be merged with compiz-bzr (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-bzr/)

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mldonkey-3.1.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rethinkdb-1.12.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-0.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mldonkey-3.1.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rethinkdb-1.12.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Delete proposal: asus-screen-brightness
by Jerome Leclanche 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/asus-screen-brightness/ - The entirety code is stored in the source package - It's just a bash file and a system service file (which is not useful) - xorg-xbacklight provides the same functionality without requiring root. That said it's referenced in the wiki as an alternative to xorg-xbacklight which I... don't quite get. J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] [compiz] Merge request
by Florian Dejonckheere 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

Hi Please merge compiz [1] into compiz-core [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-core/ Thanks Florian

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request
by Jerome Leclanche 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-input-synaptics-jumpycursor/ No longer needed (cf comments) J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: gnome-terminal-dark
by Gary van der Merwe 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

Please delete gnome-terminal-dark. There is now a preference to do this.

2 1

[aur-general] [Rename Request] bitcoind to bitcoin-core
by Andy Weidenbaum 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

I think bitcoin-core is more descriptive than bitcoind. The package provides a headless P2P node without wallet functionality (core). A growing number of Bitcoin server applications depend on Bitcoin core running as a service. Package includes systemd service file.

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: lxqt-power-git
by Jerome Leclanche 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxqt-power-git/ Can safely delete or merge into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxqt-powermanagement-git/ - functionality has been merged into the one app. J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: python-pygraphviz -> python2-pygraphviz
by Clément Démoulins 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

Hi, To follow the python guidelines, could you please merge python-pygraphviz [1] into python2-pygraphviz [2]. Thanks. Clément Démoulins [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pygraphviz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pygraphviz/ -- Clef PGP : 0xDD51E028

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal Request] stm32flash-svn
by Stephen Zhang 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

Hi, everyone. I hope the package stm32flash-svn in AUR can be removed. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stm32flash-svn/ The package was orphan, and I adopted it. but now, I have made two new packages (stm32flash-git and stm32flash) to replace it. So, it's unnecessary to keep stm32flash-svn in AUR. Regards, Stephen.

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request:scid_vs_pc
by Martin Doege 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

Hi! Please disown scid_vs_pc https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/scid_vs_pc/ I've sent an email to the maintainer but not received a reply. Thanks! Martin

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Disownment Request: kdeplasma-applets-redshift
by thecattony＠gmx.com 01 Apr '14

01 Apr '14

Hi, any news about this? Still no response from the actual maintainer. Regards.

2 1