April 2014 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] [delete request]
by Berno Strik 19 Apr '14

19 Apr '14

Please can you Delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firebirdsql Its successor is https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-firebirdsql With regards

2 1

[aur-general] [merge request] [Delete request] firebird rdbms
by Berno Strik 18 Apr '14

18 Apr '14

Can you please Merge [1] and [2] into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firebird-classicserver Delete [3],[4] and [5] their function is taken over by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firebird-superserver [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firebird-classic [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firebird-cs [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firebird-ss [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firebird-ss-213 [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firebird-superclassic With regards

2 1

[aur-general] Qt4 / Qt5 package naming
by Jerome Leclanche 18 Apr '14

18 Apr '14

Hi With Qt5 becoming more and more available throughout Qt apps (especially as KDE progresses into the switch), I think it's time to consider adopting an updated naming scheme. IMHO: - Qt4 apps should use the -qt4 suffix - Qt5 apps should not use any suffix or prefix - Qt libraries should probably use a qt- prefix. (eg what is currently qt5-base, qt5-doc etc should become qt-base, qt-location). Or alternatively, no prefix at all and use upstream naming scheme (qtbase, qtlocation, ...) Thoughts? J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Apr '14

18 Apr '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * salt-2014.1.3-1 (any) * ibus-pinyin-1.5.0-4 (i686) * pidgin-lwqq-0.2d.20140417-1 (i686) * ibus-pinyin-1.5.0-4 (x86_64) * pidgin-lwqq-0.2d.20140417-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * salt-2014.1.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ibus-pinyin-1.5.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pidgin-lwqq-0.2d.20140417-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cantata-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-pinyin-1.5.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pidgin-lwqq-0.2d.20140417-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-msgpack-0.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Merging a few packages
by Ofir Balas 18 Apr '14

18 Apr '14

Hey guys, Can I get the following packages merged into their new names: mezzanine -> python2-mezzanine django-grappelli-safe -> python2-grappelli-safe django-filebrowser-safe -> python2-django-filebrowser-safe All packages obviously owned by myself. Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Please disown invada-studio-plugins-lv2
by Rob Til Freedmen 18 Apr '14

18 Apr '14

I've requested an update for confirmed bugs and a fix from FalkTX for the lv2 spec a year ago. Two month's later a bazaar branch was created by FalkTX - ever since available by ubuntu users... https://code.launchpad.net/~shanipribadi/invada-studio/fixes Another comment requested an update... Is it to much to exspect at least a comment? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/invada-studio-plugins-lv2/

2 3

[aur-general] pkg deletion request
by flower_of_life＠gmx.net 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

Hi, I would ask for following pks to be deleted: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde-servicemenus-makepkg-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde-servicemenus-repo-management-git/ Reason: I have merged the two sources into one git repo and would like to supply a new src pkg pulling from new git repo Thanks in advance

4 5

Re: [aur-general] GNOME Boxes in [community] now
by ed 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear all, As GNOME Boxes is now in community, I don't think there is a need for https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-boxes/ or https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-boxes-git/, as the current maintainer can I request deletion for both? elken -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTTkXRAAoJEAyNrQkPQJPRv4wQALl2mcpYXSWwLeUh/heTZe8A RvwA2efml3gkOIbagLfo9WO6J4nL8fipWTXEwrfUJWX7v+SmWc60D0vfdkFSViQB 7F/fy5ZRgaXMGw1R4AAkivZIYx+dD3t4K1zjR6WNNoRmJ3lO6hXaDCb/IBmYrXtu RzRMz0c/A8n78gAgkyTG2FWmpbJvTp9yVEOaytMTUpLQxsJ+PLRy953L7xGBoHj/ skIObKxS4hy+8GrcciEMuQHz+a3kxOgcU5vKSr3SjYGcNLbxXYcrAgvDkKmWE960 UY8XVgU0hCODc0i4bmhVxHZPzyfZX9kZSRWKymg0gPgagJWPAQDV5SQCGZiKW+eH jWB/scfcaIQZKZSM4i3t/4BVqfGOBYJ1jlswnaPjtvvaWqWLKC3yRc1lfOHTZFGd y00eWqIPveSP+A+RO8PnkbQXv2EMYdLTG3hebgrRjBD3wVQla9EOqInIdhbebs4y WBdrXO9wRqYJZbZqslL6fdCcO47qIylrIEwgFnQxn19U07SqQFgpozTrLg9e3Hsw h4q0GQAnVStfV/fevwAIwP6RkgWBOnXG2KPetW2EIrbKwAeSN7093mJXd1LKNStK gnebtDlG1ZwbsBo2gTzB31Q4+SBA+DjOelAlnBQAMEvHOfRY+2Kw/hbGNhwjK47v wKTDNoXB0wEHug3K2mPc =leVc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 4

[aur-general] Delete requests
by Anton Larionov 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

Hi, Please deleted following packages from AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opencaesar3-git/ Development was moved to CaesarIA project (caesaria-git package). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/caesaria-bin/ Upstream now provides only source code. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpd-cue/ Mpd now supports cue out-of-box. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpd-devel/ Doesn't need anymore because extra now contains latest version and there is no difference between stable and devel. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpc-dev/ Same as previous item. -- Regards, Anton Larionov

2 1

[aur-general] delete request: qbankmanager
by G. Schlisio 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

qbankmanager [0] is discontinued since 2011, orphan and does not build with aqbanking >= 5.0.0 , please delete it. thanks [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qbankmanager/

2 1