Hi,
While browsing AUR4 orphaned pacakges, i noticed cudahashcat with
description "Worlds fastest password cracker with dictionary mutation
engine" .
There are atleast 2 more packages from the same upstream,
http://hashcat.net/oclhashcat/ .
I realise it and can be useful for people that forgot their own
password, there are many illegal/immoral uses for it.
Should we allow such programs in AUR ?
LVV
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On one of my packages [0], I've updated the PKGBUILD with pkgver 1.4.20.
Previous release was 1.4.18.
However, AUR(4) still seems to think the package version is 1.4.18, and
even seems to apply it to when I use the ${pkgver} variable inline (e.g.
for the sources).
What gives? Is anyone else experiencing this?
[0] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/freeswitch/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=t1hi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 3 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) ==
* lightdm-1:1.14.0-4 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* lightdm-1:1.14.0-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* wireshark-1.12.6-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. anatolik - 1 signoffs
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 1 new package in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 3 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) ==
* wireshark-1.12.6-1 (x86_64)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) ==
* lightdm-1:1.14.0-4 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* lightdm-1:1.14.0-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* wireshark-1.12.6-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==
* lightdm-1:1.14.0-4 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* lightdm-1:1.14.0-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. eworm - 2 signoffs
2. bisson - 2 signoffs
3. foutrelis - 1 signoffs
4. anatolik - 1 signoffs