September 2015 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Sep '15

24 Sep '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 33 packages missing signoffs * 12 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (33 total) == * cimg-1.6.5-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-ioflo-1.3.9-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * salt-2015.8.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * sopel-6.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * wammu-0.39-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-23 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-37 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-lts-0.8-12 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.36.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.040.00-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-18 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * weston-1.9.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-23 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-37 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-lts-0.8-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gammu-1.36.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.040.00-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * weston-1.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (12 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * r8168-8.040.00-7 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * bbswitch-0.8-37 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * bbswitch-0.8-37 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * vhba-module-20140928-18 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * vhba-module-20140928-18 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * r8168-8.040.00-7 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] namcap - games group & non-standard directory
by respiranto 23 Sep '15

23 Sep '15

Hi, I have just finished packaging freesweep, a minesweeper-game, after having had many problems to do so. Anyways, the current problem is, that namcap complains about: /var/games/freesweep/{,sweeptimes} being owned by root:games (E) and /var/games/{,freesweep/{,sweeptimes}} existing in a non-standard directory (W) The point is, that freesweep needs a file, that any user can write to. The way this would be done by `make install' is exactly how I did it in the PKGBUILD - make the file (sweeptimes) and its directory owned by root:games and give the games group write permissions. Some days ago, Justin Dray proposed to do exactly this to solve a more or less identical problem [1], however I would like to avoid pushing a PKGBUILD whose package does not pass namcap. So is there any better way to achieve what I want to? Furthermore I don't know, how strict the policy to only use standard directories, as listed here [2], is. And why does the /var/games directory exist if a package may not use it? May it only be populated by installed programs? [1] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2015-September/031535.html [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_packaging_standards#Directories

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Sep '15

23 Sep '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 12 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 33 packages missing signoffs * 12 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (12 total) == * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-23 (i686) * bbswitch-lts-0.8-12 (i686) * r8168-lts-8.040.00-3 (i686) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-43 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-4 (i686) * weston-1.9.0-1 (i686) * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-23 (x86_64) * bbswitch-lts-0.8-12 (x86_64) * r8168-lts-8.040.00-3 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-43 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-4 (x86_64) * weston-1.9.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (33 total) == * cimg-1.6.5-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-ioflo-1.3.9-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * salt-2015.8.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * sopel-6.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * wammu-0.39-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-23 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-37 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-lts-0.8-12 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.36.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.040.00-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-18 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * weston-1.9.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-23 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-37 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-lts-0.8-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gammu-1.36.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.040.00-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * weston-1.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (12 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * r8168-8.040.00-7 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * bbswitch-0.8-37 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * bbswitch-0.8-37 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * vhba-module-20140928-18 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * vhba-module-20140928-18 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * r8168-8.040.00-7 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Feedback request
by Dmitriy Morozov 22 Sep '15

22 Sep '15

I've made a Qt 5 port of qPutty (which is in turn a Qt 4 wrapper for putty, famous SSH/Telmet client). qPutty was in aur3 as orphan for some time and was dropped. One of the main goals was not only to port it to Qt 5, but also to be able to use recent putty versions which required lots of qPutty code to be modified. Actually I've already pushed this PKGBUILD to AUR since namcap is OK about it. The thing in question is fetching putty sources which are being used for building, but putty is not compiled as project itself. Please see PKGBUILD below and thanks in advance. # Maintainer: Dmitriy Morozov <dmorozov.mailbox(a)gmail.com> pkgname=qputty-qt5-git pkgver=501 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="A Qt 5 port for putty, the free telnet/ssh client" arch=('i686' 'x86_64') url="https://github.com/dsmorozov/qputty-qt5" license=('MIT LGPL3') depends=('glibc' 'gcc-libs' 'qt5-base' 'qt5-x11extras' 'libgssglue') makedepends=('git') conflicts=('qputty') source=('git://github.com/dsmorozov/qputty-qt5.git') md5sums=('SKIP') pkgver() { cd "$srcdir/${pkgname%-git}" printf "%s" "$(git describe --tags)" } prepare() { cd "$srcdir" # Fetch putty sources git clone git://git.tartarus.org/simon/putty.git cd putty git checkout tags/0.65 } build() { cd "$srcdir/${pkgname%-git}" qmake make } package() { cd $srcdir/${pkgname%-git} install -Dm0755 qPutty "$pkgdir/usr/bin/qPutty" install -Dm0644 qPutty.desktop "$pkgdir/usr/share/applications/qPutty.desktop" install -Dm0644 icons/qputty.svgz "$pkgdir/usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/qputty.svgz" install -Dm0644 LICENSE "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/qputty-qt5/LICENSE" }

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Sep '15

22 Sep '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 32 packages missing signoffs * 12 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (32 total) == * cimg-1.6.5-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-ioflo-1.3.9-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * salt-2015.8.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * sopel-6.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * wammu-0.39-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-22 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-37 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-lts-0.8-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.36.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.040.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-42 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-18 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-22 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-37 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-lts-0.8-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * docker-1:1.8.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gammu-1.36.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.040.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-42 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (12 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * r8168-8.040.00-7 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * bbswitch-0.8-37 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * bbswitch-0.8-37 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * vhba-module-20140928-18 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * vhba-module-20140928-18 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * r8168-8.040.00-7 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 2. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Sep '15

21 Sep '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 10 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 32 packages missing signoffs * 12 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (10 total) == * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-22 (i686) * bbswitch-lts-0.8-11 (i686) * r8168-lts-8.040.00-2 (i686) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-42 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-3 (i686) * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-22 (x86_64) * bbswitch-lts-0.8-11 (x86_64) * r8168-lts-8.040.00-2 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-42 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (32 total) == * cimg-1.6.5-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-ioflo-1.3.9-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * salt-2015.8.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * sopel-6.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * wammu-0.39-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-22 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-37 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-lts-0.8-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.36.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.040.00-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-42 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-18 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-lts-1.1.0-22 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-37 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-lts-0.8-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * docker-1:1.8.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gammu-1.36.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.040.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-42 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (12 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * r8168-8.040.00-7 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * bbswitch-0.8-37 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * bbswitch-0.8-37 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * vhba-module-20140928-18 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * vhba-module-20140928-18 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * r8168-8.040.00-7 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Sep '15

20 Sep '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 24 packages missing signoffs * 12 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (24 total) == * cimg-1.6.5-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-ioflo-1.3.9-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * salt-2015.8.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * sopel-6.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * wammu-0.39-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-37 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.36.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-18 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-37 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * docker-1:1.8.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gammu-1.36.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (12 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * r8168-8.040.00-7 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * bbswitch-0.8-37 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * bbswitch-0.8-37 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * vhba-module-20140928-18 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * vhba-module-20140928-18 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * r8168-8.040.00-7 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Rodent slow performance
by Ralf Mardorf 19 Sep '15

19 Sep '15

Hi, loading and scrolling through folders is very slow. Rodent becomes unusable, if folders have lots of items. I needed to replace rodent with spacefm and roxterm. On Ubuntu I still use rodent 5.0.5 and it works without issues. It already was slow, when I build it a few month ago. $ pacman -Q rodent librfm5 desktop-file-utils python2 rodent 5.3.16.0-1 librfm5 5.3.16.0-1 desktop-file-utils 0.22-1 python2 2.7.10-2 $ pacman -Qi rodent | grep Build Build Date : Thu 28 May 2015 02:10:13 PM CEST Am I the only one experiencing this issue? I wish to know this, before I report it upstream. I'm asking on the list too, because a comment on https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rodent will reach less users. Regards, Ralf

1 0

[aur-general] How to grant all users permission to write to a subdirectory of /opt?
by Storm Dragon 19 Sep '15

19 Sep '15

Howdy, I'm working on a package. The package will need to download sounds to a subdirectory of itself. I have placed the package in /opt. The package is /opt/tintin-alteraeon. It downloads the msp sounds from the Alter Aeon mud as it encounters them. But my current setup gives me, for example: sounds/spell//tensor.opus: Permission denied So, how can I give normal users permission to write to the sounds directory? Also, is that a bad thing to do? If so, I'll have to come up with a different way to handle sounds. -- Powered by Arch Linux! I am registered Linux user number 508465: https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.tk/ get my public PGP key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 43DDC193 Twitter and Facebook are so ... yesteryear. Get your 2MB Social account TODAY! http://2mb.social/main/register The great thing about Object Oriented code is that it can make small, simple problems look like large, complex ones. "As the moon is rising, give us the sign. Now let us rise up in awe, rock 'n' roll angels bring thy hard rock hallelujah, demons and angels all in one have arrived." Lordi - Hard Rock Hallelujah

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Sep '15

19 Sep '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 24 packages missing signoffs * 12 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * python-ioflo-1.3.9-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (24 total) == * cimg-1.6.5-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-ioflo-1.3.9-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * salt-2015.8.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * sopel-6.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * wammu-0.39-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-37 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.36.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-18 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-37 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * docker-1:1.8.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gammu-1.36.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (12 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * r8168-8.040.00-7 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * tp_smapi-0.41-74 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * acpi_call-1.1.0-35 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * bbswitch-0.8-37 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * bbswitch-0.8-37 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-13 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * vhba-module-20140928-18 (i686), since 2015-09-03 * vhba-module-20140928-18 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 * r8168-8.040.00-7 (x86_64), since 2015-09-03 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 4 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 4 signoffs

1 0