Hello aur-general! And first of all, i'm sorry
I'm sorry because maybe you actually talked about this and i didn't
looked at it because i'm lazy and deleted some e-mails without reading
them.
I have a package in AUR (with-git).
And i want to update it because it had an error and also it's a good
moment to update the version number.
I did the changes, git add, git commit, but when it's git push time:
invalid command: git
Try `ssh aur(a)aur.archlinux.org help` for a list of commands.
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
So i cloned again the repository using the ssh did all the changes
again, tried it again and I got the same error.
Then i did ssh aur(a)aur.archlinux.org list-repos:
minirc-git
python-q
with-git
So, it seems it's okay.
And when i use :
ssh aur(a)aur.archlinux.org git-upload-pack
It just take more than 20 minutes until i kill it because it can't take
that long.
Also,Â
git remote --verbose:
origin ssh://aur@aur.archlinux.org/with-git.git (fetch)
origin ssh://aur@aur.archlinux.org/with-git.git (push)
And,
cat .ssh/config:
Host aur.archlinux.org
 IdentityFile ~/.ssh/aur
 User aur
I just surrendered at that moment because, well, it was 5:45 am and i
thought "Damn, i'll ask in the mailing list". So, that's why i'm
writing here.
Maybe my question is silly, and i'm sorry but i just don't know what
i'm doing wrong.
(Sorry for my english too)
--
Juan MartÃnez <mratmartinez(a)anche.no>
Thank you everybody this is very clear. Sorry I did inadvertently enable
'daily digest' , this is what explains my late response.
On 1 Oct 2016 9:07 am, <aur-general-request(a)archlinux.org> wrote:
> Send aur-general mailing list submissions to
> aur-general(a)archlinux.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/aur-general
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> aur-general-request(a)archlinux.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> aur-general-owner(a)archlinux.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of aur-general digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Copy package from AUR archive (Yassine Imounachen)
> 2. Re: Copy package from AUR archive (Noel Kuntze)
> 3. Re: Copy package from AUR archive (Eli Schwartz)
> 4. Re: Copy package from AUR archive (Yassine Imounachen)
> 5. Re: Copy package from AUR archive (Martin K?hne)
> 6. Re: Copy package from AUR archive (Eli Schwartz)
> 7. Signoff report for [community-testing] (Arch Website Notification)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 18:43:39 +0100
> From: Yassine Imounachen <yassine256(a)gmail.com>
> To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org
> Subject: [aur-general] Copy package from AUR archive
> Message-ID:
> <CAGxAMcv0E1JxHwgdR1GPXSryD48inEPY5OqAn+mhE8aY8X8DoA@mail.
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hello,
> What are good practices of re-submitting deleted AUR3 packages? Namely
> 'strongswan-git'.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 19:49:54 +0200
> From: Noel Kuntze <noel(a)familie-kuntze.de>
> To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Copy package from AUR archive
> Message-ID: <86ec4d32-0a36-48b7-6890-04b6671c290f(a)familie-kuntze.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On 30.09.2016 19:43, Yassine Imounachen via aur-general wrote:
> > Hello,
> > What are good practices of re-submitting deleted AUR3 packages? Namely
> > 'strongswan-git'.
> >
>
> Hello Yassine,
>
> For strongSwan, a git package (even though there existed one once) does
> not make sense, because the git master branch is relatively unstable.
> If you actually want an up to date strongSwan package that is usable,
> you need to curate the commits.
>
> Just follow the best practices that are outlined on the wiki[1].
>
> [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_packaging_standards
>
> --
>
> Mit freundlichen Gr??en/Kind Regards,
> Noel Kuntze
>
> GPG Key ID: 0x63EC6658
> Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658
>
>
>
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 4 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 1 fully signed off package
* 14 packages missing signoffs
* 10 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) ==
* gnome-packagekit-3.22.0-1 (i686)
* gnome-software-3.22.0+23+g9812711-1 (i686)
* gnome-packagekit-3.22.0-1 (x86_64)
* gnome-software-3.22.0+23+g9812711-1 (x86_64)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) ==
* luarocks-2.4.0-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* gnome-packagekit-3.22.0-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* gnome-software-3.22.0+23+g9812711-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* luasec-2:0.6-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnome-packagekit-3.22.0-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gnome-software-3.22.0+23+g9812711-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Completed signoffs (1 total) ==
* luasec-2:0.6-1 (x86_64)
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (10 total) ==
* iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-10
* iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686), since 2016-07-10
* luasec-2:0.6-1 (i686), since 2016-07-14
* luasec-2:0.6-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-14
* powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (i686), since 2016-08-30
* powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (x86_64), since 2016-08-30
* prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (i686), since 2016-09-05
* prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (x86_64), since 2016-09-05
* bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (i686), since 2016-09-10
* bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (x86_64), since 2016-09-10
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. yan12125 - 4 signoffs