=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 13 packages missing signoffs
* 12 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) ==
* python-pbr-1.9.0-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* connman-1.31-6 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* gmic-1.7.0-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* nomacs-3.0.0-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* performous-1.1-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* vhba-module-20140928-26 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* connman-1.31-6 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* gmic-1.7.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* nomacs-3.0.0-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* performous-1.1-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* vhba-module-20140928-26 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (12 total) ==
* nomacs-3.0.0-2 (i686), since 2016-03-11
* nomacs-3.0.0-2 (x86_64), since 2016-03-11
* frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (i686), since 2016-03-11
* performous-1.1-2 (i686), since 2016-03-11
* frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (x86_64), since 2016-03-11
* performous-1.1-2 (x86_64), since 2016-03-11
* vhba-module-20140928-26 (i686), since 2016-03-15
* vhba-module-20140928-26 (x86_64), since 2016-03-15
* gmic-1.7.0-2 (i686), since 2016-03-29
* gmic-1.7.0-2 (x86_64), since 2016-03-29
* connman-1.31-6 (i686), since 2016-03-29
* connman-1.31-6 (x86_64), since 2016-03-29
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
I'd like to package another version of the AUR package android-sdk (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/android-sdk/), but without any content
in `/opt/android-sdk`, solely for managing package dependency and misc
files such as icon, desktop file and profile script. The real content of
the package should be managed by user itself under `/opt/android-sdk`,
outside of pacman. (This is a preference for some users like me.)
Since it does not come with most of the package content, should I call it
`android-sdk-fake`? But since it does come with the depenencies and misc
files, it is not a "really fake" package. Should I go with
`android-sdk-almost-fake` or something like that?
--
张海
浙江大学 计算机科学与技术
Blog: http://blog.zhanghai.me/
Github: https://github.com/DreaminginCodeZH
Hi,
There was an AUR package called popcorntime-ce-git, or
popcorntimece-git, that was removed Today.
I'm wondering if someone could retrieve it from an older version than
Today, and share the tarball with me.
I'm not a TU BTW...
Thanks,
--
Javier