June 2016 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] ttf-google-webfonts{,-distilled,-git,-hg} mess
by Jason St. John 19 Jun '19

19 Jun '19

I am the current maintainer of the AUR package ttf-google-webfonts-hg[4], and I'm bothered by the mess of various packages there are for Google's Web Fonts project. It's not at all KISS in its current state. There are currently four different AUR packages[1][2][3][4] that essentially supply the same files, and all four packages conflict with each other. Around August of 2012, the package named ttf-google-webfonts[1] was orphaned, and user w0ng created a GitHub repository[5] that mirrors the Mercurial repository[6] on Google Code (why?). Then, the new maintainer changed the original ttf-google-webfonts package from a VCS-type package that simply lacked "-hg" in the name to a package that pulls tarballs from w0ng's GitHub repo[5]. As you can see in the comments for ttf-google-webfonts[1], this has caused all sorts of confusion and messages about the package being out-of-date or having invalid checksums. To get around these issues, user epinephrine created the package ttf-google-webfonts-git[3] that clones w0ng's GitHub repo[5] instead of pulling tarballs from it, which significantly reduces the maintenance required on the package. Then, user Gently created a package named ttf-google-webfonts-distilled[2] that pulls a tarball from w0ng's GitHub repo[5] and only installs a small subset of the fonts therein. Shortly after ttf-google-webfonts[1] was changed from being a Mercurial-based package and not liking the direction that the package was taking, I reuploaded the original ttf-google-webfonts package as ttf-google-webfonts-hg[4] for people that simply wanted the old package back that uses the actual Google Web Fonts repository to download the files. To clean up this mess, I propose that ttf-google-webfonts-distilled[2] and ttf-google-webfonts-git[3] be deleted outright, for what should be obvious reasons. I also propose that ttf-google-webfonts[1] be deleted because of how frequently the Web Fonts project is updated and because the project lacks version numbers. If people really feel strongly about keeping that maintenance nightmare, then let them have it, but I really don't see what advantage it provides over the original ttf-google-webfonts-hg[4] other than one less makedepends. I apologize for the huge email, but this situation really is a mess. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-google-webfonts/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-google-webfonts-distilled/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-google-webfonts-git/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-google-webfonts-hg/ [5] https://github.com/w0ng/googlefontdirectory [6] https://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/ Jason

14 23

[aur-general] PKGBUILD Review Request: syncevolution
by Justus-dev＠Piater.name 02 Jul '16

02 Jul '16

I scratched an itch and would now like feedback on my first PKGBUILD. I enabled the features I need (which are all basic), plus all those that did not pull in too many additional dependencies and compiled without fuss. I split out syncevo-http-server because it depends on many Python packages, and many users won't need it. The patch (not included) replaces python by python2, fixes two minor compilation issues, and applies a hack to get it to work with libical2. (Upstream is aware.) (There are obsolete syncevolution packages in the AUR Archive, but I decided to start from scratch.) Thanks, Justus # Maintainer: Justus Piater <Justus-dev(a)Piater.name> pkgname=('syncevolution' 'syncevolution-http') pkgver=1.5.1 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="Synchronize PIM data via various protocols" arch=('i686' 'x86_64') url="https://syncevolution.org/" license=('LGPL') depends=('evolution-data-server' 'neon' 'openobex' 'python2' 'libunique') makedepends=('intltool' 'boost') #changelog= source=("https://download.01.org/syncevolution/syncevolution/sources/$pkgname-$pkgve…" "$pkgname-$pkgver.patch") sha256sums=('39f52049006c4a703bfe4b7cea3bb3298fe61b4ba9a8dbc367492409e4091c70' 'e8592cff59bc0ebc9bb2b35b63840d4207bb8bc321f244294122a40910b6aeb2') prepare() { cd "$pkgname-$pkgver" patch -p1 -i "$srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver.patch" } build() { cd "$pkgname-$pkgver" ./configure --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/lib/syncevolution --sysconfdir=/etc CXXFLAGS=-std=gnu++98 --enable-bluetooth --enable-core --enable-dbus-service --enable-notify --enable-notify-compatibility --enable-gui --enable-pbap --enable-dav make } package_syncevolution() { cd "$pkgbase-$pkgver" make DESTDIR="$pkgdir/" install rm -f $pkgdir/usr/bin/syncevo-http-server rmdir $pkgdir/usr/lib/syncevolution/test } package_syncevolution-http() { pkgdesc="Synchronize PIM data via various protocols (HTTP server)" arch=('any') depends=('syncevolution' 'python2-dbus' 'python2-twisted' 'python2-gobject2' 'python2-pyopenssl' 'python2-service-identity') #changelog= cd "$pkgbase-$pkgver" mkdir -p $pkgdir/usr/bin /usr/bin/install -c test/syncevo-http-server.py $pkgdir/usr/bin/syncevo-http-server }

4 5

[aur-general] gnuplot-colorbrewer
by Jorispilot 30 Jun '16

30 Jun '16

Hi, I'm trying to make my first package, and I have a few questions. This package instals gnuplot scripts from https://github.com/aschn/gnuplot-colorbrewer I followed wiki instructions and get inspiration from emacs-gnuplot-mode-git, but this package does not use md5sums. Is it possible to get an md5sum from a git repository? If so, how? Should I submit this package to the AUR? -- Jorispilot -- GPG: 0x7A0BD74B 4597 EFE7 5759 4AE8 7813 2D06 19DB 70D1 7A0B D74B

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 Jun '16

30 Jun '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * msgpack-c-2.0.0-1 (i686) * msgpack-c-2.0.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * avr-libc-2.0.0-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * msgpack-c-2.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * msgpack-c-2.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (i686), since 2016-05-09 * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (x86_64), since 2016-05-09 * avr-libc-2.0.0-2 (any), since 2016-05-10 * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (i686), since 2016-06-01 * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (x86_64), since 2016-06-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 8 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Jun '16

29 Jun '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * mbedtls-2.3.0-1 (i686) * mbedtls-2.3.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * avr-libc-2.0.0-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mbedtls-2.3.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mbedtls-2.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (i686), since 2016-05-09 * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (x86_64), since 2016-05-09 * avr-libc-2.0.0-2 (any), since 2016-05-10 * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (i686), since 2016-06-01 * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (x86_64), since 2016-06-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 7 signoffs 2. demize - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] PKGBUILDs for monkeysphere feedback
by Valo 28 Jun '16

28 Jun '16

Hello everybody, As gnupg 2.1.13 is now available in core I'd like to update monkeysphere to 0.38, here are the PKGBUILDs for monkeysphere[2] and for agent-transfer[1], a new monkeysphere checkdependency. Agent-transfer is included in the monkeysphere source code but it's a checkdependency and so I choose to create a separate package for it, is it correct? How can I make it better? Namcap will complain about monkeysphere dependencies as it thinks they are not needed but they actually are Thanks sValo [1] https://git.eigenlab.org/svalo/agent-transfer/blob/0.38/PKGBUILD [2] https://git.eigenlab.org/svalo/monkeysphere/blob/0.38/PKGBUILD

5 10

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Jun '16

28 Jun '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (i686) * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * avr-libc-2.0.0-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (i686), since 2016-05-09 * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (x86_64), since 2016-05-09 * avr-libc-2.0.0-2 (any), since 2016-05-10 * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (i686), since 2016-06-01 * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (x86_64), since 2016-06-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 3 signoffs 2. arojas - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Jun '16

27 Jun '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * bluegriffon-2.0-1 (i686) * bluegriffon-2.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * avr-libc-2.0.0-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qtav-1.11.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtav-1.11.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (i686), since 2016-05-09 * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (x86_64), since 2016-05-09 * avr-libc-2.0.0-2 (any), since 2016-05-10 * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (i686), since 2016-06-01 * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (x86_64), since 2016-06-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 3 signoffs 2. eworm - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Jun '16

26 Jun '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 13 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) == * android-udev-20160503-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-libc-2.0.0-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * tt-rss-1:r7981-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * android-tools-6.0.1_r46-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qtav-1.11.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * android-tools-6.0.1_r46-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtav-1.11.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (i686), since 2016-05-09 * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (x86_64), since 2016-05-09 * avr-libc-2.0.0-2 (any), since 2016-05-10 * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (i686), since 2016-06-01 * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (x86_64), since 2016-06-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Jun '16

25 Jun '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 3 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 13 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (3 total) == * android-udev-20160503-1 (any) * qupzilla-2.0.1-1 (i686) * qupzilla-2.0.1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) == * android-udev-20160503-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-libc-2.0.0-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * tt-rss-1:r7981-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * android-tools-6.0.1_r46-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qtav-1.11.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * android-tools-6.0.1_r46-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtav-1.11.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (i686), since 2016-05-09 * avr-gcc-6.1.1-1 (x86_64), since 2016-05-09 * avr-libc-2.0.0-2 (any), since 2016-05-10 * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (i686), since 2016-06-01 * avr-gdb-7.11.1-1 (x86_64), since 2016-06-01 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0