Aur-general July 2016

aur-general@lists.archlinux.org

32 participants
47 discussions

[aur-general] yaourt can't access ssl certs
by Jude DaShiell 12 Jul '16

12 Jul '16

I installed yaourt on an earlier system and never had this problem then. Has anyone else had this problem and if you've cleared the problem could you explain how? --

2 2

[aur-general] Review request for a new PKGBUILD
by Leonid Bloch 11 Jul '16

11 Jul '16

Hi AUR List! We would like to introduce a new package to the AUR. You are welcome to check out more about it on http://rbld.io Please notice, that this app is in the very early development stages, so any feedback is welcomed! ;) I am a long time Arch user, but this is my first PKGBUILD. I'd love to hear comments, if any, before I'll actually submit it to the AUR. Thanks a lot! Leonid. File below: ~~~~~~~~~ # Package maintainer: Leonid B <leonid at daynix dot com> # Upstream contact: rbld(a)rbld.io pkgname=rbld-git pkgver=r4.96410ab pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="Zero-dependency, reproducible build environments" arch=('any') url="http://rbld.io" license=('Apache') depends=('bash' 'docker') makedepends=('git') provides=('rbld') conflicts=('rbld') backup=('usr/etc/rebuild.conf') source=("${pkgname%-git}::git+https://github.com/daynix/rebuild") md5sums=('SKIP') pkgver() { cd "$srcdir/${pkgname%-git}" printf "r%s.%s" "$(git rev-list --count HEAD)" "$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)" } package() { cd "$srcdir/${pkgname%-git}/cli" make prefix="$pkgdir/usr/" install }

2 2

[aur-general] PKGBUILD: depends vs. makedepends and namcap warning
by Lukas Böger 11 Jul '16

11 Jul '16

Dear AUR list, simple question about dependencies in PKGBUILDs: Package A provides some header files and build scripts. Package B provides additional headers, and their usage only work out if A's headers are in place. Additionaly, package B can only be compiled using A's build scripts. 1) Is it correct to have package A in B's depends AND makedepends arrays? 2) Am I supposed to ignore namcap's warning 'Dependency included and not neede' because it doesn't take header dependencies into account? Thanks in advance for clarification, Lukas

4 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Jul '16

11 Jul '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686) * mpv-1:0.18.1-1 (i686) * iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64) * mpv-1:0.18.1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * bluegriffon-2.1.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mpv-1:0.18.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mpv-1:0.18.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Jul '16

10 Jul '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * bluegriffon-2.1.1-1 (i686) * bluegriffon-2.1.1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * bluegriffon-2.1.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mpv-1:0.18.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mpv-1:0.18.0-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 7 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Jul '16

09 Jul '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * discover-5.7.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mpv-1:0.18.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * discover-5.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mpv-1:0.18.0-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Jul '16

08 Jul '16

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 Jul '16

07 Jul '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * mpv-1:0.18.0-3 (i686) * mpv-1:0.18.0-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.26.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.26.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * discover-5.7.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mpv-1:0.18.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.26.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.26.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * discover-5.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mpv-1:0.18.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. arcanis - 15 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 Jul '16

06 Jul '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * discover-5.7.0-1 (i686) * discover-5.7.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.26.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.26.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * discover-5.7.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.26.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.26.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * discover-5.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Jul '16

05 Jul '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.26.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.26.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.26.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.26.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qupzilla-2.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 6 signoffs

1 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Aur-general July 2016