- Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 29 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 5 fully signed off packages * 40 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (29 total) == * libnl-3.2.22-1 (i686) * libnl-3.2.22-1 (x86_64) * texlive-bibtexextra-2013.30944-1 (any) * texlive-core-2013.30962-1 (any) * texlive-fontsextra-2013.30955-1 (any) * texlive-formatsextra-2013.30214-1 (any) * texlive-games-2013.30959-1 (any) * texlive-genericextra-2013.29803-1 (any) * texlive-htmlxml-2013.29725-1 (any) * texlive-humanities-2013.30815-1 (any) * texlive-langcjk-2013.30856-2 (any) * texlive-langcyrillic-2013.30653-1 (any) * texlive-langextra-2013.30816-1 (any) * texlive-langgreek-2013.30912-1 (any) * texlive-latexextra-2013.30964-1 (any) * texlive-music-2013.30005-1 (any) * texlive-pictures-2013.30637-1 (any) * texlive-plainextra-2013.30377-1 (any) * texlive-pstricks-2013.30956-1 (any) * texlive-publishers-2013.30958-1 (any) * texlive-science-2013.30910-1 (any) * bluez-5.7-1 (i686) * texlive-bin-2013.30973-1 (i686) * transmission-2.80-2 (i686) * vim-7.3.1287-1 (i686) * bluez-5.7-1 (x86_64) * texlive-bin-2013.30973-1 (x86_64) * transmission-2.80-2 (x86_64) * vim-7.3.1287-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (10 total) == * ed-1.9-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libgpg-error-1.12-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libnl-3.2.22-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * make-3.82-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xz-5.0.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ed-1.9-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * libgpg-error-1.12-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libnl-3.2.22-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * make-3.82-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xz-5.0.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (30 total) == * texlive-bibtexextra-2013.30944-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-core-2013.30962-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-fontsextra-2013.30955-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-formatsextra-2013.30214-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-games-2013.30959-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-genericextra-2013.29803-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-htmlxml-2013.29725-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-humanities-2013.30815-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-langcjk-2013.30856-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-langcyrillic-2013.30653-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-langextra-2013.30816-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-langgreek-2013.30912-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-latexextra-2013.30964-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-music-2013.30005-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-pictures-2013.30637-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-plainextra-2013.30377-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-pstricks-2013.30956-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-publishers-2013.30958-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-science-2013.30910-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bluez-5.7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qemu-1.5.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * subversion-1.8.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * texlive-bin-2013.30973-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * transmission-2.80-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vim-7.3.1287-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bluez-5.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qemu-1.5.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * texlive-bin-2013.30973-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * transmission-2.80-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vim-7.3.1287-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (5 total) == * dhcpcd-6.0.2-1 (i686) * syslinux-5.10-3 (i686) * dhcpcd-6.0.2-1 (x86_64) * syslinux-5.10-3 (x86_64) * subversion-1.8.0-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * syslinux-5.10-3 (i686), since 2013-06-06 * syslinux-5.10-3 (x86_64), since 2013-06-06 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 1 signoffs

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Starting work on TeXLive 2013
by Rémy Oudompheng 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

Hello, I have started work on TeXLive 2013 packaging. I will probably use staging temporarily if needed when releasing to [testing]. Upstream has merged the data files traditionnally packaged in texlive-bin with the ordinary data packages, so I plan to move the "config" files (/etc/texmf) to texlive-core. Texlive-bin will contain almost only executables and a few manpages. Rémy.

5 8

[arch-dev-public] Texlive 2013 packages releases to [testing]
by Rémy Oudompheng 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

Hello, I have pushed TeXLive 2013 packages to [testing]. The main difference with the 2012 packages is that /etc/texmf files are now in texlive-core rather than texlive-bin. The texlive-bin package now contains almost only binaries, and texlive-core contains all basic data files including the ones in /etc/texmf. Feel free to report any issues you encounter. If you have an existing installation, the upgrade might install new versions of /etc/texmf/ files as *.pacnew. It is unlikely that things work properly if you don't handle the pacnew files unless you realy know what you are doing. If pacnew files appear (notably texmf.cnf and fmtutil.cnf), and the installation reports a failure in regenerating formats (which you will know by not being able to use an engine), you will need to handle the pacnew files, and run "fmtutil-sys --all" by hand. If this situation reaches a high level of absurdity, and if possible considering pacman's behaviour, new packages not behaving like this might be built later before going to [extra]. Regards, Rémy.

1 0

[arch-dev-public] trouble building packages with .install files
by Jelle van der Waa 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

I'm having trouble building certain packages with .install files, for example aur/vim-youcompleteme-git. If I build it with extra-x86_64-build, I just get: ==> ERROR: install file (vimdoc.install) does not exist. I have the same issue on pkgbuild.com, for example the libreoffice PKGBUILD. I'm not sure what's causing this issue, but barthalion can also reproduce the problem. It seems startdir_host is empty. ─marlowe:pts/1 /var/lib/archbuild/extra-x86_64/barthalion └─% ls -lh startdir total 12K -rw------- 1 nobody root 902 Jul 1 11:53 PKGBUILD lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 Jul 1 11:53 YouCompleteMe -> /startdir_host/YouCompleteMe lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Jul 1 11:53 vimdoc.install -> /startdir_host/vimdoc.install ┌─marlowe:pts/1 /var/lib/archbuild/extra-x86_64/barthalion └─% ls -lh startdir_host total 0 -- Jelle van der Waa

2 1

[arch-dev-public] linux-3.10-1 in [staging]
by Tobias Powalowski 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

Hi, I built the kernel, now there are issues with following - extra binary modules: nvidia-304xx - community binary modules: cdfs ndiswrapper open-vm-tools-modules r8168 Please find patches and fix those. Please report other issues. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

3 3

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 6 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * transmission-2.80-1 (i686) * transmission-2.80-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (8 total) == * ed-1.9-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libgpg-error-1.12-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * make-3.82-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xz-5.0.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ed-1.9-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * libgpg-error-1.12-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * make-3.82-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xz-5.0.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (8 total) == * qemu-1.5.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * subversion-1.8.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * transmission-2.80-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xf86-video-intel-2.21.11-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qemu-1.5.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * transmission-2.80-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vim-7.3.1270-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xf86-video-intel-2.21.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (6 total) == * dhcpcd-6.0.2-1 (i686) * syslinux-5.10-3 (i686) * dhcpcd-6.0.2-1 (x86_64) * syslinux-5.10-3 (x86_64) * vim-7.3.1270-1 (i686) * subversion-1.8.0-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * syslinux-5.10-3 (i686), since 2013-06-06 * syslinux-5.10-3 (x86_64), since 2013-06-06 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] /etc/shells should keep /bin/zsh
by Sébastien Luttringer 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Chris Down <chris(a)chrisdown.name> wrote: > On 1 July 2013 18:32, Allan McRae <allan(a)archlinux.org> wrote: >> On 01/07/13 20:11, Karol Blazewicz wrote: >>> I know arch-general si not for reporting bugs and I'm not trying to >>> rush anyone, but it's been already a month of confusion wrt >>> > https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=package… >>> >>> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/35724 >> >> If a bug is open that long, it is likely to be closed as "Won't Fix". > > I think that one reason the bug has been open so long is because it > requires consensus to resolve rather than actual bug fixing. Specifically: > for binaries involved in situations where the symlink does not make the > transition transparent (in this case, because it's the path itself that > matters in input), should they (ideally) have: > > a. both the old path and /usr/bin be acceptable > b. only the old path be acceptable > c. only the new path be acceptable > > I'm pretty sure nobody would argue in favour of option b preferentially. I > am in favour of Arch continuing its long history of being first to > deprecate and going for c as long as it doesn't pose any major technical > problem. I agree and I think we should choose to have all our shell paths in the same directory in /etc/shells. Have 2 paths will be painful with chsh as I describe in the bugreport. I can create a TODO to updates required packages when the consensus is reached. I remember Dave, arguing in favor of keeping sheebang to /bin/bash to ensure portability. Cheers, -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Announcement for the 2013.07.01 ISO image
by Pierre Schmitz 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

Hi all, with the July install image a few notable features got added. There is initial support for secure boot and there are bootstrap tar files which can be used to install Arch from within another distribution. I have a hard time to write a news item about these though. I think it would be best if we had at least some short documentation about these in our wiki we can link to. There is probably no harm in delaying the announcement for a few days as these are just new features. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, https://pierre-schmitz.com

2 1

[arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

=== Signoff report for [testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 5 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) == * make-3.82-6 (i686) * xz-5.0.5-1 (i686) * make-3.82-6 (x86_64) * xz-5.0.5-1 (x86_64) * subversion-1.8.0-1 (i686) * xf86-video-intel-2.21.11-1 (i686) * subversion-1.8.0-1 (x86_64) * xf86-video-intel-2.21.11-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [core] (8 total) == * ed-1.9-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libgpg-error-1.12-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * make-3.82-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xz-5.0.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ed-1.9-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * libgpg-error-1.12-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * make-3.82-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xz-5.0.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [extra] (7 total) == * qemu-1.5.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * subversion-1.8.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xf86-video-intel-2.21.11-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qemu-1.5.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * subversion-1.8.0-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * vim-7.3.1270-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xf86-video-intel-2.21.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (5 total) == * dhcpcd-6.0.2-1 (i686) * syslinux-5.10-3 (i686) * dhcpcd-6.0.2-1 (x86_64) * syslinux-5.10-3 (x86_64) * vim-7.3.1270-1 (i686) == All packages in [testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * syslinux-5.10-3 (i686), since 2013-06-06 * syslinux-5.10-3 (x86_64), since 2013-06-06 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. angvp - 4 signoffs 2. jsteel - 2 signoffs

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Subversion 1.8.0 in [testing]
by Angel Velásquez 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

Hi guys, I've updated subversion to the last release and put into [testing], it used to be maintained by Stephane so it's my first time maintaining this package, since this is a major release I'd like to have some feedback before pushing to [extra] Thanks! -- Angel Velasquez Arch Linux Developer angvp @ irc.freenode.net http://www.angvp.com.ar

2 1