August 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Removal request: fenics group packages
by Myles English 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

Hi, I was pursuaded[1] to keep some unworthy packages in the AUR, and the thread was inconclusive (may be my final email was too long)... To summarise the contents of that thread: for a group of related packages, the stable versions are not likely to work for anyone and the VCS versions (*-bzr) are more sensible, but someone might adopt the stable ones, so we'll keep them lying around, at the risk of confusing users who install them by mistake to satisfy dependencies or the -bzr versions. What has changed since then is that now, users are indeed confused and no one has adopted the non-bzr pacakges so please would a hard working TU transfer any votes to the -bzr versions and delete as follows: Delete Migrate votes to | dolfin | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37270 | dolfin-bzr | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58971 | | ffc | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37268 | ffc-bzr | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59137 | | fiat | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37267 | fiat-bzr | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59138 | | instant | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20880 | instant-bzr| http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59369 | | ufc | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37269 | ufc-bzr | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59139 | | ufl | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37266 | ufl-bzr | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59140 | | viper | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37328 | viper-bzr | http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59007 | Thanks, Myles

2 2

[aur-general] Remove request: wally_bin
by Zhengyu Xu 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

Hi, Please help me to remove wally_bin (right now maintained by me) in the following link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=wally_bin because it is the same as wally: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20649 Thank you. Zhengyu

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. pierre - 8 signoffs 2. bisson - 7 signoffs 3. allan - 5 signoffs 4. dreisner - 2 signoffs 5. ibiru - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request
by Νίκος Θεοδώρου 11 Aug '12

11 Aug '12

Please merge [1] coolvlviewer-stable https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55986 into [2] coolvlviewer https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61915 Thanks! -- Νίκος Θεοδώρου «Ἀγεωμέτρητος μηδεὶς εἰσίτω!»

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Aug '12

11 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 24 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * homebank-4.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * homebank-4.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 9 signoffs 2. stephane - 5 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 4. eric - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Enthought packages
by François Boulogne 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

Hi, Several Enthought python tools on AUR are out-dated and have no maintainer. I was interresting in Miyavi. This package (python-enthought-mayavi) is out-dated and uncorrectly named since it depends on python2: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21647 The correct corresponding package is python2-mayavi https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46179 I think python-enthought-traits should be deleted https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21645 Out-dated, it doesn't compile, it was a dependance of python-enthought-mayavi and uncorrectly named (python2) Correct corresponding package : python2-traits The same for python-enthought-utils https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21646 python-enthought-enable https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32326 python-enthought-chaco https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32325 Thanks, -- François Boulogne. https://www.sciunto.org

2 2

[aur-general] Remove request: muttng
by jsteel 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

Hi, Please remove muttng https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10892. The link to the wiki states that the project is dead and recommends using mutt instead [1], their mailing lists have not had any activity since 2008 [2] and it no longer builds. Thanks, jsteel [1] http://www.strcat.de/muttng [2] http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/mutt-ng-users

2 1

[aur-general] Package delete: synergy-plus
by Jonathan Arnold 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

The synergy-plus effort has been combined with synergy, so the package can be deleted: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29622 -- Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Vinycius Maia 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

Please, remove libstreamanalyzer-kde-light [1] accidentally uploaded [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61888 Thanks!

2 1

[aur-general] Removal: i386-haiku-binutils-git
by Schala Zeal 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57424 I wanted to resubmit this without the -git suffix since GIT is the only means of obtaining this package, as there are no releases of any sort. The -git suffix, in this case, would only serve to imply that there's a release variant package I'd think.

3 2