- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] package deletion
by Daniele Formichelli 21 Oct '13

21 Oct '13

dkms-rpi-rtl8188eu-git can be deleted (see the comments)

2 1

Re: [aur-general] merge request smali2 into smali
by Maxime Gauduin 21 Oct '13

21 Oct '13

On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Levente Polyak <arch(a)leventepolyak.net> wrote: > Hello all, > > please merge smali2 [1] into smali [2] > > smali was marked out-of-date some time ago and not maintained, in the > meanwhile Fernando (Firef0x) submitted smali2 with a recent version. > As smali got disowned yesterday, i adopted it and updated it to 2.0 > after speaking to JesusFreke (the author of smali, who pointed out > that 1.4 is a dead end). > After also speaking to Fernando (smali2 submitter) we agreed that > smali2 got obsolete and he disowned slami2. > > kind regards, > Levente > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smali2/ > [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smali/ > Merged, thx. -- Maxime

1 0

[aur-general] Request to merge eclipse-382 and eclipse-38
by Fernando Gilberto da Silva 21 Oct '13

21 Oct '13

Hello, Eclipse 3.8.2 is released months ago, but the package eclipse-38 still remains in 3.8.0. No response from the maintainer. Hence I created the package eclipse-382 . Could someone merge eclipse-382 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-382 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-vimwiki-hg/> into eclipse-38 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-38 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-vimwiki-git/> ? What's more, I am ready to take responsibility for maintaining this package. Could someone do me a favour, disown the package for me? Thanks, Fernando Gilbertinho

3 4

[aur-general] Re-iterating the problem of AUR xorriso and Archlinux libisoburn
by Thomas Schmitt 21 Oct '13

21 Oct '13

Hi, six weeks ago, i asked for advise how to deal with the outdated AUR package of my program xorriso, which overwrites the executables of the properly maintained package https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=libisoburn On advise of this list, i later posted comments to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorriso/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorriso-tcltk/ which received no reply and did not cause any activity. A month ago i wrote to the published mail address of the maintainer "dreieck". No reaction since then. What can i do to instigate the resolution of this mess ? Meanwhile the AUR package "xorriso" overwrites the current "libisoburn" version xorriso-1.3.2 by a xorriso version, which is three releases and 8 months older. Between both releases there happened 13 bug fixes. Have a nice day :) Thomas

4 13

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Oct '13

21 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * mailman-2.1.16-1 (i686) * mailman-2.1.16-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * mailman-2.1.16-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * xmind-3.3.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xmind-3.3.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 28 signoffs 2. pierre - 8 signoffs 3. bisson - 2 signoffs 4. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] merge request smali2 into smali
by Levente Polyak 20 Oct '13

20 Oct '13

Hello all, please merge smali2 [1] into smali [2] smali was marked out-of-date some time ago and not maintained, in the meanwhile Fernando (Firef0x) submitted smali2 with a recent version. As smali got disowned yesterday, i adopted it and updated it to 2.0 after speaking to JesusFreke (the author of smali, who pointed out that 1.4 is a dead end). After also speaking to Fernando (smali2 submitter) we agreed that smali2 got obsolete and he disowned slami2. kind regards, Levente [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smali2/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smali/

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request: backintime-kde4
by member graysky 20 Oct '13

20 Oct '13

The split pkg 'backintime' provides the same binaries as 'backintime-kde4' rendering the later redundant. I checked with the current maintainer of 'backintime-kde4' and he/she agrees. This request is to delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/backintime-kde4 Please cc my on any reply as I am not subscribed. Thanks,

2 1

[aur-general] Merge Request: pyobfsproxy -> obfsproxy
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 20 Oct '13

20 Oct '13

Package [pyobfsproxy][1] should be merged to [obfsproxy][2], because the upstream project name does not changed, only a python version replaces the old C version, and package [obfsproxy][2] has been updated with the python version. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyobfsproxy/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obfsproxy/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Oct '13

20 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * xmind-3.3.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xmind-3.3.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 3 signoffs 2. pierre - 2 signoffs 3. bpiotrowski - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] kfaenza-icon-theme disown
by Daniele Formichelli 19 Oct '13

19 Oct '13

Hi, I would like to disown package kfaenza-icon-them from maintainer JokerBoy. He has not responded to comments on the AUR page ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfaenza-icon-theme/) and it doesn't build Thank you, Daniele Formichelli

3 3

[aur-general] Merge request: libgpod-git-iphone -> libgpod-git
by Ivan Shapovalov 19 Oct '13

19 Oct '13

Hi, Please, merge libgpod-git-iphone[1] package into libgpod-git[2] since it is carrying a patch currently applied in the upstream. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgpod-git-iphone/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgpod-git/ Thanks, -- Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Hyacinthe Cartiaux 19 Oct '13

19 Oct '13

Please, merge prettyping-mercurial[1] into prettyping-hg[2]. I've renamed it according to the naming guideline for mercurial packages. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/prettyping-mercurial/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/prettyping-hg/ Thanks -- Hyacinthe

2 1

[aur-general] Brackets disown
by Daniele Formichelli 19 Oct '13

19 Oct '13

Hi, the package brackets is flagged as out of date and doesn't work since September, 6th. The maintainer doesn't reply neither to email nor comments on aur. I would like to adopt it, is it possible to make it orphan?

3 4

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: links-g-directfb
by Maxime Gauduin 19 Oct '13

19 Oct '13

On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:20 PM, <lukas.graetz(a)web.de> wrote: > Dear Maxime, > > > There was no need to create a duplicate thread for this. > I'm sorry for seending sending you duplicates. I was irritadet because I > got no answer like > > You sent your > > mail to JokerBoy on the 5th, there is still one day left before we can > > disown the package. > before. I thought you hadn't noticed my mail. > Anyway, I still got no answer from Jokerboy. Could you disown it jet, > please? > lks > Package disowned, you're free to grab it. -- Maxime

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Oct '13

19 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * xmind-3.3.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xmind-3.3.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 10 signoffs 2. tpowa - 10 signoffs 3. thomas - 2 signoffs 4. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] deletion request
by G. Schlisio 19 Oct '13

19 Oct '13

please delete the currently orphan vim-r-plugin2 [0] which is an outdated duplicate of vim-r [1]. thanks [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-r-plugin2/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-r/

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request
by Dustin Falgout 18 Oct '13

18 Oct '13

Hi, I noticed that thunderbird-extension-gnome-keyring-git^[1] <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunderbird-extension-gnome-keyring-git/> is a duplicate of thunderbird-gnome-keyring-git^[2] <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunderbird-gnome-keyring/> . It has already been disowned so could someone remove it? Thanks!! Dustin ------- [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunderbird-extension-gnome-keyring-git/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunderbird-gnome-keyring/

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request ffmpeg-full-git-fixed
by Justin Dray 18 Oct '13

18 Oct '13

Trying to navigate the pile of different versions of ffmpeg on AUR is quite a hassle currently. Please either delete ffmpeg-full-git-fixed or merge it in to ffmpeg-full-git. It appears to have only been made due to the original maintainer of ffmpeg-full-git not responding quickly, and the maintainer of ffmpeg-full-git-fixed has stated in the comments that he no longer maintains it. It has also been marked as out of date for 2+ months. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ffmpeg-full-git-fixed/ Regards, Justin Dray E: justin(a)dray.be M: 0433348284

2 1

[aur-general] remove: tqsl
by Wijnand Modderman-Lenstra 18 Oct '13

18 Oct '13

Hi, Can you please remove the tsql package from AUR? I adopted the orphaned trustedqsl package, tqsl is a duplicate of that. ~Wijnand

2 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Oct '13

18 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * cgminer-3.6.3-1 (i686) * cgminer-3.6.3-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * cgminer-3.6.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cgminer-3.6.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * xmind-3.3.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xmind-3.3.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion Request - rEFIt
by Keshav Padram Amburay 18 Oct '13

18 Oct '13

Hi, rEFIt is no longer maintained upstream and its author recommends everyone to switch to rEFInd instead, at http://refit.sourceforge.net/ . So please delete AUR refit https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/refit/ package. With Best Regards, Keshav

4 3

[aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
by Florian Dejonckheere 18 Oct '13

18 Oct '13

Please merge rmlint [1] into rmlint-git [2]. GitHub dropped named downloads a while ago, and thus the package is outdated. Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint-git/

3 6

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: links-g-directfb
by Maxime Gauduin 18 Oct '13

18 Oct '13

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:35 AM, lukas.graetz(a)web.de wrote: > > My last try to write this mail ;) > > Hi, > I would like to take links-g-directfb over. The owner jokerboy did > not answer within to weeks. > link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/links-g-directfb/ > Would you be so nice to disown that package. > > Note that other poeple are interrested to maintain the other packages > by jokerboy listed obove, especialy "kfaenza-icon-theme" with link > "https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfaenza-icon-theme". > > Thanx lks > There was no need to create a duplicate thread for this. You sent your mail to JokerBoy on the 5th, there is still one day left before we can disown the package. -- Maxime

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: ttf-cantarell
by Jason St. John 18 Oct '13

18 Oct '13

Hello, I'm requesting that ttf-cantarell be deleted. It appears to be an old duplicate of cantarell-fonts, which is in [extra]. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-cantarell/ https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/cantarell-fonts/ Thanks

3 3

[aur-general] Disown request: links-g-directfb
by lukas.graetz＠web.de 18 Oct '13

18 Oct '13

My last try to write this mail ;) Hi, I would like to take links-g-directfb over. The owner jokerboy did not answer within to weeks. link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/links-g-directfb/ Would you be so nice to disown that package. Note that other poeple are interrested to maintain the other packages by jokerboy listed obove, especialy "kfaenza-icon-theme" with link "https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfaenza-icon-theme". Thanx lks

1 0