- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Merge request
by G. Schlisio 12 Jun '13

12 Jun '13

can a TU please merge aquaria-hib-hg [0] into aquaria-hib-git [1] both maintainers agreed to this. see also comments at [0] and [1] thanks [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aquaria-hib-hg/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aquaria-hib-git/

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Jun '13

12 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686), since 2013-05-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64), since 2013-05-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 3 signoffs 2. heftig - 3 signoffs 3. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [DELETE] ttwm
by Jesse McClure 11 Jun '13

11 Jun '13

TUs, Accidentally removing the tarball from github is a good indicator its time to officially remove ttwm. Any ttwm users who've missed the memo, should switch to alopex-git. Please remove ttwm from the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttwm/ Thanks, Jesse AKA 'Trilby'

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Jun '13

11 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: mesa-r300g-xorg
by Martin Stolpe 11 Jun '13

11 Jun '13

Hello, can someone please delete the mesa-r300g-xorg package. The xorg state tracker is no longer devloped (VMware switched to XA state tracker and AMD is using GLAMOR now). Regards

2 3

[aur-general] Orphan request: gnupg-pkcs11-scd
by Gregor Robinson 10 Jun '13

10 Jun '13

Package gnupg-pkcs11-scd has been out of date for almost two years, has been flagged as such since 2011-12-21, and its maintainer has not responded to my emails for two weeks. I am willing to maintain, and have a new PKGBUILD ready to go. Will someone please orphan it? Thanks! Gregor

2 1

[aur-general] SPICE cleanup
by Jakub Klinkovský 10 Jun '13

10 Jun '13

Hi, please delete these packages: * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/celt051/ (orphaned, there's https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/celt0.5.1/) * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spice-gtk-fedora/ (orphaned, outdated version, source unavailable) * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spice-client/ (orphaned, outdated - 'spice' provides up-to-date version) Thanks

2 3

[aur-general] Request for removal
by Jesse Jaara 10 Jun '13

10 Jun '13

[1]memcpymemset is bad duplicate of [2]libcofi_rpi-git [2]libcofi_rpi-git has been superseded by [3]arm-mem-git Remove: [1] & [2] --------------------------------------------------------- [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/memcpymemset/ [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcofi_rpi-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Jun '13

10 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 5 signoffs 2. thomas - 1 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs 4. heftig - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Forgot my username
by Sherif Nagy 10 Jun '13

10 Jun '13

Dears, I forgot my login username in aur, i managed to rest the password but there is no link to resend username , any idea how can i retrieve it ? Thx Sherif

4 4

[aur-general] merge request: lenmus-svn into lenmus
by Uwe Koloska 10 Jun '13

10 Jun '13

Please merge lenmus-svn[1] into lenmus[2]. There is now a stable build of the current version. Both are maintained by me. Thank you Uwe Links: [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lenmus-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lenmus/

2 3

[aur-general] Delete request: i7z-svn
by member graysky 09 Jun '13

09 Jun '13

Please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/i7z-svn/ Upstream is hosted on github and available via: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/i7z-git/

2 1

[aur-general] systemd-rtirq/rtirq
by Rob Til Freedmen 09 Jun '13

09 Jun '13

These packages are providing the same functionality and are based on the same source https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtirq/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/systemd-rtirq/ I think they should be merged - not sure which name should survive But I tend to rtirq - the prefix systemd is just a implementation detail I've cc'ed both maintainers - so they should come to an agreement.

2 3

[aur-general] Deletion request: ultrastardx
by Robert Knauer 09 Jun '13

09 Jun '13

Hello, please delete my package ultrastardx[1]. It doesn't work for over a year now, there is no new version upstream and I don't think there will ever be one, because v1.1 was released in 2010 and there's not much activity in SVN. I maintain a working development package, ultrastardx-svn[2], which should be used instead. Regards, Robert. Links: [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ultrastardx/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ultrastardx-svn/ -- GnuPG-Key: EDC67BBA Fingerprint: D5F0 BC03 3F6D 521C 6F2D 40C8 DDBA 25D9 EDC6 7BBA

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Jun '13

09 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 2. jsteel - 1 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: numix-icons-theme-git
by Diego Principe 09 Jun '13

09 Jun '13

Please remove numix-icons-theme-git because i've duplicate in numix-icon-theme-git (whitout 's'). I want to keep numix-icon-theme-git and remove numix-icons-theme-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/numix-icons-theme-git/ *Diego*

2 1

[aur-general] remove savex
by Alexej Magura 09 Jun '13

09 Jun '13

Could yall please remove savex, I was so excited about it finally working and everything that I got carried away and added it to the AUR way ahead of schedule. I both maintain the AUR package thingy for savex and develop savex. here's a link https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/savex/ -- Alexej Magura Give a little more for a little less today. :)

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Nuno Araujo 08 Jun '13

08 Jun '13

Hi Could you please merge arnold-pulseaudio [1] into arnold [2] ? The maintainer of arnold has now enabled pulseaudio support into it's PKGBUILD so mine (arnold-pulseaudio) is now unnecessary. Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arnold-pulseaudio/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arnold/ -- Nuno Araujo <nuno.araujo(a)russo79.com>

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Jun '13

08 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * denemo-1.0.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * freetalk-3.2-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * geda-gaf-1.8.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lilypond-2.16.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailutils-2.2-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xbindkeys-1.8.5-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * denemo-1.0.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * freetalk-3.2-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * geda-gaf-1.8.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lilypond-2.16.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailutils-2.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xbindkeys-1.8.5-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 2. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 Jun '13

07 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 31 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (31 total) == * laptop-mode-tools-1.63-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * blueman-1.23-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * connman-1.15-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cwiid-0.6.00-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * denemo-1.0.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dolphin-emu-1:3.5-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * freetalk-3.2-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.32.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * geda-gaf-1.8.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnokii-0.6.31-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lilypond-2.16.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailutils-2.2-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-pybluez-0.18-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xbindkeys-1.8.5-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xbmc-12.2-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * blueman-1.23-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * connman-1.15-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cwiid-0.6.00-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * denemo-1.0.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dolphin-emu-1:3.5-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * freetalk-3.2-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gammu-1.32.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * geda-gaf-1.8.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnokii-0.6.31-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lilypond-2.16.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailutils-2.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-pybluez-0.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xbindkeys-1.8.5-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-12.2-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 13 signoffs 2. thomas - 4 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 4. heftig - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] ocamlnet
by oliver 07 Jun '13

07 Jun '13

Hello, I just marked it as outdated... ...then i saw that it is orphaned and adopted it. It has 28 votes... pacman -Ss ocamlnet does not tell me that it is officcially now. Or is this planned already? If not, I will update the package during the next days... ...otherwise again orphaning it might make sense... Anyone here, who knows details about it? Ciao, Oliver

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Evan Teitelman 07 Jun '13

07 Jun '13

Could you please remove sqlmap-svn? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sqlmap-svn/ The project uses Git as its VCS now.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Evan Teitelman 07 Jun '13

07 Jun '13

Could you please remove arachni-rpc-em? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arachni-rpc-em/

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by foalsrock 06 Jun '13

06 Jun '13

Hi, I'd like to request deletion of the following packages which have been submitted and maintained by me. All of the sources have been outdated for quite some time now and will more than likely never get picked up again. drakfire-dream-suite: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/drakfire-dream-suite/ elegant-brit-gtk3-theme: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elegant-brit-gtk3-theme/ gnome-shell-extension-battery-remaining-time-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-extension-battery-remaining-… gnome-shell-extension-extended-volume-indicator-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-extension-extended-volume-in… gnome-shell-theme-gaia: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-gaia/ gnome-shell-theme-slave: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-slave/ gnome-shell-theme-sugar: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-sugar/ gnome-shell-theme-x3me: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-theme-x3me/ Thanks

2 2

[aur-general] all my Perl modules
by John D Jones III 06 Jun '13

06 Jun '13

I have a number of Perl Module PKGBUILDs on the AUR, that have been in some manner of teetering or outright busted for a few weeks now. I just wanted to give everyone the heads i will be incrementing and submitting all of my Perl Modules over night to address the Out-of-Date-ness, pacman 4.1 borkedness, and those pesky 5.18 modules too... I anticipate a failure rate of 1.5% ( ~12 ) and will manually correct these, or submit for removal as applicable. ( Gtk2::MozEmbed is one that will most likely be up for removal )... Anyways, I just wanted to pass this along, I've been getting tons of ever increasingly threatening emails about my PKGBUILDs... expect this to change. FYI, my AUR user is jnbek, and this is my 'mailing list' address, not my regular address; my regular address is found on my AUR Profile; that said, I only reply to mails from this address with regard to, well; mailing lists, and I'll only respond on my regular email for direct contact with me. (Ask, I do respond!! :D) -- John D Jones III Perl/Javascript/Systemd Zealot unixgeek1972(a)gmail.com http://www.zoelife4u.org/

1 0