- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Merge request komodo-ide
by JokerBoy 02 Jun '13

02 Jun '13

Hello, Please merge komodoide <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/komodoide/> into komodo-ide <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/komodo-ide/>. Thanks.

1 0

[aur-general] SysV init file in package
by xartii 02 Jun '13

02 Jun '13

Hi, I'm the maintainer of the psad [1] package in AUR. The package comes with to init files, one for systemd and other one for SysV. As some time has passed since the switch to systemd my question is, is it ok to remove sysV init file from the package. Or should I keep it for compatibility reasons. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/psad/ -- xartii

3 2

[aur-general] Removal request: "spotcommander-xampp"
by Ole Jon Bjørkum 02 Jun '13

02 Jun '13

I request that the package "spotcommander-xampp" be removed from AUR. URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spotcommander-xampp/ Reason: I am the developer of SpotCommander. The version in AUR is very outdated. I am planning to upload the latest version of SpotCommander to AUR, and to avoid confusion among users, I think the old package should be removed. The new version is better in every way, so there's no reason to keep it around. I have talked to the maintainer of the package and he agree. SpotCommander can also be installed manually: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/SpotCommander. The package I am going to upload to AUR automates this process.

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Jun '13

02 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 29 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * exim-4.80.1-5 (i686) * exim-4.80.1-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (28 total) == * clonezilla-3.3.10-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ddclient-3.8.1-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * drbl-2.3.10-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * firewalld-0.3.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * autofs-5.0.7-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ecryptfs-utils-103-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * esmtp-1.2-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * exim-4.80.1-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mksh-R46-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * opensmtpd-5.3.2p1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shfs-utils-0.35-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tcsh-6.18.01-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * autofs-5.0.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ecryptfs-utils-103-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esmtp-1.2-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * exim-4.80.1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mksh-R46-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * opensmtpd-5.3.2p1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shfs-utils-0.35-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tcsh-6.18.01-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * tt-rss-1.7.9-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 30 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 12 signoffs 3. tomegun - 10 signoffs 4. djgera - 8 signoffs 5. allan - 5 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] deletion request
by Moritz Rudert (helios) 01 Jun '13

01 Jun '13

Hi, please delete ffingerd [1] because the author says [2] that it needs to be rewritten. greetings helios [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ffingerd/ [2] http://www.fefe.de/ffingerd/

2 1

[aur-general] deletion request: luasocket2-hg
by Moritz Rudert (helios) 01 Jun '13

01 Jun '13

Hi, please delete luasocket2-hg [1] because it has been replaced by luasocket-git [2]. greetings helios [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/luasocket2-hg/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/luasocket-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Renaming: lastpass -> lastpass-pocket / lastpass-universal -> lastpass
by Det 01 Jun '13

01 Jun '13

On Monday, May 27, 19:43:37 Det wrote: > On Thursday, May 23, 2013 22:08:55 Felix Yan wrote: > > To rename a package, please first submit a new package under the desired new name, then send a merge request to the list. > > > > In your case, please first submit package 'lastpass-pocket', then I or someone else could do the two merges for you, thanks! > Mm, right. Here's the setup again: > > - merge lastpass[1] "info" with lastpass-pocket[2] > - move lastpass-universal[3] to lastpass[1] > > [1] = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lastpass/ > [2] = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lastpass-pocket/ > [3] = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lastpass-universal/ Why are you so mean? Det

2 1

[aur-general] aur removal request: pdfeditor
by Jozef Riha 01 Jun '13

01 Jun '13

please remove my pkgbuild for https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pdfeditor/ - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/masterpdfeditor/ provides the same software and is better maintained. thanks, jose

2 1

[aur-general] /bin/false exited with status 1
by Leonidas Spyropoulos 01 Jun '13

01 Jun '13

Hello, I am getting this error when I try to use the systemd as user. I used to have mpd set up as user with systemd before some updates, but recently I didn't test it. How could I debug that to find the issue? $ systemctl --user status mpd.service Failed to issue method call: Process /bin/false exited with status 1 Thanks, Leonidas -- Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health. #include <stdio.h> int main(){printf("%s","\x4c\x65\x6f\x6e\x69\x64\x61\x73");}

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Jun '13

01 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 25 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 33 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (25 total) == * clonezilla-3.3.10-2 (any) * ddclient-3.8.1-7 (any) * drbl-2.3.10-2 (any) * autofs-5.0.7-3 (i686) * ecryptfs-utils-103-2 (i686) * esmtp-1.2-5 (i686) * exim-4.80.1-4 (i686) * mksh-R46-3 (i686) * ndiswrapper-1.58-11 (i686) * opensmtpd-5.3.2p1-2 (i686) * oss-4.2_2007-4 (i686) * shfs-utils-0.35-5 (i686) * tcsh-6.18.01-2 (i686) * wvstreams-4.6.1-6 (i686) * autofs-5.0.7-3 (x86_64) * ecryptfs-utils-103-2 (x86_64) * esmtp-1.2-5 (x86_64) * exim-4.80.1-4 (x86_64) * mksh-R46-3 (x86_64) * ndiswrapper-1.58-11 (x86_64) * opensmtpd-5.3.2p1-2 (x86_64) * oss-4.2_2007-4 (x86_64) * shfs-utils-0.35-5 (x86_64) * tcsh-6.18.01-2 (x86_64) * wvstreams-4.6.1-6 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (32 total) == * clonezilla-3.3.10-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ddclient-3.8.1-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * drbl-2.3.10-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * firewalld-0.3.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * autofs-5.0.7-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ecryptfs-utils-103-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * esmtp-1.2-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * exim-4.80.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * jack2-1.9.9.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mksh-R46-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * opensmtpd-5.3.2p1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shfs-utils-0.35-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tcsh-6.18.01-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ussp-push-0.11-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * autofs-5.0.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ecryptfs-utils-103-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * esmtp-1.2-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * exim-4.80.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.9.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mksh-R46-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * opensmtpd-5.3.2p1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shfs-utils-0.35-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tcsh-6.18.01-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ussp-push-0.11-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * tt-rss-1.7.9-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 16 signoffs 2. tomegun - 14 signoffs 3. jsteel - 10 signoffs 4. djgera - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Remove sensors_lxpanel_plugin
by Rikard Falkeborn 31 May '13

31 May '13

Hello, There is currently sensors_lx_panel_plugin and sensors-lx-panel-plugin in the AUR, both pointing at the same package. Please remove (the outdated) sensors_lx_panel_plugin. Rikard

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 31 May '13

31 May '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * firewalld-0.3.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.9.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libvirt-1.0.5-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ussp-push-0.11-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * jack2-1.9.9.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-1.0.5-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ussp-push-0.11-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * tt-rss-1.7.9-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686), since 2013-03-14 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64), since 2013-03-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 6 signoffs 2. allan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 May '13

30 May '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * libvirt-1.0.5-7 (i686) * ussp-push-0.11-6 (i686) * libvirt-1.0.5-7 (x86_64) * ussp-push-0.11-6 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * firewalld-0.3.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.9.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libvirt-1.0.5-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ussp-push-0.11-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * jack2-1.9.9.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-1.0.5-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ussp-push-0.11-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * tt-rss-1.7.9-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686), since 2013-03-14 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64), since 2013-03-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 6 signoffs 2. tpowa - 5 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 4 signoffs 4. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request: umurmur
by Robert Knauer 29 May '13

29 May '13

Hello, could you please disown umurmur[1]? It's outdated for more than a year now, the PKGBUILD is against the guidelines (no package(), || return 1, no quotes, ...) and I have a working PKGBUILD for the newest version and with systemd support. Regards, Robert. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/umurmur/ -- GnuPG-Key: EDC67BBA Fingerprint: D5F0 BC03 3F6D 521C 6F2D 40C8 DDBA 25D9 EDC6 7BBA

2 1

[aur-general] duplicate package/merge request python(2)-flask-mail
by Zack Buhman 29 May '13

29 May '13

python-flask-mail [1] is both out of date and named improperly. python2-flask-mail [2] already exists, unfortunately, and is of negligibly higher quality (and up to date), so I suggest python-flask-mail [1] be merged into python2-flask-mail [2] (or however duplicate packages are normally handled) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-flask-mail/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-flask-mail/

2 1

[aur-general] AUR cleanup
by Alexander 29 May '13

29 May '13

Please remove the following packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antlr3.5/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antlr3.5/>https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antlr3/ Both of them provide the same thing and can be replaced by the package in [extra]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/java-antlr3/ -- With regards, Polovtcev Alexander

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 May '13

29 May '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * libvirt-1.0.5-6 (i686) * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) * libvirt-1.0.5-6 (x86_64) * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) * tt-rss-1.7.9-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * firewalld-0.3.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.9.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libvirt-1.0.5-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * jack2-1.9.9.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-1.0.5-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * tt-rss-1.7.9-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686), since 2013-03-14 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64), since 2013-03-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: python-flask-themes and python-flask-uploads
by Moritz Lipp 29 May '13

29 May '13

Hello, I would like to request the removal of the following two packages: * python-flask-themes https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-flask-themes/ * python-flask-uploads https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-flask-uploads/ Since python-flask has been renamed to python2-flask the above packages have been renamed as well to python2-flask-themes and python2-flask-uploads and are therefore obsolete. Kind regards, Moritz

2 1

[aur-general] Request to remove xtables-addons-multikernel
by Ľubomír Krajčovič 29 May '13

29 May '13

Hello, please remove the xtables-addons-multikernel package [1] from the AUR since I have reworked it to use dkms and hence renamed to xtables-addons-dkms [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xtables-addons-multikernel/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xtables-addons-dkms/

2 1

[aur-general] orphan request: python-flask-oauth
by Zack Buhman 29 May '13

29 May '13

I attempted to message the current maintainer about getting python-flask-oauth [1] to python2-flask-oauth, but the message bounced with "550 5.1.1 <socialcompu(a)abv.bg>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table". If this package could be orphaned, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-flask-oauth/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 May '13

28 May '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 5 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (5 total) == * firewalld-0.3.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.9.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * jack2-1.9.9.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686), since 2013-03-14 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64), since 2013-03-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. ibiru - 2 signoffs 2. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal Request: firestarter-gtkstatusicon
by Phillip Smith 28 May '13

28 May '13

I'd like to suggest [1] be removed as it is identical to the plain firestarter package [2], except with one patch commented out. Seems wasteful to have a separate package just to comment 1 patch. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firestarter-gtkstatusicon/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firestarter/

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request: libgee-0.6
by Masato Hashimoto 28 May '13

28 May '13

Hi, Please remove libgee-0.6[1]. It's idential to libgee06 on Extra. I forgot to confirm the legacy version of libgee is existent before submitting. Thx [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgee-0.6/ -- HASHIMOTO, Masato

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request [5/27]
by Limao Luo 28 May '13

28 May '13

The following packages https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/acroread/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dosbox-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/violet/ are all broken atm, and have been for a while. The maintainer's email bounces, and acroread even has a solution in the comments. I would like to fix them up, if that's possible. Thanks in advance. - luolimao

3 2

[aur-general] community/python2-flask conflicts python-flask
by Zack Buhman 28 May '13

28 May '13

I was in the process of creating a python3 package [1] for flask, but I've noticed python2-flask [2] seems to conflicts+replace "python-flask". I imagine this was for historical reasons, but this introduces probably unintentional behavior when a package provides python-flask (the python3 version of flask): :: python-flask-git and python2-flask are in conflict (python-flask). Remove python2-flask? [y/N] Would it be appropriate to (directly) contact said TU about his package, or is it innappropriate to expect TUs to yield to AUR packages/maintainers? Thanks. [1] http://ix.io/5OI [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/python2-flask/

2 3