- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Merge Request: wps-office to kingsoft-office
by GSC 17 May '13

17 May '13

wps-office changed its name to kingsoft-office Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wps-office/ to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kingsoft-office/

2 1

[aur-general] delete request: profile-sync-daemon-rc
by member graysky 16 May '13

16 May '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/profile-sync-daemon-rc/ The maintainer has orphaned the PKGBUILD and the upstream link to the source files is 404 not found.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: libsmfm-git
by Vadim Ushakov 16 May '13

16 May '13

Hi, can you please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libsmfm-git/ It was split into two packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libsmfm-core-git/ and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libsmfm-gtk2-git/ -- Regards, Vadim Ushakov

2 1

[aur-general] remove request for tschack/tschack-git
by Rob Til Freedmen 16 May '13

16 May '13

Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tschack/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tschack-git/ They are unmaintained & upstream url is dead.

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 May '13

16 May '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * penlight-1.1.1-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * penlight-1.1.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * collectd-5.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nsd-3.2.15-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * unbound-1.4.20-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * collectd-5.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nsd-3.2.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * unbound-1.4.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686), since 2013-03-14 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64), since 2013-03-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 3 signoffs 2. eric - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown Request: cryptkeeper
by Phillip Smith 16 May '13

16 May '13

Could someone please disown [1] => Does not build in a chroot due to the usage of $startdir which is depreciated => gtk2 is still missing as a dependency => Current maintainer is ignoring comments => 2/3 of current maintainers packagers are out of date [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cryptkeeper/

2 1

[aur-general] How to use a local directory as the source for a -git package
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 15 May '13

15 May '13

I have tried the following, none of them working source="git://../.." source="git+../../" source="git+/path/to/somefile"

4 6

[aur-general] Delete Request
by Tom Wambold 15 May '13

15 May '13

Can you please delete the pcapy package [1]? I've uploaded a newer version with the correct naming style (python2-pcapy). Thanks! -Tom Wambold [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pcapy/

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Evan Teitelman 15 May '13

15 May '13

Could you please delete 'archtrack-all' (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archtrack-all/)?

2 1

[aur-general] Disown (or update) coffee-script package
by Anatol Pomozov 15 May '13

15 May '13

Hi, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/coffee-script package is broken since 4.1 release. There is an update provided in comments more than 2 weeks ago, but current maintainer did not respond. Please either update the package or disown it, so I can update/improve the PKGBUILD script by myself.

2 3

[aur-general] package delete
by Jonathan Arnold 15 May '13

15 May '13

The mitter blogging platfrom no longer exists: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mitter-alpha/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mitter-git/ Please delete these packages. -- Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan

2 1

[aur-general] Merge Request: cross-arm-none-eabi-{binutils, gcc, gdb}
by Martin Schmölzer 15 May '13

15 May '13

Hi! In accordance with the naming guidelines for cross compiling tool packages [1], I have renamed and re-uploaded my cross-arm-none-eabi-{binutils,gcc,gdb} packages to arm-none-eabi-{binutils,gcc,gdb}. Please merge the old packages [2][3][4] into the new ones [5][6][7]. Thanks! Best regards, Martin [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Cross_Compiling_Tools_Package_Guidelin… [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cross-arm-none-eabi-gdb/ [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arm-none-eabi-binutils/ [6] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arm-none-eabi-gcc/ [7] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arm-none-eabi-gdb/

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: coq-nogui
by zerstorer＠free.fr 15 May '13

15 May '13

Hi, Please remove `coq-nogui` [1]. It's a duplicate of `coq-nox` [2], which has a cleaner PKGBUILD and is more in line with the other coq packages (`coq` [3], `coq-doc` [4]). The current maintainer of `coq-nogui` (Cc-ed) is ok with the removal. Thanks! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/coq-nogui [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/coq-nox [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/coq [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/coq-doc

2 1

[aur-general] Request package deletion
by Padfoot 15 May '13

15 May '13

Hi, I am the maintainer of the following packages: lightdm-gtk3-greeter-devel https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightdm-gtk3-greeter-devel/ lightdm-gtk2-greeter-devel https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightdm-gtk2-greeter-devel/ I have disowned the packages and request their deletion as they are now exactly the same as the versions in Community. Thanks. Lachlan.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request [spread]
by Brian F. G. Bidulock 15 May '13

15 May '13

Please remove spread package at: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spread/ This package is no longer different than: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spread-daemon/ --brian

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 May '13

15 May '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * collectd-5.3.0-2 (i686) * nsd-3.2.15-2 (i686) * unbound-1.4.20-2 (i686) * collectd-5.3.0-2 (x86_64) * nsd-3.2.15-2 (x86_64) * unbound-1.4.20-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * collectd-5.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nsd-3.2.15-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * unbound-1.4.20-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * collectd-5.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nsd-3.2.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * unbound-1.4.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686), since 2013-03-14 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64), since 2013-03-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 24 signoffs 2. tomegun - 11 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Can't login to account 'DarkFox', password reset useless.
by James McGlashan 15 May '13

15 May '13

Hello, I have made multiple attempts to login to my account on the AUR, with no luck. Tried resetting my password (multiple times), still didn't let me login. This has nothing to do with cache on my end, browsing in firefox with private browsing through a ssh tunnel to another server. Any suggestion or explanation to the issue? Note: I can still login to 'archeydevil' which is an abandaned account. Please delete (there are no packages linked to it anyhow). Cheers, DarkFox

1 0

[aur-general] "Please merge the (orphaned) hotot-qt-git to hotot-qt4-git"
by Yichao Yu 14 May '13

14 May '13

Hotot supports qt5 (hotot-qt5) now. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hotot-qt/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hotot-qt-git/

2 2

[aur-general] proftpd
by Alexander Rødseth 14 May '13

14 May '13

Hi, I wish to give proftpd to a TU/Dev or move it to unsupported if there is no interest for it. Any takers? -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 May '13

14 May '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * inn-2.5.3-5 (i686) * libvirt-1.0.5-4 (i686) * squid-3.3.4-3 (i686) * inn-2.5.3-5 (x86_64) * libvirt-1.0.5-4 (x86_64) * squid-3.3.4-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * autofs-5.0.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * inn-2.5.3-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libmemcached-1.0.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libvirt-1.0.5-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * squid-3.3.4-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * znc-1.0-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * autofs-5.0.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * inn-2.5.3-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libmemcached-1.0.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-1.0.5-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * squid-3.3.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * znc-1.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686), since 2013-03-14 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64), since 2013-03-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 13 signoffs 2. bisson - 9 signoffs 3. dan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Request ownership transfer and/or merge
by |^ `/ () () | ( (-) | 14 May '13

14 May '13

Hello! I was wondering if you could possibly transfer my ownership of my 'archtrack' AUR package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archtrack/) to "EvanTeitelman" (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=EvanTeitelman&SeB=m)? Another possibility would be to merge Evan's 'archtrack-all' package into the 'archtrack' package and make him the owner. Evan, please respond if you have any preference. Thanks! -- |^ `/ () () | ( (-) |

3 2

[aur-general] python2-crack question
by Gabriel B. Casella 13 May '13

13 May '13

Hello everyone, I have adopted my first package[1] on AUR (=D) and would like to know if is there a need to increase the "pkgrel" variable as I fixed a small error in the "build()" and "package()" functions. Also, I changed the sums to SHA256 instead of MD5. By the way, this package has the MIT/X license (python stuff) and I've seen on the PKGBUILD wiki [2] that, in this case, the license should be stored in /usr/share/licenses/pkg. But, would this be just copying it to the folder or what? Sincerely, [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-crack/ [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#license *---* *Gabriel B. Casella* "Nothing is impossible, impossible just takes longer"

3 5

[aur-general] Merge stjerm in stjerm-git
by Diego Principe 13 May '13

13 May '13

Please merge stjerm in stjerm-git because git now is the only source avaiable. *Diego*

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 May '13

13 May '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * znc-1.0-6 (i686) * znc-1.0-6 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * autofs-5.0.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcron-3.1.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * inn-2.5.3-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libmemcached-1.0.16-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libvirt-1.0.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * squid-3.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * znc-1.0-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * autofs-5.0.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcron-3.1.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * inn-2.5.3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libmemcached-1.0.16-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-1.0.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * squid-3.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * znc-1.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * oss-4.2_2007-3 (i686), since 2013-03-14 * oss-4.2_2007-3 (x86_64), since 2013-03-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown 'rethinkdb' aur package
by Anatol Pomozov 12 May '13

12 May '13

Hi, rethinkdb is a great alternative to mongodb. There is an aur package for it https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rethinkdb Unfortunately it is out-of-date for almost 2 months now. The current maintainer does not respond to upgrade requests. Please disown the package, I would like to become its maintainer and keep it improving. Thanks.

2 1