- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] remove requet (teamviewer8)
by Jorge Barroso 24 Feb '13

24 Feb '13

Hi, I think we should remove teamviewer8[1], as there's already a teamviewer[2] package up to date with the same version... https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/teamviewer8/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/teamviewer/ [2] thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Nuno Araujo 23 Feb '13

23 Feb '13

Could you please remove the following packages: [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bzr-fastimport-deleted-entries-fix/ [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-fastimport-bzr/ [1] applied a patch that is now available upstream. [2] is a source control version of python2-fastimport which was necessary for building [1]. Thanks -- Nuno Araujo <nuno.araujo(a)russo79.com>

2 1

[aur-general] deletion request
by David Adler 23 Feb '13

23 Feb '13

please delete chino-preset-default, it ceased to exist as an installable package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chino-preset-default/ thanks.

6 12

[aur-general] Disowning synergy
by Jelle van der Waa 23 Feb '13

23 Feb '13

Hi TU's, I am disowning synergy, since I don't use it with my current setup and can't test it properly. Is anyone interested in maintaining it else I will move it into AUR.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Feb '13

23 Feb '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * boinc-7.0.53-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-38 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130219-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-24 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.53-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-38 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130219-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-24 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-7 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (1 total) == * steam-1.0.0.28-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * weston-1.0.5-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * weston-1.0.5-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown Request for ec2-ami-tools
by Don deJuan 23 Feb '13

23 Feb '13

ec2-ami-tools was originally marked out of date on 11-28-2012 I emailed the package owner well over 2 weeks ago now (1-31-2013). I would like to take over the package and have a working PKGBUILD already. I am the maintainer for ec2-api-tools already so would be nice to start getting the ami package back to being updated and useable on the AUR again. I have attached the PKGBUILD of what I am running locally on my system, in case the PKGBUILD needs to be reviewed. Thank you for your time, vwyodajl

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request
by Hyacinthe Cartiaux 22 Feb '13

22 Feb '13

Hello, Could you please disown ruby-ffi[0]. The package is outdated and the maintainer has not answered to my mail. Thanks Hyacinthe [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-ffi/ Le vendredi 8 février 2013 15:20:48 Hyacinthe Cartiaux a écrit : > Hi, > > Could you please update ruby-ffi[0] ? > I can also adopt it if you prefer. > > Thanks, > > Best, > > Hyacinthe > > [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-ffi/

1 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Feb '13

22 Feb '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * boinc-7.0.53-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-38 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130219-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-24 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.53-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-38 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130219-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-24 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-7 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (1 total) == * steam-1.0.0.28-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * weston-1.0.5-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * weston-1.0.5-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 10 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 3 signoffs 3. dan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request
by OmeGa 22 Feb '13

22 Feb '13

Could you please disown ruby-jist [1]. I flagged it as out of date on Dec 02. I sent an email to the maintainer over two weeks ago, and still no response. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-jist/

2 1

[aur-general] Please orphan all of tebo's packages
by Kevin Vesga 22 Feb '13

22 Feb '13

He or she hasn't really been active since 2008, and his or her listed email address results in a delivery failure. https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tebo

2 1

[aur-general] iceweasel rename request
by Jorge Barroso 21 Feb '13

21 Feb '13

Could you please rename iceweasel as iceweasel-bin? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iceweasel/

2 2

[aur-general] Packages need to be deleted
by atilla ontas 21 Feb '13

21 Feb '13

Hi, i'm maintainer of most zemberek related packages. I have decided to rename some packages and old ones should be deleted: zemberek-server-nolibs, zemberek-nolibs, enchant-zemberek Also, mozzemberek and mozzemberek-svn won't work firefox-4.0 and above versions. Development stopped upstream. Also, zpspell package won't needed anymore to zemberek run. Please delete those as well. Thank you.

2 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Feb '13

21 Feb '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 20 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 27 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (20 total) == * boinc-7.0.53-1 (i686) * cdfs-2.6.27-38 (i686) * ndiswrapper-1.58-2 (i686) * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-6 (i686) * r8168-8.035.00-5 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-24 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-15 (i686) * vhba-module-20120422-18 (i686) * virtualbox-4.2.6-3 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-7 (i686) * boinc-7.0.53-1 (x86_64) * cdfs-2.6.27-38 (x86_64) * ndiswrapper-1.58-2 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-6 (x86_64) * r8168-8.035.00-5 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-24 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-15 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20120422-18 (x86_64) * virtualbox-4.2.6-3 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-7 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (24 total) == * boinc-7.0.53-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-38 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130219-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-24 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.2.6-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.53-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-38 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130219-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.58-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-24 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.2.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (1 total) == * steam-1.0.0.28-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * weston-1.0.5-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * weston-1.0.5-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 1 signoffs 2. eric - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Forgotten AUR username
by Emil Kverndal 20 Feb '13

20 Feb '13

I've forgotten the AUR username attached to this mail. Is it possible to get it recovered or reset?

2 1

[aur-general] [removal] Projectm-pulseaudio and projectm-qt
by Denis A. Altoé Falqueto 20 Feb '13

20 Feb '13

Guys, Those two packages are provided by community as of today, thanks to Alexander Rødseth, who is the new maintainer of projectm. They're being built as a split package from projectm. projectm-pulseaudio: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/projectm-pulseaudio/ projectm-qt: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/projectm-qt/ Thanks! -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? For more information, please read: http://idallen.com/topposting.html ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto Linux user #524555 -------------------------------------------

3 2

[aur-general] Merge Requests
by Stefan Husmann 20 Feb '13

20 Feb '13

2 3

[aur-general] Merge request
by Thomas Kuther 20 Feb '13

20 Feb '13

Hello TUs, please merge my old package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/globalmenu-extension/ into the new one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-extension-globalmenu/ Many thanks in advance. ~tom

2 1

[aur-general] Delete package
by Padfoot 20 Feb '13

20 Feb '13

Hi, Can we please have the package lightdm-gtk-greeter-osk deleted? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightdm-gtk-greeter-osk/ The on-screen keyboard functionality is now present in lightdm-gtk-greeter and lightdm-gtk2-greeter. Cheers. Lachlan.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Feb '13

20 Feb '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130219-1 (i686) * llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130219-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * boinc-7.0.52-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130219-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.52-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * llvm-amdgpu-snapshot-20130219-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (1 total) == * steam-1.0.0.28-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * weston-1.0.5-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * weston-1.0.5-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 2 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs 3. ronald - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request: thc-hydra
by Rudy Matela 20 Feb '13

20 Feb '13

Hello, Hydra was outdated, so I've stepped in as maintainer of hydra [1]. Turns out there is another package (thc-hydra [2]) which was created to be an updated version of hydra while the last maintainer was not working on it, quoting from the first comment on it: > "This is an updated version of the original package [1] > > I made this package because the original one was flagged as outdatted for more than 1 month and no one recived response from the submitter/maintainer." Since it does not apply anymore I think thc-hydra [2] should be deleted. It is interesting to note: thc-hydra is also outdated. Regards, Rudy [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hydra/ [2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thc-hydra/ PS: This is related to the orphan request I did minutes ago: Orphan request: hydra

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request: hydra
by Rudy Matela 19 Feb '13

19 Feb '13

Hello, The package hydra [1] is outdated. It was last updated on 2011 (7.1) and there has been a new hydra version for some time, the last one 7.4.2 for two months. It's been flagged out-of-date for almost two years. There is a new version posted in the comments for four months also. With no response from the maintainer. Can you please disown the package for a new maintainer to take over? Regards, Rudy [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hydra/

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal request] openoffice-pl-bin
by Krzysztof Grygiencz 19 Feb '13

19 Feb '13

Hi, Can someone delete my package openoffice-pl-bin [1] because it's out of date and will not be maintained anymore. As a replacement I've uploaded new package [2] - openoffice-base-bin-pl. [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openoffice-pl-bin/ [2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openoffice-base-bin-pl/ Regards, Krzysztof Grygiencz (kfgz)

2 1

[aur-general] disown request : razor-qt-git
by Jekyll Wu 19 Feb '13

19 Feb '13

It is in 2012-03-06, almost one year ago, that this -git package is last updated. Considering that the upstream development is quite active and many more dependencies have been introduced, this package is currently in a quite bad form (just compare the dependencies with that of razor-qt to get the idea). I'm not sure the status of the maintainer, but since the packages was marked as out-of-date in 2012-12-24 and still no change since then, I would see that maintainer as inactive. In case someone asks, I haven't and won't send a private mail for contact. If one maintainer is not interested in notifications from the package he/she is maintaining, I can hardly believe he/she could/would maintain that package well. So it is up to you guys to decide. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/razor-qt https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/razor-qt-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal: eclipse-scala-ide-juno-nightly
by Kristof Jozsa 19 Feb '13

19 Feb '13

Hi, I'm the maintainer of the eclipse-scala-ide and eclipse-scala-ide-juno-nightly packages and would like to ask for removing the latter. The package eclipse-scala-ide have been tracking the so-so stable version of the upstream package (scala-ide.org) When Arch had the transition to Eclipse Juno and Scala IDE had an up-to-date nightly and a way obsolete stable version supporting only the previous Eclipse, I created eclipse-scala-ide-juno-nightly to allow Arch user scala hackers to develop with a usable tool. As of the current situation, Scala IDE is back to stable milestone releases, and I'm planning to track them via the eclipse-scala-ide package. Therefore, eclipse-scala-ide-juno-nightly is no longer needed. Thanks, K

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Feb '13

19 Feb '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * boinc-7.0.52-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-13.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.52-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-13.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xvba-video-open-0.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (1 total) == * steam-1.0.0.28-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * weston-1.0.5-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * weston-1.0.5-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 8 signoffs

1 0