- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Away until December 31st
by Lukas Fleischer 23 Dec '12

23 Dec '12

Hi Trusted Users and developers, I will be on vacation from December 25th to December 31st. Feel free to update/fix my packages while I'm away -- I don't expect to have internet access. Regards, Lukas

1 0

[aur-general] Orphan/merge request [Dec 23]
by Limao Luo 23 Dec '12

23 Dec '12

Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-xattr/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-xattr-git/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-xattr/ The 2 packages to be merged were incorrectly named, and I have adopted them for expediency's sake. Also, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/liblognorm https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libumberlog/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libumberlog-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rsyslog-zmq/ should be orphaned (2 weeks of no email response/update, all the same maintainer - who is inactive AFAIK, and 3 of these packages have been out-of-date since April, while 1 since September). Thanks in advance.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Schala Zeal 23 Dec '12

23 Dec '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/allegro_pas/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fpc-i386-win32-allegro_pas/ I slightly altered the package name in both, and it should be safe to remove considering as no votes or comments reside in these.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Dec '12

23 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686), since 2012-12-05 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-05 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 3 signoffs 2. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] AUR Disownment Request
by Unsolved Cypher 23 Dec '12

23 Dec '12

Hello, I would like to request that the aur package minecraft-server ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/minecraft-server/) be disowned. I would love to adopt this package, as it hasn't been updated since August. I contacted the maintainer over two weeks ago, and have not received a reply. Below is the email that I sent him. If this is not the right place or if I am doing something wrong, please let me know. NOTE: I appologize for initially sending this to arch-general, that was a mistake. Thanks, ~UnsolvedCypher ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Unsolved Cypher <unsolvedcypher(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:57 PM Subject: minecraft-server To: florian.leger6(a)gmail.com Fleger, Could you please update minecraft-server in the AUR? Thanks, ~UnsolvedCypher

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Axilleas Pi 23 Dec '12

23 Dec '12

Please remove python-sendfile [0], it has no home page, no license info. The information in PKGBUILD is taken from another similar package [1] which I just uploaded [2]. Thanks. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-sendfile/ [1] http://code.google.com/p/pysendfile/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pysendfile/

4 3

[aur-general] Delete request
by Νίκος Θεοδώρου 22 Dec '12

22 Dec '12

Could you please delete my package plasma-xfce-theme ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plasma-xfce-theme/ )? I have already uploaded gtk-theme-plasma-shock-bolt-fire ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-plasma-shock-bolt-fire/ ) which, I believe, is a much more appropriate name. Thanks. -- Νίκος Θεοδώρου «Ἀγεωμέτρητος μηδεὶς εἰσίτω!»

2 1

[aur-general] TU Application - Daniel Micay (thestinger)
by danielmicay＠gmail.com 22 Dec '12

22 Dec '12

Hello! This is my application to be a Trusted User. My name is Daniel Micay, and I am a 20 year old living in Toronto. Dave Reisner (falconindy) is my sponsor. My username on the wiki, github and the forums is thestinger, and I go by either thestinger or strcat on IRC. I started using Linux in 2008/2009 and Arch was the first distribution I liked enough to install outside of a VM. I quickly fell in love with the elegance of vanilla, up-to-date packages and eventually moved away from a more traditional desktop environment to awesome and then i3. Linux was my gateway into programming, as I picked up shell scripting and that eventually led to learning Python. At the moment I mostly use C++ and Python, but I have an interest in Haskell and more recently Rust. I began contributing back to the community in 2010 by putting my efforts into improving the wiki, and in September of 2011 I joined the ArchWiki administration team. At some point I became quite active on the #archlinux channel, and I do my best to disseminate tidbits of knowledge that I've picked up there. The following are packages that I use and would like to maintain in [community]: * rust * libgit2 * uwsgi and the official plugins (split package) * faenza-icon-theme * intel-gpu-tools * ohcount * namebench * transmission-remote-cli * sparsehash * ttf-symbola * python-libgit2 and python2-libgit2 (split package) * python-scrypt and python2-scrypt (split package) * python-bottle and python2-bottle (split package) * httpie (not a library, so just python3) * libxkbcommon * kmscon (the tagged release, only -git is in the AUR) * ncrack * reaver * vim-indent-object * vim-fugitive * vim-systemd * zenburn and solarized vim colorschemes ... and in the future: * various rust libraries * libc++ (currently no stable release) * libc++abi (linux support is a work-in-progress) * vim-clang-complete (it needs a new stable release) All of these are under free licenses, and most currently meet the 10 vote threshold (some would have to wait a bit). I would also like to look into having the Android SDK in [community], but the number of licenses it uses is really a mess and I doubt Google's pre-built version can (or should) be redistributed as-is. Thanks for considering my application! :)

10 12

[aur-general] Orphan request: iscan-plugin-gt-s600
by Peter Hofmann 22 Dec '12

22 Dec '12

Hi, the package [0] is outdated. A while ago, I offered to take over the package in a comment (2012-10-06) and emailed the current maintainer some time later (2012-11-17). I got no response, though. I got a working and updated PKGBUILD [1]. Could you please orphan iscan-plugin-gt-s600 so I can adopt it? Thanks! Peter / Vain [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iscan-plugin-gt-s600/ [1] https://github.com/vain/packages/tree/master/arch/private/iscan-plugin-gt-s…

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Dec '12

22 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686), since 2012-12-05 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-05 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Dec '12

21 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686), since 2012-12-05 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-05 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Suggestions for dealing with packages that require root
by Phillip Smith 20 Dec '12

20 Dec '12

Hi all, I'm after some suggestions for how to deal with packages (namely amanda [1]) that require root to build. In this particular instance, amanda needs the user/group that it will run under to be present at compile time. Less than ideal, but that's what upstream gives us. At the moment, I check if the user/group 'amanda' already exist, and if not, create them. This has the side effect that makepkg needs to be run as root if the user/group doesn't exist. I then cleanup (delete) the user/group at the end if I created them. That's messy enough already, but it's been suggested that I use sudo to handle the user add/delete parts to make the PKGBUILD friendlier to AUR helpers. I know helpers needs to work with PKGBUILD's, not PKGBUILD's made to work with helpers, but perhaps there is a middle-ground where we can all eat our cake? ;) I don't want to include sudo as a makedepends since it requires configuration to work properly, nor do I want to make the PKGBUILD "intelligent" to try and auto-detect a privilege escalation tool (sudo or su) which will lead to a bigger mess. Does anyone have a smarter/cleaner/easier way to deal with this scenario? Cheers, ~p [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/am/amanda/PKGBUILD

5 6

[aur-general] Compiling with UTF-8 symbols in build path
by Paul Weingardt 20 Dec '12

20 Dec '12

Hello, I just got a comment on my git-cola package, stating that the compilation fails, when the path to the PKGBUILD contains a UTF-8 symbol like the Euro "€" symbol. Example: The PKGBUILD is located under "/home/paul/€uro/". "cd" into that directory and execute makepkg. I am really sure, that this is an upstream problem (I guess it is even an issue in python2-spinx) and I can't solve it. Would someone take a look at it please? Here is the error message: Exception occurred: File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx/environment.py", line 758, in read_doc pub.set_source(None, src_path.encode(fs_encoding)) UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 25: ordinal not in range(128) Just tryed it out: fs_encoding is "UTF-8" on my machine. And help is appreciated. nobody44

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Dec '12

20 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686), since 2012-12-05 * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64), since 2012-12-05 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 6 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs 3. dan - 2 signoffs 4. stephane - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Compiling emacs lisp files
by Mika Fischer 20 Dec '12

20 Dec '12

Hi, I'm currently maintaining the ninja package on the AUR [1]. Recently, there has been an issue about which I'd like to ask for your advice: ninja contains an files for emacs to support edititng the rules files of ninja. A user suggested that I compile the provided .el file to an .elc file. I did that, but then other users complained about the build-dependency on emacs. Now another user suggested that in the PKGBUILD, I should check whether emacs is installed and only then compile the .el file. I'm not totally opposed to this, but it feels a bit strange that the package is different, depending on the system it's built on. What would you do in this situation? Thanks in advance! Best, Mika [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ninja/

5 4

[aur-general] Could anyone help me to adopt 'fossil' package?
by Daniel YC Lin 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

It is outdated for more then one month.

2 1

[aur-general] Delete suckless *-hg packages (suckless.org has moved to git)
by Andreas Wagner 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

Hello, I have uploaded dmenu-git and and dmc-git to replace dmenu-hg and dmc-hg because suckless.org has moved to git. Could someone here delete the following packages: dmenu-hg dmc-hg Eventually, we should move the rest of the packages over too. Thanks, Andreas

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Dec '12

19 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 7 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 3. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Remove (orphaned) pyhyphen and rename python-pysrt
by Veli-Jussi Raitila 18 Dec '12

18 Dec '12

Please remove the pyhyphen package (superceded by python-pyhyphen / python2-pyhyphen) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyhyphen/ Also rename python-pysrt to python2-pysrt https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pysrt/ Thanks! -- BR, VJ

2 3

[aur-general] Remove request for python2-distutils2
by Lucas Saliés Brum 18 Dec '12

18 Dec '12

Maybe duplicated? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-distutils2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-distutils2/ Original?: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/python2-distutils-extra/ The last one from AUR is outdated. Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] A TU keeps removing harmless and relevant comments from my package's webpage
by Xavion 18 Dec '12

18 Dec '12

Dear TUs & Devs, For obvious reasons, I decided to add the following comment to my popular-packages <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popular-packages/>webpage on the AUR recently: "As I'm the author of this little script, I will always want it to remain in the AUR". However, I just noticed that the comment has been removed. I'm assuming that Alexander (xyproto) <https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xyproto>probably did this (silently) as he's the one who removed all prior comments a couple of days earlier. I'm not suggesting that my package will become popular enough to enter [community]. I just have a policy of adding a comment like the one listed above after uploading something that I authored. Can someone explain why the TU who removed the above comment considered it so off-topic that it had to go? Based on the nature of the comment, I think the decision to remove it was a bit extreme. Can someone please reinstate the comment to that webpage? If it was Alexander who removed it, I'd also like to know whether he has anything better to do with his time than troll and nitpick like this. -- Regards, Xavion.

8 11

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Dec '12

18 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 3 signoffs 2. allan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Duplicate package php-mongodb
by Jarek Sedlacek 17 Dec '12

17 Dec '12

Package php-mongodb [1] is a duplicate of php-mongo[2]. I emailed the maintainer of php-mongodb, he is fine with the it being merged into php-mongo. Can these be merged (or php-mongodb deleted)? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-mongodb/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-mongo/ Thanks, Jarek Sedlacek

2 1

[aur-general] [Package Removal Request] reviewboard-django-pipeline
by Artyom Olshevskiy 17 Dec '12

17 Dec '12

Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/reviewboard-django-pipeline. It was a temp package to satisfy reviewboard dependency. Not needed now since I owned the original django-pipeline package. Thanks in advance.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Dec '12

17 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 22 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pdns-recursor-3.3-5 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdns-recursor-3.3-5 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 6 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 3 signoffs 3. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0