- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Merge Request: java-jce_ustrength7 > java-jce_ustrength
by kevku 17 Dec '12

17 Dec '12

Since java7 is now the default one, these are the same package so drop java-jce_ustrength7. If anyone needs it for java6 they should make a java-jce_ustrength6 package. ~kev

2 1

[aur-general] Remove request for python-tofu
by Aaron DeVore 17 Dec '12

17 Dec '12

Tofu has been folded into python2-soya, so it is no longer needed. -Aaron DeVore

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Dec '12

16 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 22 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pdns-recursor-3.3-5 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdns-recursor-3.3-5 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: flake8-python3 => flake8.
by Karol Woźniak 16 Dec '12

16 Dec '12

Python3 version is now maintained in the main flake8 package [1], so the other one [2] is redundant. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flake8/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flake8/ -- Karol "Kenji Takahashi" Woźniak <kenji.sx>

3 3

[aur-general] Package Removal from AUR
by Ezra Sharp 16 Dec '12

16 Dec '12

hey Can I get this package removed please? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/webissues-client/ Its an exact duplicate of one I already uploaded with a similar name. (Also uploaded by me) -- - Cheers, Ezra.

2 2

[aur-general] Naming convention for Python 2 and 3 apps
by Allen Li 16 Dec '12

16 Dec '12

Hi everybody, I know that the naming convention for python libraries is python(2)-*, but do we have a convention for python applications installed for different python versions? The package in question is flake8, which can be installed for both Python 2 and 3. Allen Li

7 13

[aur-general] Updated: cGmail
by Lucas Saliés Brum 15 Dec '12

15 Dec '12

Can someone point out possible errors in my package? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cgmail/ I created a patch to fix this BUG: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cgmail/+bug/715507 Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Please delele my packages
by Trần Đức Nam 15 Dec '12

15 Dec '12

I submit 2 wrong package are stardict-vi-jp and stardict-jp-vi. So I need to remove they. Please help for me! Thank you very much. [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stardict-vi-jp/ [2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stardict-jp-vi/

2 1

[aur-general] Searching for maintainer for python-selenium and python2-selenium
by Aaron DeVore 15 Dec '12

15 Dec '12

I am currently the maintainer for the Selenium packages. Currently, I'm only version bumping. I simply don't have the resources and knowledge to test. I don't even use Selenium. I am now looking for a new maintainer who has more knowledge in Selenium. If no one steps forward, I will continue doing simple version bumps. -Aaron DeVore

2 1

[aur-general] remove request for python2-obspy-svn
by Dmitry Kalinkin 15 Dec '12

15 Dec '12

For deletion: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-obspy-svn/ Project has migrated to git, so this don't work anymore. Git version is already available ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-obspy-git/ ). Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Dec '12

15 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 22 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pdns-recursor-3.3-5 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdns-recursor-3.3-5 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Dec '12

14 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 22 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pdns-recursor-3.3-5 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdns-recursor-3.3-5 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 2 signoffs 2. arodseth - 2 signoffs 3. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal of AUR package ttf-inconsolata-xl
by George Hilliard 13 Dec '12

13 Dec '12

Hello, I mistakenly uploaded a package, ttf-inconsolata-xl, to the AUR. I had meant to upload a different one. Nobody is using it; I uploaded it not ten minutes ago. Could I get it removed? The font it installs isn't very useful, as the font's ONLY mode is bold; there is no regular option. Thanks!

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Dec '12

13 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 22 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * pdns-recursor-3.3-5 (i686) * pdns-recursor-3.3-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (22 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pdns-recursor-3.3-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdns-recursor-3.3-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 2 signoffs 2. bluewind - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package removal: lxdm-light
by Johannes Löthberg 13 Dec '12

13 Dec '12

lxdm-light is a *kit free lxdm, but this package is no longer necessary, no? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxdm-light/ -- Kindest Regards, Johannes "Kyrias" Löthberg Key ID: D84845F1 595C 8E08 DAE1 4A56 492C F750 BE76 C444 D848 45F1

2 1

[aur-general] Disowning pkgs
by Simon Stoakley 12 Dec '12

12 Dec '12

Hello all, I'm going travelling soon for a year or so and its highly unlikely I've have any network access to look after my pkgs (or the inclination TBH!). Some of the pkgs are reasonably popular/active so rather just orphaning the lot I thought I'd see here if any one wants to take any of them before I disown the lot. Keep Arch warm for me while I'm gone! ;) Simon https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=m&K=sausageandeggs Pkgnames appmenu-gtk cairo-dock-plug-ins-extras cbrpager covergloobus everygui fbzx gnofract4d guayadeque-svn kawoken-icons kde-thumbnailer-epub kdebase-dolphin-klook kdeplasma-applets-activitymanager kdeplasma-applets-sliderlauncher kupfer-mpris2-plugin mpris2-git playitslowly pydbusdecorator-git x-tile xcursor-bw3d xcursor-dasblack xcursor-ecliz

3 4

[aur-general] several requests
by Kevin Vesga 12 Dec '12

12 Dec '12

First lua5.2[1] from the AUR can be deleted since lua in Extra has been updated. Second there are two outdated packages: rsyslog-dev[2] and thinkhdaps[3] that I would like orphaned. I have contacted the maintainers on Nov 20, but they have neither updated the packages, orhpaned them, nor responded back. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua5.2/ [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rsyslog-dev/ [3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thinkhdaps/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Dec '12

12 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 14 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (14 total) == * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.034.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 3 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: perl-config-ini-mvp
by Jason St. John 12 Dec '12

12 Dec '12

I am requesting that perl-config-ini-mvp[1] be deleted because the source link 404s. It seems like upstream may have renamed it to [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-config-ini-mvp/ [2] http://search.cpan.org/~rjbs/Config-MVP-Reader-INI/ Thanks, Jason

1 0

[aur-general] Question file conflict on a new package I took over
by Don deJuan 11 Dec '12

11 Dec '12

I just recently took over a package[1], and some people are having troubles updating due to file system conflict. error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) uuid: /usr/lib/libuuid.a exists in filesystem uuid: /usr/lib/libuuid.so exists in filesystem uuid: /usr/lib/pkgconfig/uuid.pc exists in filesystem uuid: /usr/share/man/man3/uuid.3.gz exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. What is the actual proper way to handle a conflict like this? As a temp workaround I found that if I removed the package and then deleted those files left behind I can get it to install and all seems kosher after. But that is a ugly workaround. Would the correct way be to use a .install file and then a pre_install hook to get rid of them? Thanks a bunch for any help or tips here. [1]uuid <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/uuid/>

3 3

[aur-general] Bash scripts in tarball
by Johannes Löthberg 11 Dec '12

11 Dec '12

Hello, You are not allowed to include binaries and the source of packages in tarballs uploaded to the AUR, this also includes bash scripts of only a few KBs, no? -- Kindest Regards, Johannes Löthberg

4 5

[aur-general] Some todos
by Stefan Husmann 11 Dec '12

11 Dec '12

Hello, please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vala-devel/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vala-018/ There is no "unstable" or "devel" package upstream for vala, so vala-018 might be the better name. There are other valas following the same naming scheme. Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-gnuplot-mode-cvs/ The emacs mode is part of the most gnuplot packages. Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnuplot-git/ Uploaded accidentely. Please orphan https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/oleo-motif/ and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/oleo/ The download-url for the patches is no longer available as stated in the comments. There already was a discussion all the packages of the maintainer tdy on this list. Best Regards Stefan

2 3

[aur-general] Disown request - bzr-fastimport
by Martin Wimpress 11 Dec '12

11 Dec '12

Hi, Please can you disown the `bzr-import` package in the AUR. * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bzr-fastimport/ The package is flagged as out-of-date, I've contacted the current maintainer but had no response and I have an up-to-date package ready to go. -- Regards, Martin.

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Naming convention for Python 2 and 3 apps
by Lone_Wolf 11 Dec '12

11 Dec '12

> It seems that none cares after all, huh? > But I still do want to do it as right as it can possibly be, mostly > because > I now need flake8 for both python 2 and 3. > So if nobody complains, I'll go with my initial thought (see my previous > post here) sometime near the end of the week. > > On 29 November 2012 07:09, Karol Wo¼niak <wozniakk(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> OK, I'm back for a moment, so, as a maintainer of flake8 package, I >> guess >> I should write something here >> (and hope gmail won't mess the nesting. I still don't know how it works >> here...). >> >> Coming to think about it, there IS a library in flake8. I mean, most >> people will just run the exec and be fine, but if you really need, you >> can >> import things from flake8 package and run it from inside the interpreter >> (which is what the exec does, anyway). >> That said, I think the closest follow up for us are python(2)-pip >> packages >> from [extra]. So, while I was a bit against it, I now think the best >> thing >> we can do is to pick up the python(2)-* convention. >> >> That still leaves one issue, though. To allow the packages to coexist, >> we >> should rename python2 exec to "flake82". Maybe it's just me, but it >> looks >> weird. And besides that, I don't know how other apps (e.g. syntax >> checking >> plugins for editors) using flake8 will behave. Syntastic has a way to >> change the exec used for checking, but I don't know about the others. >> >> >> Xyne wrote: >> >> >While we're on the subject, can someone please explain to me again why >> we >> use >> >"python-" and not "python3-" for Python 3 libraries? >> >> This way, if py4 ever comes out, this will make us a new bunch of mess >> and >> a whole lot of work to do again. Isn't that great? >> >> -- >> Karol "Kenji Takahashi" Wo¼niak <http://kenji.sx> >> > > > > -- > Pozdrawiam, > Karol Wo¼niak > > Karol, naming is more an arch issue then an aur/community one. Maybe post this on arch-dev-public ? LW

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Dec '12

11 Dec '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 2 fully signed off packages * 73 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * luakit-2012.09.13.r1-5 (i686) * luakit-2012.09.13.r1-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (71 total) == * curlpaste-1.2.1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * luadoc-3.0.1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * lualogging-1.1.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * luarocks-2.0.12-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * megaglest-data-3.7.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * vicious-2.1.0-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * wesnoth-data-1.10.5-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.13-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * btanks-0.9.8083-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cegui-0.7.7-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * electricsheep-2.7b33-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * elinks-0.13-11 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fillets-ng-1.0.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * grafx2-2.4-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * hedgewars-0.9.18-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * highlight-3.12-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-pinyin-1.4.99.20120808-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * instead-1.8.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lua-zlib-0.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luabitop-1.0.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luaexpat-1.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luafilesystem-1.6.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luakit-2012.09.13.r1-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luaposix-5.1.23-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luasec-0.4.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luasocket-2.0.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * megaglest-3.7.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * notion-20121114-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ntop-5.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pdns-3.1-4 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * prosody-0.8.2-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * stone-soup-0.11.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * task-2.1.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wesnoth-1.10.5-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * widelands-17-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xmoto-0.5.10-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.13-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * btanks-0.9.8083-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cegui-0.7.7-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * electricsheep-2.7b33-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * elinks-0.13-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fillets-ng-1.0.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * grafx2-2.4-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * hedgewars-0.9.18-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * highlight-3.12-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ibus-pinyin-1.4.99.20120808-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * instead-1.8.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lua-zlib-0.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luabitop-1.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luaexpat-1.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luafilesystem-1.6.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luakit-2012.09.13.r1-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luaposix-5.1.23-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luasec-0.4.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luasocket-2.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * megaglest-3.7.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * notion-20121114-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ntop-5.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdns-3.1-4 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * prosody-0.8.2-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * stone-soup-0.11.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * task-2.1.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wesnoth-1.10.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * widelands-17-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xmoto-0.5.10-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * luasql-2.2.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luasql-2.2.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (2 total) == * geany-plugins-1.22-4 (i686) * geany-plugins-1.22-4 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 3 signoffs

1 0