- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Deletion request: anything-sync-daemon-systemd
by Limao Luo 22 Sep '12

22 Sep '12

anything-sync-daemon-systemd [1] duplicates functionality from the original anything-sync-daemon [2] package (i.e. the systemd script is now included). [1] is therefore obsolete. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60949 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58263

2 1

[aur-general] removal request - monitorix-sync-daemon
by member graysky 22 Sep '12

22 Sep '12

Plz delete. I have discontinued supporting this deamon since its functionality is covered under its bigger brother, anything-sync-daemon. Supporting three sync-daemons was getting to be a hassle. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55072

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Sep '12

22 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * catfish-0.4.0.2-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * catfish-0.4.0.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120915-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 6 signoffs 2. allan - 3 signoffs 3. stativ - 3 signoffs 4. dreisner - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Taking over abandoned / OOD package in AUR: id3ed
by Carlos Rivas 22 Sep '12

22 Sep '12

AUR General Group: The package id3ed located in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25040 has been marked "out of date" and, I strongly believe, abandoned by the current maintainer. The URLs that are posted in the "Package Details" page are 404-ing (except for the TARBALL / PKGBUILD and "ncurses"). Attempts to reach the maintainer result in 550s: Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: surma(a)drebesium.org Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 Unrouteable address (state 13). I'd like to take over as package maintainer. Please advise on what steps I can take to adopt this abandoned package. Thanks! Carlos R.

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: gitpython
by Jon Bergli Heier 21 Sep '12

21 Sep '12

Hi, please merge gitpython[1] to python2-gitpython[2]. The package was resubmitted some time ago to comply with the python package guidelines[3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41988 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58004 [3] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python_Package_Guidelines

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: python2-hxd
by Schala Zeal 21 Sep '12

21 Sep '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61474 The project's actual name is phxd and I've resubmitted this package under that name to reflect that.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Sep '12

21 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120915-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: old peazip PKGBUILDs
by Limao Luo 21 Sep '12

21 Sep '12

This is a deletion request for peazip-beta-gtk2 [1], peazip-beta-qt [2], and peazip-portable-gtk1 [3]. All three packages are horribly out of date; [1] and [2] are at version 3.x, [3] is at version 2.x, while peazip-gtk2 [4] and peazip-qt [5] are at 4.7.2. Also, they provide no difference from the more current respective packages; [1] and [2] are essentially duplicates, and [3] is more than obsolete, especially with the gtk1 interface, and being 4 years and 2 whole versions behind. The maintainer, tuxspirit, has been known to be inactive. Please delete [1], [2], and [3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29917 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29915 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14225 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43957 [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43956

2 1

[aur-general] prune_dev_bin deletion request
by Jozef Riha 20 Sep '12

20 Sep '12

please, delete prune_dev_bin (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43862) from aur (i am the author of pkgbuild). there's a new version that replaces it (due to a new name in upstream): http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62975 thank you, jose

2 1

[aur-general] No confirmation link received
by Sandro Munda 20 Sep '12

20 Sep '12

Hello, I would like to register myself to AUR. The problem is that when I click on "Forgot your password" : > Check your e-mail for the confirmation link. Great. But I don't receive the mail. :'( Sandro Munda <munda.sandro(a)gmail.com>

6 15

[aur-general] Removal request - eclim-juno-git
by Alexandre Fonseca 20 Sep '12

20 Sep '12

Hello, Could someone please remove the eclim-juno-git package from AUR? It was created at a time when the main eclim project was only compatible with the previous eclipse versions and had a branch for the juno eclipse versions. As the branch was merged into master, eclim-juno-git is now just a copy of the original eclim-git. Appreciated! Alexandre Fonseca

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Bogdan Ionuț 20 Sep '12

20 Sep '12

Please remove the following packages: conky-cli-old[1] - this is no longer needed, the oss emulation works ok on newer version. milky-icon-theme[2] - the tarball is nowhere to be found. nvidia-bfs-beta[3] - I don't have the time to maintain this also. plasma-theme-produkt[4] - is now part of kdeartwork-desktopthemes. virtualbox-bfs-modules[5] - I replaced this with virtualbox-modules-bfs. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48691 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28549 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47193 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38639 [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53770

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Sep '12

20 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120915-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 5 signoffs 2. bisson - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package removal
by Xavier Devlamynck 20 Sep '12

20 Sep '12

Could you remove dbus-c++ (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17985) as it has been reintegrated in [extra]

2 1

[aur-general] Package deletion request - i3-pango
by Patrice Peterson 20 Sep '12

20 Sep '12

Hey, Please delete my package i3-pango [1]. I3 officially supports Pango since version 4.3, making this package obsolete. Thanks, Patrice [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59344

2 1

[aur-general] dropping my *-bede *-besrv from aur
by Ike Devolder 19 Sep '12

19 Sep '12

Hi all, just to notify i'll drop some of my own packages from aur. i'll drop: linux-bede: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50914 lirc-bede: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53461 nvidia-bede: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44338 linux-besrv: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51144 these packages did not really bring any additional benefit to the community and only bring more confusion. so i'll drop them. -- Ike

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request
by Vinycius Maia 19 Sep '12

19 Sep '12

Please, disown mcobj [1] and mcobj-git [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49697 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49765 Thanks

3 4

[aur-general] Delete Request
by Alfredo Palhares 19 Sep '12

19 Sep '12

Please delete[1] i typo'd the pkgname [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62926 -- Regards, Alfredo Palhares

2 2

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Felix Yan 19 Sep '12

19 Sep '12

Hi, I found the package openvpn-dev already provides all functionality that my package openvpn-ipv6 [1] provides, so there is no aim to provide an old beta package. Please help me remove it [1], thanks! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60170 Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Sep '12

19 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120915-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 7 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request: quad, balz
by Limao Luo 19 Sep '12

19 Sep '12

Quad [1] and balz [2] don't build properly (because they use $startdir/src and $startdir/pkg instead of $srcdir and $pkgdir. tuxspirit is, AFAIK, inactive, and hasn't updated their packages in the past. Would appreciate a disown, especially since a couple of my packages (peazip-gtk2 [3], peazip-qt [4]) depend on [1] and [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14145 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18352 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43957 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43956

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: riak-systemd-unit
by Gianni Vialetto 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

My package riak-systemd-unit [1] is now useless, since the service unit is already included in the latest riak AUR package [2]. Please remove it from the AUR. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62061 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35433 -- Gianni Vialetto "To see things in the seed, that is genius." - Lao Tzu

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: systemd-granola
by Limao Luo 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

All the scripts from my package systemd-granola [1] have been added into granola-connect [2] and granola [3]. Please delete [1] as it now serves no purpose. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52808 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51670 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36841

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by der_FeniX 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

Please, merge [1] into [2] because of original app renaming [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37635 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62896

2 1

[aur-general] Please remove my AUR account
by Tomasz Niedzielski 18 Sep '12

18 Sep '12

Due to a cheeky comment (in my opinion) under one of my packages, I decided to resign from creating and developping any packages for public use. The best would be if you could completely remove my account and all packages created by me - those of them, which I adopted, will be orphaned (after removing my data from PKGBUILDS). Thank you.

8 12