- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Merge Request
by Maxime Gauduin 28 Aug '12

28 Aug '12

Hi guys, Aegisub is moving from svn to git, could you merge aegisub-svn into aegisub-git? aegisub-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10919 aegisub-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62332 Thx in advance! -- Alucryd "In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into eternal damnation. Amen."

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Aug '12

28 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 14 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (14 total) == * cdfs-2.6.27-27 (i686) * ndiswrapper-1.57-19 (i686) * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-7 (i686) * r8168-8.032.00-1 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-13 (i686) * vhba-module-20120422-8 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-3 (i686) * cdfs-2.6.27-27 (x86_64) * ndiswrapper-1.57-19 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-7 (x86_64) * r8168-8.032.00-1 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-13 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20120422-8 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * cdfs-2.6.27-27 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-19 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.032.00-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-27 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-19 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.032.00-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. idevolder - 3 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. stephane - 2 signoffs 4. lcarlier - 2 signoffs 5. ibiru - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package merge request: mayavi-doc and python2-mayavi-doc
by Felix Yan 27 Aug '12

27 Aug '12

This is following a rename by giniu ( aur/python2-mayavi => community/mayavi ) Please help me merge package python2-mayavi-doc [1] into mayavi-doc [2] , thanks! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46181 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62326 Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at

2 1

[aur-general] Looking for a sponsor
by Felix Yan 27 Aug '12

27 Aug '12

Hi all, I'm interested in becoming a TU. I used Arch only for one year and a half but 4 for Linux (Ubuntu before). I submitted my first package by the end of last year, and maintain more and more during the last a few months. I am eager to maintain packages that loved and needed by Chinese users as I am one too, such as input methods(fcitx-*, ibus-*, sunpinyin, libpinyin, etc), internet supplicant in Chinese universities(mentohust/ruijieclient), chat tools qq related(linuxqq, webqq, libqq*, etc) and popular proxy tools (sshuttle, goagent, etc). And I am also a python programmer and maintaining more than 20 python libraries I use for now. I am also active in reporting and following issues upstream, such as pidgin-lwqq [1]. As I looked after more and more packages on AUR I found many users not so convenient to install so many packages in AUR, so I joined archlinuxcn's community repository project [2] to provide popular packages in binary. But this is not good for user to involve in (such as flag out-of-date, report bugs, etc). I am also an IT manager in work, and maintaining several Arch servers. Some more info about me: 21, male, Wuhan in China, working in a startup, not very good at C and English. My AUR packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=felixonmars And my stackoverflow careers if interested: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/felixonmars [1] https://github.com/xiehuc/pidgin-lwqq/issues?page=1&state=closed (Chinese) [2] https://bbs.archlinuxcn.org/viewtopic.php?id=798 (Chinese) Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at

1 0

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Felix Yan 27 Aug '12

27 Aug '12

systemd-goagent-units [1] has been merged into goagent [2] a month ago and not needed by any package now. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56743 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59593 Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Aug '12

27 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686), since 2012-08-09 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64), since 2012-08-09 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 4 signoffs 2. lcarlier - 4 signoffs 3. tpowa - 4 signoffs 4. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Schala Zeal 27 Aug '12

27 Aug '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58510 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58486 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61472 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61473 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58485 All of these are Flash games I previously packaged that are better suited to be played through a web browser. I guess I went a bit nutty with my package making.

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Aug '12

26 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686), since 2012-08-09 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64), since 2012-08-09 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 5 signoffs 2. thomas - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] delete request
by Dirk 25 Aug '12

25 Aug '12

[1] & [2] are orphaned and they don't build because the linked files are not available anymore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23863 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41352 Dirk

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: cb2bib
by Egon Geerardyn 25 Aug '12

25 Aug '12

Please disown cb2bib [1]. It has been outdated since May. I contacted the maintainer (tdy) at the end of July, but I never got a response or an out of office. At the same time, I also linked to an updated PKGBUILD on AUR, but it hasn't been integrated. Thanks! Egon Geerardyn [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21447<%20https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21447>cb2bib AUR page

2 1

[aur-general] Package update help
by der_FeniX 25 Aug '12

25 Aug '12

Hello! I take an orhpaned package [1] and update it. Original binary name is odeskteam-qt4. AUR package is named as godesk. And now I don't understand - leave name as is or need to rename it. I don't know why it was named as godesk, may be because early it was written on gtk, but now is on qt4 or there is another reason. Anycase I need help now with the definition of package's name. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37635 -- Le Roi Est Mort! Vive Le Roi!

2 3

[aur-general] merge request
by Dirk 25 Aug '12

25 Aug '12

There is a duplicate package for {systemd-}xorg-launch-helper [1]&[2]. I don't know which one is better or what name is preferred, but I guess they should be merged. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60347 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62064 Dirk

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Aug '12

25 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (23 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.7.1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686), since 2012-08-09 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64), since 2012-08-09 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: systemd-mongodb-units
by Benjamin A. Shelton 25 Aug '12

25 Aug '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Please remove my package systemd-mongodb-units[1]. It is now provided with MongoDB from the community repository and is no longer needed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61297 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlA39zQACgkQX0wjpDDqKTAsGwD+MjMVYWzLNo3b/IKA7307A4OG rC7CmGxIQ2fpy492HScBAKNVKStT+tcXuMJTijuAhlSYDCQp+334XOboQ0weZrDF =e3iR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2

[aur-general] Removal request : chrome-pepper-flashplugin
by raeonz 24 Aug '12

24 Aug '12

I am maintainer of this package and since it is packaged with the stable version of google-chrome you can now delete it from aur. Thanks. link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58861

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Aug '12

24 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (23 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.7.1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686), since 2012-08-09 * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64), since 2012-08-09 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: vba-m-gtk
by alexander.r＠gmx.com 24 Aug '12

24 Aug '12

Please remove vba-m-gtk [1], vba-m [2] already has GTK support. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56355 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55248 -- My AUR packages - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=AlexanderR

2 1

[aur-general] [Delete request] octave-gui-hg
by Stefan Husmann 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

Hello, octave-gui-hg [1] is not needed anymore, because the gui version now has become the default in octave-hg [2], also providing octave-cli. The former mantainer agreed in the AUR comments. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58889 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30572 Best Regards Stefan

2 1

[aur-general] Please delete my package maya2013sp1
by Flaminigo 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

Hi, Something messed up in the PKGBUILD file and the application's icon won't show up correctly. I don't know I cannot delete the package after submitting it. Otherwise, I will check it carefully. Sorry for that. I am a newbie. Thanks. -Sunny

3 4

[aur-general] revised PKGBUILD for dupeguru-me & two questions
by Rob Til Freedmen 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

Hi, now that I've read what I should have done before posting ;) I've still some questions: 1) The package changed the license to 'BSD Revised' - is it any different to 'BSD'? 2) The package contains also a qtlib license - do I have to add it also? 3) With a BSD license, is it ok to disable the nag screen shown on every start? There is still the registration/contribute menu in <help> for support of the author. Any comments welcome. rtf --x--x--x--x-- # Maintainer: rtfreedman (rob<d0t>til<d0t>freedman<aT>googlemail<d0t>com # Contributor: Dan Serban, SiD pkgname=dupeguru-me-bin pkgver=6.5.0 pkgrel=2 pkgdesc="Find duplicate songs in your music collection" arch=(any) url=http://www.hardcoded.net/dupeguru_me/ license=('BSD') depends=(python pyqt sip) source=(https://launchpadlibrarian.net/112416309/dupeguru-me_${pkgver}_all.… md5sums=('1b143883a44c99965b0acea9c5c23a48') build() { return 0 } package() { cd "${srcdir}" bsdtar -xf dupeguru-me_${pkgver}_all.deb data.tar.gz bsdtar -xf data.tar.gz # nonag sed -i 's/self.model.initial_registration_setup()/# self.model.initial_registration_setup()/g' \ usr/share/dupeguru_me/qt/base/app.py mkdir -p "${pkgdir}"/usr/bin mv usr/bin/dupeguru_me "${pkgdir}"/usr/bin mv usr/share "${pkgdir}"/usr/ install -Dm644 "${pkgdir}"/usr/share/dupeguru_me/hscommon/LICENSE \ "${pkgdir}"/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/LICENSE } --x--x--x--x--

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 27 packages missing signoffs * 13 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (25 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.7.1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120704-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * drbd-8.3.13-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (13 total) == * slmodem-2.9.11-67 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-6 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (i686), since 2012-07-30 * cdfs-2.6.27-26 (x86_64), since 2012-07-30 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * ndiswrapper-1.57-18 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (x86_64), since 2012-07-31 * tp_smapi-0.41-5 (i686), since 2012-07-31 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * r8168-8.031.00-9 (i686), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (x86_64), since 2012-08-02 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-12 (i686), since 2012-08-02 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 6 signoffs 2. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Please merge aafm and aafm-git
by Cyker Way 23 Aug '12

23 Aug '12

Hello, Since aafm is actually using the upstream git repo, I've renamed it to another package called aafm-git. Please merge these two packages under the same name *aafm-git*. Thank you! -- Cyker

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Nuno Araujo 22 Aug '12

22 Aug '12

Hello Me again, sorry... Could you remove the following packages? gnome15-gnome-plugins (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47363) gnome15-panel-applet (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47362) gnome15-systemtray (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47361) Those packages are obsolete (gnome15-panel-applet) or were integrated into existing packages (gnome15-gnome-plugins and gnome15-systemtray). You can check AUR comments for more information. Thank you once again! -- Nuno Araujo <nuno.araujo(a)russo79.com>

2 3

[aur-general] Package removal request: x264-jeeb-git
by Felix Yan 22 Aug '12

22 Aug '12

Hi, I'd like to ask for removal, this package was my orphaned package by the end of last year and renamed to x264-jeeb after then, as upstream only releases patches in major versions and often breaks -git building. Thanks! Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars Wiki: http://felixc.at

2 1

[aur-general] Please remove package
by Tomasz Niedzielski 22 Aug '12

22 Aug '12

Hello. Accidentaly I sent wrong package on AUR plasma-surtime [1]. Please, be so kind and remove it. Thank you. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62208

2 1