- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Jul '12

24 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 18 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (18 total) == * cdfs-2.6.27-25 (i686) * ndiswrapper-1.57-17 (i686) * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-5 (i686) * pingus-0.7.6-5 (i686) * r8168-8.031.00-5 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-11 (i686) * sage-mathematics-5.1-3 (i686) * vhba-module-20120422-5 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-5 (i686) * cdfs-2.6.27-25 (x86_64) * ndiswrapper-1.57-17 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-5 (x86_64) * pingus-0.7.6-5 (x86_64) * r8168-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-11 (x86_64) * sage-mathematics-5.1-3 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20120422-5 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * cdfs-2.6.27-25 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-17 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-11 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * sage-mathematics-5.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sage-mathematics-5.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 6 signoffs 2. bisson - 3 signoffs 3. tomegun - 2 signoffs 4. stephane - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion requests
by Lex Black 24 Jul '12

24 Jul '12

Hello Again some packages that can be deleted, so I assume. Let's start: (All are orphaned and outdated, or owned by me) # shoes: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15462 URLs are dead # shoutcast-search: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25366 Not working since 2010/11. Upstream devel on halt and I don't think shoutcast will revert the api. # silverlight-media-pack: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36181 Sourcelink dead # sim-im: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3470 Upstream development ceased since 2008. I tried to update the pkgbuild to the latest version but building the package failed. # simple-scan-devel: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51891 Devel version that's older than stable. # sip-py-dev: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21150 Same as above # sip-py3-dev: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24908 Same as above # slat: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13678 Doesn't build # slate: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6945 Out of date. All devel is done via git now, and stable snapshots aren't available (Just old ones) # smarbs: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26558 Doesn't build, out of date # snesreader: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30491 Sourcelink dead and most likely deprecated (Cannot find any source on the devel-page) # sonata-disautocenter: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19242 Ood and the patch doesn't work with the latest version. (Tried to adapt it.. ) # haskell-xml-enumerator: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48924 Deprecated and can be removed # haskell-attoparsec-text-enumerator: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48920 Deprecated and can be removed # haskell-attoparsec-text: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46245 Deprecated and can be removed. # haskell-deepseq: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57024 Not sure.. But it's out of date, not a legacy version and got included in ghc (newest version) # specimen-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22765 SVN repo doesn't exist anymore # skype-dynamic: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59264 Not sure about that. If m039 would maintain it I wouldn't say anything. But he dropped it and he mentioned a better version # pidgin-disco: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26841 Out of date, last update in 2009. And in recent versions there is a disco plugin included # tpu: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22755 Just looked at the comment and didn't test it by myself #tor-rc: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15368 Really old # truecrypt-zen: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13908 Really old and for linux 2.6.* # xulrunner-1.8: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18076 Source dead # wpa_supplicant-beta: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17370 Out of date and currently no beta # transmission-svn-seba14: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36991 Some comments suggests it should be deleted. And propably it won't build, ood # transmission-ng https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45793 Not sure about that. For a transmission package it's really old # transmission-beta-gtk: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47916 Old transmission beta # transmission-beta: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48387 Another one # seamonkey-beta-bin: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42155 Old beta # pidgin-msngroup: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20418 Out of date and most likely not necessary anymore Best regards, Lex

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: xelatex-stuff
by Tasos Latsas 23 Jul '12

23 Jul '12

Hello, Please remove xelatex-stuff [1], the installed files are included in texlive-latexextra not to mention the PKGBUILD state. Thanks [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45544 -- Tasos Latsas GPG key: 0x414301DF http://coderwall.com/tlatsas

2 2

[aur-general] Delete request : httpie
by Vincent Berset 23 Jul '12

23 Jul '12

Hi, Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60985 It's a duplicate of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60984 Thanks. Regards, Vincent

2 1

[aur-general] Package deletion request
by mitsuset＠gmail.com 23 Jul '12

23 Jul '12

Please delete python-wtforms[1] because it was replaced with python2-wtforms. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26120 Thanks. -- Tomoya Kose (mitsuse) mitsuset(a)gmail.com

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Jul '12

23 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * mailman-2.1.15-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 5 signoffs 2. tomegun - 5 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 4. dreisner - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] merge dwarves into pahole
by ohav chochmah 22 Jul '12

22 Jul '12

Hello, dwarves [0] is orphan, links are outdated, and name is incorrect. Please merge into pahole [1], which is the corrected version. Thanks. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24639 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61124

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan Request: xen
by Luceo Astrum 22 Jul '12

22 Jul '12

Hi, I'd like to request that xen be orphaned so that I can adopt it: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14640 I've contacted the maintainer (revellion) by e-mail yesterday (I know nowhere near the two weeks but believe the rest of this post is relevant). Since the last update in 2011, there have been three serious Xen Security Advisories with patches: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-announce/2012-06/msg00001.html http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-announce/2012-06/msg00003.html http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-announce/2012-06/msg00002.html The maintainer has not upgraded the package to support these patches. He also hasn't changed the dependency for 'xz-utils' to 'xz'. The package was marked out of date. Finally, he has not responded on the AUR comments, including two addressed directly to him by 'aaronfitz' and 'fatmike' in January and March respectively. All of the above leads me to believe that he's no longer active. I will update this thread after 2 weeks if he hasn't responded, unless a TU takes the decision that my research is enough to show that the user is not active.

2 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Jul '12

22 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * libtorrent-0.13.2-2 (i686) * rtorrent-0.9.2-2 (i686) * libtorrent-0.13.2-2 (x86_64) * rtorrent-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * libtorrent-0.13.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rtorrent-0.9.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libtorrent-0.13.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rtorrent-0.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 14 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 2 signoffs 3. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] A question about building qgis
by Myra Nelson 22 Jul '12

22 Jul '12

The qgis-trunk package build to this point Scanning dependencies of target synccrsdb ../../output/bin/crssync: error while loading shared libraries: libqgis_core.so.1.9.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory make[2]: *** [src/crssync/CMakeFiles/synccrsdb] Error 127 make[1]: *** [src/crssync/CMakeFiles/synccrsdb.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 In searching for a solution I found a this solution [ error while loading shared libraries: libqgis_core.so.1.8.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory If you have this error while loading a compiled qgis, you can try this: # get the full lib path, for example "/home/myusername/src/qgis/Quantum-GIS/build/lib/" (no wildcard ~) # copy this path to a new file /etc/ld.so.conf.d/qgis.conf (on Ubuntu distribution. This can change a bit) sudo su echo "/home/myusername/src/qgis/Quantum-GIS/build/lib/" > /etc/ld.so.conf.d/qgis.conf exit # ldconfig sudo ldconfig # verify with ldd ldd /home/myusername/src/qgis/Quantum-GIS/build/bin/qgis | grep "libqgis" ] here -> http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Building_QGIS_from_Source This is one of my weaker areas. Is this the correct solution or is there a better way to do this? I really don't want to f'up my box after successfully negotiating the latest upgrades. Thanks for any assistance. Mya -- Life's fun when your sick and psychotic!

2 2

[aur-general] Merge request
by Dan Vratil 21 Jul '12

21 Jul '12

Hi, please merge following packages. I updated them to conform the KDE package policy. google-translate-runner [0] => kdeplasma-runners-google-translate [1] plasma-idos-search [2] => kdeplasma-applets-idos-search [3]. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26685 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61075 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33299 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61074 Thanks Dan -- Dan Vratil www.progdan.cz | dan(a)progdan.cz | Jabber: progdan(a)jabber.cz Fingerprint: 76C9 2F08 5D0D 6F9E 5AD4 2BFD 3A85 0307 F506 5B61

2 1

[aur-general] disown request: esniper
by Bjoern Franke 21 Jul '12

21 Jul '12

Hello, I would like to adopt esniper[1], it has been marked out of date since 16.02.2012. Regards Bjoern [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5782 -- xmpp: bjo(a)schafweide.org bjo.nord-west.org | nord-west.org | freifunk-ol.de

4 7

[aur-general] AUR and unsuported architectures
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 21 Jul '12

21 Jul '12

Hi, I've recently seen some comments in AUR, where a user points out that X package works well on powerpc/arm. I was wondering what's the general approach given to these architectures on AUR; since AUR is unsupported, is it ok to add these architectures to the PKGBUILD's arch array? If it is ok, is it *advised* to do so when apropriate? Supported architectures should see absolutely no change regarding these packages, and unsupported one will benefit from it. Again, being AUR unsupported anyway, I see nothing bad out of this, but I'd like to know the TU's stance on this, especially since I'm about to install archlinuxppc on one of my laptops. :) Cheers, thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

13 20

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Jul '12

21 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-4 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * mailman-2.1.15-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 9 signoffs 2. allan - 8 signoffs 3. tomegun - 8 signoffs 4. eric - 4 signoffs 5. idevolder - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package Rename/Merge Request (pythondialog)
by bwr sandman 21 Jul '12

21 Jul '12

Hello! I am requesting that the out of date pythondialog package[1] be merged into the new python2-dialog[2]. I contacted the maintainer and he orphaned it[1], so I adopted it. I updated the nomenclature and explicitly use python2. I also made it conform more to the python packaging guidelines in the new package[2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2165 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61061 Thank you! -- bwrsandman

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Jul '12

20 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * mailman-2.1.15-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Merge packages request
by Aliaksandr Stelmachonak 20 Jul '12

20 Jul '12

Hi, After creation new packages with names according to KDE guidelines, old packages need to be merged with new one. Can you please help: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36886 (old) should be merged with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60969 (new) and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56187 (old) should be merged with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60970 (new) Thanks, Alex

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: kimagemapeditor
by Jekyll Wu 20 Jul '12

20 Jul '12

That package[1] is for KDE3 and orphaned (the PKGBUILD is problematic). The KDE4 version is part of KDE SC. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6991

2 1

[aur-general] Remove some emane packages
by Tom Wambold 19 Jul '12

19 Jul '12

Hello TUs: I just updated the emane package [1] to include all the many modules in one package (most users will want most of the modules, and they are pretty small). So, the separate packages are no longer needed. Can you please delete the following packages: * libemaneeventservice [2] * python2-emaneeventlocation [3] * python2-emaneeventservice [4] Thanks! -Tom Wambold [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4225 [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56242 [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56243 [4]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56244

2 4

[aur-general] Deletion Request: eclim-git-juno
by Alexandre Fonseca 19 Jul '12

19 Jul '12

Hello! Could someone please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61012 (eclim-git-juno)? I initially submitted it but then noticed that it didn't adhere to the naming convention of having the -git as the last part of the name and thus reuploaded it to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61013 (eclim-juno-git). Had I known before hand I couldn't delete submitted packages, I'd have taken greater care. Sorry for the inconvenience! Best regards, Revolt aka Alexandre Fonseca

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request for abookells
by Markus Unterwaditzer 19 Jul '12

19 Jul '12

Could somebody delete abokells https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50006 It's out-of-date since 3rd January, upstream's dead and there are already abook packages with vcard patches available. -- Markus

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request for kde-servicemenus-pdfktools
by Sylvain Vidal 19 Jul '12

19 Jul '12

Hello, Following the request to conform to the KDE naming conventions on AUR, could you merge pdfktools-servicemenu-kde4 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45464 into kde-servicemenus-pdfktools https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60977 ? Thanks, Regards, Sylvain -- Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org GPG key: 1EC3B74E ------------------------------ Merci d'éviter de m'envoyer des fichiers Word, Excel ou PowerPoint. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.fr.html

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by TingPing 19 Jul '12

19 Jul '12

Op dinsdag 17 juli 2012 14:01:12 schreef TingPing: >* hexchat-sasl should be removed, it was added upstream* Could you add the links please thx --Ike https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60926 https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/commit/e5f4c4d217a35f5405dc1f2a6ff9f79e2…

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Jul '12

19 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * mailman-2.1.15-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.15-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andrea - 2 signoffs 2. tpowa - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request for servicemenu-pdf-kde4
by Krzysztof Raczkowski 18 Jul '12

18 Jul '12

Hi, I'd like to ask for merging: servicemenu-pdf-kde4 [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24898] with: kde-servicemenus-pdf [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60976] in regard of the new KDE package guidelines. Cheers, -- Krzysztof Raczkowski raczkow(a)gmail.com

2 1