- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Removal request: fenics group packages
by Myles English 18 May '12

18 May '12

Hi, I was maintaining these packages: dolfin ffc fiat instant ufc ufl viper Please would a TU delete them and transfer the votes to the *-bzr versions that I have replaced them with. I orphaned the packages over a week ago and gave one week's notice in a comment on each page that they would be removed. I also announced the removal/migration on the dolfin mailing list. (The instant package migrated to instan-bzr because the source package name was too long to call it instant-bzr.) Thanks, Myles

3 2

[aur-general] Disown request: tal-plugins
by Frankie Robertson 18 May '12

18 May '12

Hi, The package [tal-plugins](https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44426) is out of date and doesn't build at the moment. Unfortunately I couldn't contact the maintainer since they haven't provided a valid email address. If it's disowned I can update it with a working package. Thanks, Frankie

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 May '12

18 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64), since 2012-04-26 * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686), since 2012-04-26 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 2 signoffs 2. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Notice: Disowning all my mingw32-* packages
by Schala Zeal 18 May '12

18 May '12

I've decided to drop maintenance for every mingw32-* package I owned on AUR to focus on mingw-w64-* instead. Please feel free to adopt any of the mass-orphaned packages.

1 0

[aur-general] Merge telepathy-qt4-git into telepathy-qt-git
by George Brooke 17 May '12

17 May '12

Hi, Please merge telepathy-qt4-git [1] into telepathy-qt-git [2] which is in line with the naming of the official telepathy-qt package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36235 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59340 Thanks GeorgeB

3 2

[aur-general] Remove fontforge-double
by Bernardo Barros 17 May '12

17 May '12

fontforge-double https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55633 Originaly fix to a LilyPond bug. This is not needed anymore since they fix the problem in extra/fontconfig and probably they rebuild lilypond. I forgot to request it before. Thanks -- Bernardo Barros

2 1

[aur-general] (no subject)
by Jagmjp Janpgm 17 May '12

17 May '12

Make Money? Super EASY <a href="http://fotikucko.p8.hu/breakingnews/83StephenBrown/">http://fotikucko.p8.hu/breakingnews/83StephenBrown/</a>

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 May '12

17 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 5 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * libvirt-0.9.12-2 (i686) * libvirt-0.9.12-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.12-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.12-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64), since 2012-04-26 * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686), since 2012-04-26 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 2. bisson - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] [aur-dev] Drop packages
by Ike Devolder 16 May '12

16 May '12

Op woensdag 16 mei 2012 18:29:16 schreef Petronio Padilha: > Hello there!! > > On the 15th and 16th May I did upload three packages: archscript, > archsysinfo, and finally archsysinfo-git (the ok-version!). > > So,let's start from the beginning... > > First... i did upload my source named: *archscript*. After I upload, > someone told me I could not leave the package without "-git" in its name > and that there is also a script called archscript. So I decided to change > the package name, but I made a mistake again... > I identified a little problem with PKGBUILD and with the git code. > So finally I uploaded the final version archsysinfo-git. > > I would like to stay with *archsysinfo-git *and remove *archscript *and * > archsysinfo* > > Sorry for the confusion. Deleted the wrong ones for aur packages please send your mails to aur-general mailinglist and not to aur-dev and could you also provide links to the packages in the future thx --Ike

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 May '12

16 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64), since 2012-04-26 * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686), since 2012-04-26 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 1 signoffs 2. ibiru - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] (no subject)
by Jagmjp Janpgm 15 May '12

15 May '12

Make a lot of money working from home <a href="http://facemash.fa.funpic.de/lastnews/16AndrewCooper/">http://facemash.fa.funpic.de/lastnews/16AndrewCooper/</a>

3 2

[aur-general] Deletion request: libsbml42-layout-render
by Michael Schubert 15 May '12

15 May '12

Hello, please delete libsbml42-layout-render [1], as the extension has become available for libSBML 5 (I am the maintainer). Thanks Michael [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53163

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 May '12

15 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64), since 2012-04-26 * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686), since 2012-04-26 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 5 signoffs 2. eric - 4 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Catalyst/Nvidia cleanup
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 15 May '12

15 May '12

#Please remove the following out-of-date/old versions of catalyst #packages. None of them probably builds with the current stock kernels, #and mostlikely need really old version of X.org [1]catalyst-beta [2]catalyst-ice [3]catalyst-leaked [4]catalyst-old [5]catalyst-switch [6]catalyst-tp [7]catalyst-utils-old --------------------------------------------------------------------- [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31216 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15482 [3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28842 [4]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25105 [5]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48208 [6]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16406 [7]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25106 ===================================================================== #The following nvdia binary blob releated packages should be removed. #Reasons include orphan, out-of-date, old (beta/testing) versions, which #do not work with our current kernels, X.org or need some older gcc #release. [10]cuda-beta [11]cuda-sdk-beta [12]cuda-toolkit-beta [13]cuda-old [14]cuda-sdk-old [15]cuda-toolkit-old ##If needed the -old packages should be reuploaded as cuda2-X like done ##with most other applications and as with the verison 3 branch of #cuda(cuda3-X) [16]cuda-sdk-gcc34 #Do we really need a version for gcc34? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [10]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48012 [11]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47707 [12]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47706 [13]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30504 [14]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30506 [15]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30505 [16]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26331 ===================================================================== [20]nvidia-96xx-fbcondecor [21]nvidia-96xx-ice [22]nvidia-96xx-zen #No maintainer and depend on the old kernel26 naming scheme, #nvidia-96xx-all can build a package for any installed kernel. Merging #to nvidia-96xx-all, instead of removal, might be the way to go. [23]lib32-nvidia-utils-96xx --------------------------------------------------------------------- [20]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25475 [21]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15440 [22]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13901 [23]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32046 ===================================================================== [30]nvidia-173xx-ck [31]nvidia-173xx-fbcondecor [32]nvidia-173xx-ice [33]nvidia-173xx-lqx [34]nvidia-173xx-lts #Merge into [35]nvidia-173xx-all, same reason as with the 96xx branch. #nvidia-173xx-all, is out-of-date but maintained unlike the others. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [30]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44381 [31]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31986 [32]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21059 [33]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46877 [34]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46112 [35]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32909 ===================================================================== [40]nvidia-256 [41]nvidia-ck-256 [42]nvidia-utils-256 [43]lib32-nvidia-utils-256 #If I undertood correctly from my googling, this is not an major version #branch, which dropped support for old hw. At the moment of writing #binary repo nvidia, has all of the same functionality + more -------------------------------------------------------------------- [40]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42037 [41]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43968 [42]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42038 [43]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43969 ===================================================================== [50]nvidia-275xx [51]nvidia-275xx-ck [52]nvidia-utils-275xx [53]lib32-nvidia-utils-275xx [54]opencl-nvidia-275xx #If I understood correctly my googling, this is older version of the one #in binary repos (at the moment of writing), with the exeption of this #being for X.org server 1.11. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [50]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52283 [51]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55013 [52]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52285 [53]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52284 [54]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52286 ===================================================================== [60]nforce-nvsound [61]nforce-nvsound-utils #Some really old OSS sound driver for nForce 1/2 motherboards, support #for them exist in kernel tree, accoeding to comments. [62]nvidia-builder #Out-of-date, non maintained, we can easily manage without it too. Easy #to remake if ever needed [63]rivatv-cvs #Old kernel triver, last commit 4 years ago, I'd be suprised if it would #build with modern kernel, without 5000 lines of patches ^_^ --------------------------------------------------------------------- [60]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6922 [61]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6923 [62]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31604 [63]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9500 ===================================================================== [70]nvidia-beta-zen: badly out-of-date, no maintainer [71]nvidia-ice-beta: -||- [72]nvidia-tp: -||- [73]nvidia-utils-glselect: -||- [74]nvidia-utils-ice: -||- [75]nvidia-utils-pselec: -||- [76]nvidia-utils-sane: -||- [77]nvidia-vs: -||- [78]nvidia-xen #out-of-date, no maintainer, does not build for xen kernel, but instead #the one which one booted in. `uname -r` [79]nvidia-yi: badly out-of-date, no maintainer. [80]nvidia-zen-stable --------------------------------------------------------------------- [70]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13904 [71]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20410 [72]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14974 [73]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35814 [74]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50024 [75]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35824 [76]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29617 [77]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45327 [78]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13093 [79]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37948 [80]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30154

2 1

[aur-general] remove package
by Tai-Lin Chu 15 May '12

15 May '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57916 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56186 Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] removal request
by Guardiano 14 May '12

14 May '12

Hello, i uploaded PKGBUILD with wrong name, please delete this. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59283 Thanks! Guardiano

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Multilib package [skype] marked out-of-date
by Florian Pritz 14 May '12

14 May '12

On 14.05.2012 15:22, Arch Website Notification wrote: > **** wants to notify you that the following packages may be out-of-date: > > > * skype 2.2.0.35-3 [community] (i686): https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/skype/ > * skype 2.2.0.35-3 [multilib] (x86_64): https://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/skype/ > > > The user provided the following additional text: > > New Version available http://blogs.skype.com/garage/2012/05/skype_22_for_linux_hotfix.html > > http://download.skype.com/linux/skype_static-2.2.0.99.tar.bz2 > > Maybe 2.2.0.35-3 is not affected, but even then, its not the latest version. Please update :-)! We are packaging the dynamically linked skype binary and if you read that blog post skype even states that you don't need to update that because .35 is the latest dynamically linked skype package. The problem that has been fix in the static build is in libpng which we package separately and that has already been updated, therefore our skype package is fine. Since this is the second time, I ask everyone not to flag skype out of date again unless they really release a new dynamically linked package. Thank you. PS: The submitter of this OOD message has been BCC'ed. -- Florian Pritz

1 0

[aur-general] [uTorrent-server] need help with PKGBUILD!
by Pierre-Antoine Vanpe 14 May '12

14 May '12

Hi all, I own the uTorrent-serveur package [1] lots of people asked me to run the utserver deamon as utserver instead of root, so I tried my best with another member, but we can't get it to work right. It works but only after installing it, after a reboot it won't work without any errors. Only way to make it work again is re-installing. Can anyone help me with this PKGBUILD? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43253 BTW, there are a few duplicates PKGBUILDs for utorrent-server....

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 May '12

14 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64), since 2012-04-26 * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686), since 2012-04-26 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 6 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 3 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 4. ibiru - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request
by Schala Zeal 13 May '12

13 May '12

Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59092 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59237 I decided to drop the -hg suffix since there's no actual releases outside of the hg repo. If that ever does happen, I'll remake the package.

3 2

[aur-general] Remove i3lock-libcairo
by Robert Knauer 13 May '12

13 May '12

Hi, the community/i3lock package is since version 2.4-2 compiled with image support, so my package i3lock-libcairo [1] isn't necessary anymore and you can delete it. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50985

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 May '12

13 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64), since 2012-04-26 * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686), since 2012-04-26 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 3 signoffs 2. dan - 2 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] bin32 cleanup (removal/merge)
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 12 May '12

12 May '12

Here are some old bin32 packages that should be merged into their non-bin32 counterpart as support for x86_64 has been added to the PKGBUILD. 'a->b'=merge a to b [1]bin32-acroread-fr -> [2]acroread-fr [3]bin32-adobe-air -> [4]adobe-air-sdk [5]bin32-citrix-client -> [6]citrix-client [7]bin32-emusic-dlm -> [8]emusic-dlm [9]bin32-fcc -> [10]fcc [11]bin32-huludesktop -> [12]huludesktop [13]bin32-miniaudicle -> [14]miniaudicle [15]bin32-peazip-qt-kde4servicemenu -> [16]peazip-qt [17]bin32-vmware-server-console -> [18]vmware-server-console [19]bin32-wingide -> [20]wingide [21]bin32-xnview -> [22]xnview --------------------------------------------------------------------- [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15449 [2}https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11972 [3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23330 [4]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25633 [5]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36849 [6]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24705 [7]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32239 [8]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13897 [9]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19362 [10]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18614 [11]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35799 [12]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31063 [13]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35283 [14]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34472 [15]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50035 [16]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43956 [17]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31169 [18]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9604 [19]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23385 [20]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17874 [21]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30078 [22]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=861 ===================================================================== These ones should be removed [1]bin32-fennec: No new linux binaries awaiable, orphan only 4 votes, no fennec package. Ment for tables/mobilephones [2]bin32-flashplayer-debugger: Old debugging version of flash, no non-bin32 package exist, orphan, only 2 votes. [3]bin32-liveperson: Java application, message sent for the i686 version maintainer to fix his PKGBUILD to be arch=(any), no votes/comments to merge [4]bin32-neroaac: See below. [5]neroaac: Replaced by neroaac{enc,dec,tag} packaes which all have x86_64 support too. [6]bin32-sonic-visualizer: See below [7]sonic-visualizer32: normal package supports x86_64 natively, out-of-date, orphan, only 2 votes. [8]bin32-swiftweasel-athlon64: Really old version Firefox 3 branch, few users, orphan. And to my knoweledge repo Firefox is PGO optimized now days. [9]bin32-tuxsetup: Website down, orphan, only 2 votes. [10]bin32-tuxdroid-ttsvoice-french: website down, orphan, only 1 vote. [11]bin32-vfc: Website down, orphan, only 2 votes --------------------------------------------------------------------- [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49373 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37138 [3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57595 [4]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46753 [5]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49707 [6]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50990 [7]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50989 [8]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18818 [9]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14872 [10]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14874 [11]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20707

3 4

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by rafael ff1 12 May '12

12 May '12

guichan-allegro4 [1] was meant to provide a fix for guichan's bug FS#29824, therefore it is just a temporary package. The bug report was solved, so the time has arrived: please nuke it! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59206 p.s.: I'm the maintainer. Thanks, Rafael

2 1

[aur-general] (no subject)
by Jagmjp Janpgm 12 May '12

12 May '12

Reach online success with ease using this Home Business Success Kit <a href="http://freeride.meinvorname.de/lastnews/89LeeFerguson/">http://freeride.meinvorname.de/lastnews/89LeeFerguson/</a>

1 0