- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Proposal to disown all of x-demon's packages.
by Thomas Dziedzic 07 Jun '11

07 Jun '11

Hi, I would like to get some opinions on whether I should disown all of x-demon's packages in the aur. His last package update was back in december 2010 and a lot of his packages are outdated. I sent an email explaining to him that he should start maintaining his packages, and I gave him 2 weeks to send me an email or start maintaining his packages. It has been 2 weeks and he hasn't responded. Since it looks like he has not been active for 6 months, I would like for others to be able to take care of his packages. xdemon's packages: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&K=x-demon&do_Search=Go&detail=1&C… xdemon's packages copied to gist for reference in case of complete disownage: https://gist.github.com/1012141

3 3

[aur-general] [PATCH 1/1] TUs can change package names
by Can Celasun 07 Jun '11

07 Jun '11

--- web/html/packages.php | 2 ++ web/lib/pkgfuncs.inc | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ web/template/pkg_details.php | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/web/html/packages.php b/web/html/packages.php index abc6637..9077ce2 100644 --- a/web/html/packages.php +++ b/web/html/packages.php @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ if (current_action("do_Flag")) { $output = pkg_delete_comment($atype); } elseif (current_action("do_ChangeCategory")) { $output = pkg_change_category($atype); +} elseif (current_action("do_ChangeName")) { + $output = pkg_change_name($atype); } html_header($title); diff --git a/web/lib/pkgfuncs.inc b/web/lib/pkgfuncs.inc index 2024aeb..c2ca9bc 100644 --- a/web/lib/pkgfuncs.inc +++ b/web/lib/pkgfuncs.inc @@ -999,3 +999,32 @@ function pkg_change_category($atype) { return __("You are not allowed to change this package category."); } } + +/** + * Change package name + * + * @param string $atype Account type, output of account_from_sid + * @return string Translated error or success message + */ + + function pkg_change_name($atype) { + if (!$atype) { + return __("You must be logged in before you can edit package information."); + } + + if (isset($_GET["ID"])) { + $pid = $_GET["ID"]; + } else { + return __("Missing package ID."); + } + + $newname=$_POST['newname']; + + $dbh = db_connect(); + $q = "UPDATE Packages "; + $q.= "SET Name='".mysql_real_escape_string($newname)."' "; + $q.= "WHERE ID=".intval($pid); + db_query($q,$dbh); + return __("Package updated."); +} + diff --git a/web/template/pkg_details.php b/web/template/pkg_details.php index 0658063..0442a07 100644 --- a/web/template/pkg_details.php +++ b/web/template/pkg_details.php @@ -66,7 +66,22 @@ $out_of_date_time = ($row["OutOfDateTS"] == 0) ? $msg : gmdate("r", intval($row[ <div class="pgboxbody"> <p> - <span class='f2'><?php echo htmlspecialchars($row['Name']) . ' ' . htmlspecialchars($row['Version']) ?></span><br /> + <span class='f2'> + <?php + if (($atype == "Developer" or $atype == "Trusted User")) { + $edit_name = "<form method='post' action='packages.php?ID=".$pkgid."'>\n"; + $edit_name.= "<input type='hidden' name='action' value='do_ChangeName' />"; + $edit_name.= "<input type='text' name='newname' value='".$row['Name']."' />"; + $edit_name.= htmlspecialchars($row['Version']).' '; + $edit_name.= "<input type='submit' value='Change Name' />"; + $edit_name.= "</form>"; + echo $edit_name; + } + else { + echo htmlspecialchars($row['Name']).' ' . htmlspecialchars($row['Version']); + } + ?> + </span><br /> <span class='f3'><a href="<?php echo htmlspecialchars($row['URL'], ENT_QUOTES) . '">' . $row['URL'] ?></a></span><br /> <span class='f3'><?php echo htmlspecialchars($row['Description'], ENT_QUOTES); ?></span> </p> -- 1.7.5.2

11 27

[aur-general] Disown request: lib32-libjpeg6
by rafael ff1 07 Jun '11

07 Jun '11

The maintainer of lib32-libjpeg6 [1] doesn't seem to be around for long time and won't fix the PKGBUILD to build from source code, even though I email him the source tarball in last January. Please disown, so I can fix it. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29929 Thanks, Rafael

2 1

Re: [aur-general] f
by Eduardo Martins Lopes 06 Jun '11

06 Jun '11

http://iespradomayor.es/indexz42X.php

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by KESHAV P.R. 06 Jun '11

06 Jun '11

Hi, Can any TU please delete coreboot-git[1] and librecad-svn[2]. They have been replaced by boot-update[3] (upstream name change) and librecad-git[4] respectively. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36861 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44799 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39388 [4] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48380 Regards. Keshav

2 1

Re: [aur-general] 4
by Eduardo Martins Lopes 06 Jun '11

06 Jun '11

http://fishscraps.com/indexz41X.php

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: lib32-libjpeg-turbo
by rafael ff1 05 Jun '11

05 Jun '11

lib32-libjpeg-turbo [1] is already in multilib repository [2]. Maintainer copied in this email. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46972 [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/lib32-libjpeg-turbo/ Thanks, Rafael

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by Moritz Rudert 05 Jun '11

05 Jun '11

Hi. I think http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21966 (mit-krb5) could be deleted because the same is provided through core/krb5. Thanks -- greetings helios JID: helios(a)wiresphere.de E-Mail: helios(a)h-ix.net spaghetti syndrome is healthy

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by rafael ff1 04 Jun '11

04 Jun '11

(I'm the maintainer of all them) Packages: - lib32-gobject-introspection-bin - lib32-flex - lib32-python2 Reason: - They just make no sense. Not needed and don't work. Thanks, Rafael

2 2

[aur-general] Removal Request: luaevent-prosody
by Dwayne Bent 04 Jun '11

04 Jun '11

Since my original email is stuck in moderation... Please remove luaevent-prosody <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34658>. It doesn't compile with libevent 2.x and its changes have been merged upstream in luaevent 0.3.1. Thanks. -- Dwayne Bent

2 1

[aur-general] deleting phun* from aur
by Thomas Dziedzic 03 Jun '11

03 Jun '11

Just so people know, I will delete phun, phun4-32bit, and phun4-64bit from the aur because of http://www.algodoo.com/wiki/Phun "Phun was the open beta testing version of Algodoo and as such Phun is no longer promoted, developed or supported." Basically, it has moved to algodoo.

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: soqt3
by Fabian Schölzel 03 Jun '11

03 Jun '11

Hello, please delete soqt3, it's not needed by anything and a newer version "soqt" is available in "community". Thanks! https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7602

2 1

[aur-general] [arch-general] Salt update to 0.8.8
by Thomas S Hatch 01 Jun '11

01 Jun '11

I have not mentioned this here for a while, but I am a big fan of seeing what the Arch community is developing, and in the past I have gotten some real interest from the Arch community on this front. I just released Salt 0.8.8, salt is an application used for very fast remote management of systems via zeromq. Salt allows you to manage large groups of servers from a master server with simple commands, and salt also contains functionality for configuration management. Salt is meant to fill the roles of applications like puppet, mcollective, func, cgengine, fabric, Capistrano and many others. The release announcement is here: http://red45.wordpress.com/2011/05/30/salt-0-8-8/ Arch package is here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47512 Video explaining how to use Salt and what it is in detail is here: http://blip.tv/thomas-s-hatch/salt-0-8-7-presentation-5180182 And the (under heavy development) website and docs are here: http://thatch45.github.com/salt-www/ Salt is developed on Arch, but is made to run on any Linux/BSD Let me know what you all think! -Thomas S Hatch

1 0

[aur-general] Duplicate package removal request
by Mark Foxwell 01 Jun '11

01 Jun '11

Hi, The package xarchiver-xz-support [1] is a duplicate of xarchiver-xz [2] and should be deleted. Kind Regards, Mark [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48625 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45726

2 1

[aur-general] changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments
by member graysky 01 Jun '11

01 Jun '11

I maintain the kernel26-ck in the AUR. Once the devs decide on a new name for the kernel package based on the upcoming "3.0" release, either "linux" or "kernel" or "kernel30" or whatever, is it possible to change the name of my "kernel26-ck" PKG and retain all of the comments/votes it has under the current name? Thanks!

5 5

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64: core, extra, community, multilib 27-05-2011
by Stéphane Gaudreault 31 May '11

31 May '11

> extra/libreoffice depends on community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to > pull) extra/libreoffice-extension-ct2n depends on community/cppunit (0 > extra (make)deps to pull) extra/libreoffice-extension-diagram depends on > community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) > extra/libreoffice-extension-hunart depends on community/cppunit (0 extra > (make)deps to pull) extra/libreoffice-extension-nlpsolver depends on > community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) > extra/libreoffice-extension-numbertext depends on community/cppunit (0 > extra (make)deps to pull) extra/libreoffice-extension-oooblogger depends > on community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) > extra/libreoffice-extension-pdfimport depends on community/cppunit (0 > extra (make)deps to pull) > extra/libreoffice-extension-presentation-minimizer depends on > community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) > extra/libreoffice-extension-presenter-screen depends on community/cppunit > (0 extra (make)deps to pull) extra/libreoffice-extension-report-builder > depends on community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) > extra/libreoffice-extension-typo depends on community/cppunit (0 extra > (make)deps to pull) extra/libreoffice-extension-watch-window depends on > community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) > extra/libreoffice-extension-wiki-publisher depends on community/cppunit (0 > extra (make)deps to pull) extra/libreoffice-sdk depends on > community/cppunit (0 extra (make)deps to pull) If there is no objection, I will move (and adopt) cppunit into [extra] before rebuiding for hunspell 1.3.x / icu 4.8. Stéphane

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by speps 31 May '11

31 May '11

Hi, mpd in extra provides jack support since version 0.16.2-2 please delete mpd-jack > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44610 if jack support for mpd in extra is definitive - speps -

2 1

[aur-general] PCSX2 for Archlinux thread
by rafael ff1 31 May '11

31 May '11

Hi all! Just to let you know that there is a sticky thread in PCSX2 forum specifically for Archlinux users. The intention is to put issues, patches and other things in the same thread, which might make easier for arch users have their answer or to contribute. Y'all are welcome! http://forums.pcsx2.net/Thread-PCSX2-for-Archlinux Cheers, Rafael

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Thomas Jost 31 May '11

31 May '11

Hi all, Please delete nvidia-cuda from the AUR: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41380 (I'm the maintainer) It's an old and terribly buggy version of the nvidia driver that was bundled with CUDA 3.2; it doesn't even work with recent kernels or recent xorg versions. Thanks! Regards, -- Thomas/Schnouki

2 1

[aur-general] request: remove 2 entries from AUR (my pkgs)
by member graysky 31 May '11

31 May '11

This pkg is of no value and should be removed. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40544 This pkg duplicates something that is contained in a pkg in [community] and should be removed. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48905 I am the author of each PKG.

2 1

[aur-general] Package Removal Request (openvas-server, openvas-libnasl)
by Vlatko Kosturjak 31 May '11

31 May '11

Hello! Please remove: openvas-server as it is superseeded by openvas-scanner openvas-libnasl as it is superseeded by openvas-libraries Thanks in advance, Kost

3 4

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Seven Seven 31 May '11

31 May '11

Please delete juffed-plugins-svn http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35000 Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Solution for lib32-allegro and lib32-allegro5 ?
by rafael ff1 30 May '11

30 May '11

Hi all! I currently maintain lib32-allegro [1] in its version 5.0. However, I wanted to change its version to 4 (anything less than version5) and add a lib32-allegro5 (anything >=5). The idea is to follow packages allegro [2] and allegro5 [3]. I found a variable "epoch"[4], which if not set in PKGBUILD is equal 0. I could set "epoch=1" to force downgrade to lib32-allegro during the system update and upload to AUR lib32-allegro5 for who wants it. What do you think about this procedure? Any other suggestions? Thanks in advance! -- Rafael [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20892 [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&q=allegro&maintainer=&last_update=… [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23012 [4] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#epoch

1 0

[aur-general] Could anyone help me to adopt libsvm?
by Daniel Lin 30 May '11

30 May '11

I found it is outdated for more then 5 months, but the owner is busy and haven't maintain it.

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Seven Seven 30 May '11

30 May '11

Please delete kdegraphics4-svn and kdeedu4-svn(moved to git) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10690 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10688 Thanks.

2 1