- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] jack-audio-connection-kit-dbus removal
by Daniele Paolella 11 Jan '11

11 Jan '11

Please delete the package jack-audio-connection-kit-dbus (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22535) I uploaded the new release as jack-dbus (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45254) for consistency with jack in [extra], jack2 and jack2-dbus in [community].

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request
by Luca Bennati 11 Jan '11

11 Jan '11

nano-wrap https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20596 -> outdated, orphan, functionality included in official repos

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by notizblock 11 Jan '11

11 Jan '11

hi, i reuploaded the following packages using a python2-pkgname naming scheme: -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37035 -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22977 -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29765 -https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19942 please delete the above packages. thx, -- bbs: nblock aur: notizblock

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: pysztaki
by György Balló 11 Jan '11

11 Jan '11

Accidentally, I uploaded this package in wrong name, please delete it. The correct name is pysztaki-svn. Sorry. City-busz

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan Request
by speps 11 Jan '11

11 Jan '11

Hi, can you please orphan libxml? ==> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15850 The maintainer seems to be inactive since May 2009 The are 3 comments suggesting the x86_64 addition, the last one on August 2010. Also, i need it to work for my libglade-old. Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
by Martti Kühne 11 Jan '11

11 Jan '11

hello http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=Synthead&SeB=m user owns 55 packages and has an invalid e-mail address. does anyone happen to know him (or is willing to google after him)? I wonder. he wouldn't get comment notifications, he wouldn't get ood bumps (afaik both go to that address) and he obviously doesn't get mail sent to his email address directly. I kindly ask for orphaning his dasm package in order to adopt it. regards mar77i ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon(a)googlemail.com> Date: Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:44 AM Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) To: mysatyre(a)gmail.com Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: synthead1(a)comcast.net Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.1.1 Not our Customer (state 14). ----- Original message ----- MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.185.79 with SMTP id cn15mr9556808vcb.54.1294713884783; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:44:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.5.139 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:44:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 03:44:44 +0100 Message-ID: <AANLkTikDQKmXqrSe4QmKKrkGJg_z6i25FR7u7paxqEoy(a)mail.gmail.com> Subject: dasm version bump From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martti_K=C3=BChne?= <mysatyre(a)gmail.com> To: synthead1(a)comcast.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 http://sourceforge.net/projects/dasm-dillon/files/dasm-dillon/2.20.11/

2 2

Re: [aur-general] [Solved] aur bug let me can not update grub4dos
by Daniel Lin 11 Jan '11

11 Jan '11

Sorry, I got a bug report response. And this issue is solved. Thank you.

1 0

[aur-general] aur bug let me can not update grub4dos
by Daniel Lin 11 Jan '11

11 Jan '11

I've post the bug near half year. Recently, I got a user require to renew PKGBUILD. But, I think this is bug of AUR script paring problem. As I know AUR's program will not modify. So, the simple method is delete the entry, let me upload again. If you know the admin of AUR, could you help me to delete the entry of grub4dos. That let me could easy upload a new grub4dos entry. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20672

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Community Cleanup 2011.
by Thomas Dziedzic 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Andrea Scarpino <andrea(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > On Monday 10 January 2011 15:41:23 Andrea Scarpino wrote: >> Can you provide a final list? I did this job some months ago and I don't >> think that we have more orphans packages which can be moved. > Here[1] my previous list (you can edit the page and use it) > > [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Community_Repo_Cleanup > I have edited the link [1] I am proposing this as more of an ultimatum to have 0 orphans by the end of this week. @gordonjcp "python-pyparallel - will adopt, Gordonjcp" still on the list... [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Community_Repo_Cleanup#P…

2 5

Re: [aur-general] Community Cleanup 2011.
by Huub Munstege 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

Hi, no nothing, forget it. Just wanted to send a mail to Thomas directly. Saw afterwards it went to aur-general(a)archlinux.org. Sorry again. best regards ________________________________ Huub Munstege BPE 2836 Bamako, Rep. du Mali Tel: +223 20226397 Port: +223 78370695 ________________________________ ________________________________ From: Andrea Scarpino <andrea(a)archlinux.org> To: Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) <aur-general(a)archlinux.org> Sent: Mon, January 10, 2011 7:38:00 PM Subject: Re: [aur-general] Community Cleanup 2011. On Monday 10 January 2011 11:26:00 Huub Munstege wrote: > This is more of a assigning responsibility to a package sort of thing, > as I said, I would rather have it be in aur and have a maintainer then > be in community and be an orphan. Grass is maintained by Thomas and you already reported your problem on flyspray (FS#22379). So tell me what's the goal of this off topic. -- Andrea Insert mode

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Community Cleanup 2011.
by Andrea Scarpino 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

On Monday 10 January 2011 15:41:23 Andrea Scarpino wrote: > Can you provide a final list? I did this job some months ago and I don't > think that we have more orphans packages which can be moved. Here[1] my previous list (you can edit the page and use it) [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Community_Repo_Cleanup -- Andrea

1 0

[aur-general] Does anyone use tdl?
by Kaiting Chen 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

Just out of curiosity does anyone use tdl? The last release was way back in 2004. --Kaiting. [1]: http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/tdl/ -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/

10 23

[aur-general] Delete request
by Xavier D. 10 Jan '11

10 Jan '11

Hello, Please delete xivo-client-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44283) as it has been renamed to xivo-client-qt-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45228) Thanks!

2 1

Re: [aur-general] partitionmanager-svn problems
by Luca Bennati 09 Jan '11

09 Jan '11

2011/1/9 Andrea Scarpino <andrea(a)archlinux.org> > On Sunday 09 January 2011 13:34:35 Luca Bennati wrote: > > This app https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22778 have problems > in > > the PKBUILD being it over an year old, but upstream is active and > maintainer > > is not: all his packages have been marked outdated. > > What to do? Is it necessary to contact him? > I orphaned Reiser's packages because all are flagged as out-of-date from > time > and with missing make/dependencies; list: > - grub2-btrfs > - hypervideoconverter > - partitionmanager-svn > - qmmp-svn > > -- > Andrea > Well, ok, i sent him the email nonetheless :) I'll upload the new PKGBUILD asap.

1 0

[aur-general] partitionmanager-svn problems
by Luca Bennati 09 Jan '11

09 Jan '11

This app https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22778 have problems in the PKBUILD being it over an year old, but upstream is active and maintainer is not: all his packages have been marked outdated. What to do? Is it necessary to contact him?

3 2

[aur-general] utorrent-server deletion request
by Cédric Girard 08 Jan '11

08 Jan '11

utorrent-server [1] is a duplicate of utserver [2]. It has no maintainer, is outdated and has a bad PKGBUILD. Thanks, [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40600 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40602 -- Cédric Girard

4 11

[aur-general] ipython3 duplicated
by François Boulogne 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Hi, I noticed ipython3 [1] and ipython3-git [2] pkgbuilts are strictly the same. Since, it is synchronized from a git repository, I suggest to remove [1]. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42460 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42461 Cheers, -- François Boulogne. Membre de l'April - Promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre http://www.april.org

2 1

[aur-general] deletion request - xml-light
by Thomas S Hatch 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Please delete xml-light, it is a misnamed duplicate of ocaml-xml-light http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12207

2 2

[aur-general] Removal request
by H.Gökhan SARI 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Hello, There is package named 'nautilussvn' in AUR ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26289) However, this package is obsolete because project is renamed as rabbitvcs and a newer version is published. Newer package is rabbitvcs-nautilus ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34482) So, nautilussvn package should be deleted. Thanks, -- H.Gökhan SARI hsa2(a)difuzyon.net

2 1

[aur-general] please delete pygit2-git
by Hervé Cauwelier 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Hi, I long hesitated between naming my package "pygit2-git" (to follow the upstream name) and python-libgit2-git (to follow the Python naming scheme). I chose the latter and added "pygit2" in the description so people still find it. Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43692 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] [aur general] Seeking the TU wisdom
by Thomas S Hatch 07 Jan '11

07 Jan '11

Ok, I have a bit of a problem with a pair of packages, puppet and facter. As it stands the puppet package in the aur is broken, it builds but it does not run properly. The puppet package in the AUR is configured to run on ruby 1.9, puppet does not run properly on ruby 1.9 yet, and the pacman plugin for puppet that is supplied with the package no longer works properly. The package has also been out of date for a few weeks. I have contacted the maintainer and I was promised that my fixes would be applied, but they were not, so I made a duplicate, puppet-ruby1.8 and facter-ruby1.8, I am using these packages in production and they work very well. I even open up a github account, forked Miah's puppet package, applied the changes and requested a pull as requested. But the package remains out of date and broken, so my question is this, does this constitute grounds for having a TU orphan the packages so I can update them, make them work, and get rid of my duplicates? Or should I continue more diplomatically? -Tom Hatch

4 11

[aur-general] Packages removal request
by Maciej Sitarz 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

Hello all, please remove this packages (all mine): *bash-completion-netcfg* http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24127 reason: merged into official netcfg package *firefox-spell-en-gb* http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30343 reason: hunspell-* packages now include all necessary dictionaries *firefox-spell-pl* http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19409 reason: hunspell-* packages now include all necessary dictionaries Thanks -- Maciek Sitarz

2 1

[aur-general] Temporary inactivity
by Jonathan Conder 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

Hey everyone, I'm off to the beach for a few days, and should be back on Friday if not earlier. Just thought I'd let everyone know, although I doubt anything will need my attention while I'm away. Jonathan

2 2

Re: [aur-general] TU Application -Thomas Hatch
by Christopher Rogers 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

I was working on something that is like quarters. I called it absbb (or ABS Build Bot). I was trying to make a build like slitaz<http://www.slitaz.org/>has for there distro but for arch. I used makerepo to help with making the packages once in chroot. I have not looked at it in a few months since i was busy trying to make slitaz better and updated. https://github.com/godane/devtools-pkgbuild/tree/archbb Also there is archbb script that was just my attempt to combined all of devtools into one big script. That didn't get any auto build bot feature into it. I hope this helps. Also +1 for TU. PS I started releasing my livecd again at http://godane.wordpress.com.

4 5

[aur-general] dkms-virtualbox outdated, orphan
by Martti Kühne 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

...and [1] was last updated in 2007. I'm sure you guys know exactly what to do. :-D http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11663 regards mar77i

2 1