- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Delete request
by widomaker2k7＠gmail.com 06 Nov '10

06 Nov '10

Hello, please delete cid-svn and tvdownloader-svn # cid-svn [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40062 remplace by [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42696 # tvdownloader*svn [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40330 remplace by [4] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42697 Thanks you.

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request
by Xavier D. 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

Hi, Could you orphan the following package as the maintainer doesn't respond and doesn't upgrade a package that is outdated since a long time now : thunar-devel (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20771) ? BRs,

4 5

[aur-general] Delete request
by Christos Nouskas 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

Please, delete kernel26-pf-p4 which is an accidental duplicate of kernel26-pf: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42310 -- X.

2 1

[aur-general] disown request
by Gonzalo Seguel 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

please disown this packages ido: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34437 libindicate: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32049 utouch-geis: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40334 theese packages won't be updated and the mantainers not responds

2 1

[aur-general] packages of user ydossow
by Christian Scharkus 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

Hello. Primary I write this mail because the package lib32-xulrunner is outdated and the old source isn't there anymore. So please disown this package. I have not written a mail to ydossow about this because he seems to have time to make new packages (like qffmpeg-libs) and update some (like 389-console). Beside that it seems there are some duplicates like celt051 and celt0.5.1 that are used by some of his and other packages. Greetings Raubkopierer

2 1

[aur-general] [Delete request] javaloic
by solsTiCe d'Hiver 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

hi javaloic page on sourceforge seems to have been deleted. So I assume the project is dead (?) and the package ought to be deleted (?) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40867 The latest incarnation of LOIC is found on github here is a PKGBUILD for anyone willing to put it on AUR ================================================================ # Contributor: solsTiCe d'Hiver <solstice.dhiver(a)gmail.com> pkgname=loic-git pkgver=20101104 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="Low Orbit Ion Cannon - An open source network stress tool" arch=('i686' 'x86_64') url="http://github.com/NewEraCracker/LOIC" license=('custom:Public Domain') depends=('mono') makedepends=('git' 'monodevelop') provides=('loic') replaces=('loic') source=() md5sums=() _gitroot="https://github.com/NewEraCracker/LOIC.git" _gitname="LOIC" build() { cd "$srcdir" msg "Connecting to GIT server...." if [ -d $_gitname ] ; then cd $_gitname && git pull origin msg "The local files are updated." else git clone $_gitroot $_gitname fi msg "GIT checkout done or server timeout" msg "Starting make..." rm -rf "$srcdir/$_gitname-build" git clone "$srcdir/$_gitname" "$srcdir/$_gitname-build" cd "$srcdir/$_gitname-build" # # BUILD HERE # mdtool build mkdir -p $pkgdir/usr/{bin,lib/LOIC} cp LOIC.ico $pkgdir/usr/lib/LOIC #cp -a Resources $pkgdir/usr/lib/LOIC install -m755 bin/Debug/LOIC.exe $pkgdir/usr/lib/LOIC install -m755 bin/Debug/log4net.dll $pkgdir/usr/lib/LOIC install -m755 bin/Debug/IRC.dll $pkgdir/usr/lib/LOIC cat > $pkgdir/usr/bin/loic << EOB #!/bin/bash cd /usr/lib/LOIC exec mono LOIC.exe "$@" EOB chmod 755 $pkgdir/usr/bin/loic } ================================================================ not fully tested i.e. flood attack

2 1

[aur-general] Request to maintain OpenSCAD
by Atrus 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

I see that the openSCAD package is orphaned. Could I be given the role of maintainer? Thanks, Tim

2 1

[aur-general] [Delete Request] firefox-spell-pt-br
by Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

Please, remove the firefox-spell-pt-br http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7772 With the hunspell-pt-br, the firefox-spell-pt-br it isn't necessary. -- Robson Roberto Souza Peixoto Robinho robsonpeixoto(a)gmail.com Computer Science Master's degree student, University of Campinas Arch Linux Brasil Developer - http://archlinux-br.org Linux Counter #395633 IRC: robsonpeixoto Twitter: http://twitter.com/rrspba github: https://github.com/robsonpeixoto

2 2

Re: [aur-general] Duplicate Packages for "hudson"
by Christian Scharkus 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

I didn't have a look at the packages and so I don't know wether they are apps or leibs but in Carsten of leibs the naming pattern java-* should be prefered imho (debian-like) Greetings Christian Scharkus Am 04.11.2010 09:17 schrieb "Stefan Husmann" <stefan-husmann(a)t-online.de>: Am 04.11.2010 08:46, schrieb Stefan J. Betz: > Good Morning, > > hudson and java-hudson are the same Package. Can anyone please remove > java-hu... Hello, the same is true for http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31630 and http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32080 (nexus and java-nexus). Same maintainers as with hudson and java hudson here, btw. I deleted the "out of date" ones. Stefan

1 1

[aur-general] Duplicate Packages for "hudson"
by Stefan J. Betz 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

Good Morning, hudson and java-hudson are the same Package. Can anyone please remove java-hudson? Greetings Betz Stefan

2 1

[aur-general] [Delete Request] pygoogle
by notizblock 03 Nov '10

03 Nov '10

Hi, pygoogle[1] is dead: „Unfortunately, Google no longer supports the SOAP API for search, nor do they provide new license keys. In a nutshell, PyGoogle is pretty much dead at this point“[2]. The current version was released on 2004-02-26 [3]. I maintained it, because it had been a dependency for w3af until now. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26050 [2] http://pygoogle.sourceforge.net/ [3] http://sourceforge.net/projects/pygoogle/ regards, Florian -- bbs: nblock aur: notizblock

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request
by Peter Lewis 03 Nov '10

03 Nov '10

Hi Alexander, On Wednesday 03 November 2010 09:58:38 Alexander Rødseth wrote: > Could you orphan maniadrive > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5344) It has not been updated > since the 7th of Mars 2007 and the maintainer does not respond to emails. > Thanks in advance. This guy has a lot of packages, none of which have been updated in the last couple of years, from what I can see (and most flagged out of date too). How long did you leave it after emailing him? I orphaned this one, but will these all not be caught in the bulk orphaning thing we agreed recently? (Has that happened yet?) Cheers, Pete.

1 0

[aur-general] Orphan request
by Alexander Rødseth 03 Nov '10

03 Nov '10

Hi, Could you orphan maniadrive (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5344) It has not been updated since the 7th of Mars 2007 and the maintainer does not respond to emails. Thanks in advance. - Alexander Rødseth

1 0

[aur-general] Delete / Orphan request
by kevku 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi Req to orphan following packages, emailed maintainer no reply so far. libp11 libxml-security-c xsd libdigidoc-svn libdigidocpp-svn qdigidoc-svn qesteidutil-svn smartcardpp-svn and deletion of following packages due to renaming and structure changes in the software opensc-esteid firefox-esteid-svn Extra information: Official goverment backed version: https://installer.id.ee/manualinstall_eng.htm Community fork: http://code.google.com/p/esteid/

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request
by Xavier D. 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi, Could you orphan pjproject (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12848) as it's no more updated by the maintainer and he doesn't respond to emails. Thanks in advance. BRs

2 1

[aur-general] aur website default ssl
by Ionuț Bîru 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi, we are now using default https for aur.archlinux.org. Some aur helpers may need adjustment, others like cower/slurpy already works as expected. Kudos for their maintainers for following the aur development -- Ionuț

15 27

[aur-general] [google-talkplugin] How to build an older version of openssl
by Denis A. Altoé Falqueto 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hello, guys. Google Talk Plugin for GMail is not working anymore for me (and others...) because it relies on libssl.so.0.9.8. But for my surprise, the binary GoogletalkPlugin is a 32 bits executable, even for the 64 bits package. It comes right after the original deb package, provided by Google. To make things short, I tried to "downgrade" the lib32-openssl PKGBUILD to version 0,9,8n. It compiles fine, but the resulting libraries (libcrypto.so.0.9.8 and libssl.so.0.9,8) are ELF64, when they should be ELF32. You can view the PKGBUILD in http://pastebin.com/04xsippr So, should I need a 32 bits chroot for that? Shouldn't the multilib compiler be enough? -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto Linux user #524555 -------------------------------------------

2 10

[aur-general] wacom packages up for adoption
by M. Rawash 31 Oct '10

31 Oct '10

well, my laptop got stolen, so I don't think i can keep maintaining these packages for the time being: linuxwacom (obsolete): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16912 linuxwacom-dev (obsolete): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25238 xf86-input-wacom-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32033 tablet-apps: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19783 cheers, M Rawash

2 1

[aur-general] Rename wouxun to own
by Vitaliy Berdinskikh 31 Oct '10

31 Oct '10

Hi! Please rename wouxun to owx Info: http://www.baseciq.org/2010/07/17/wouxun-linux-utility see last comment http://owx.chmurka.net -- Виталий Бердинских UR6LAD 73 & 72!

2 1

[aur-general] Cleaning up aqpm / shaman packages
by Jakob Gruber 30 Oct '10

30 Oct '10

I'd like to remove a few old and broken aqpm / shaman packages. AFAIK, the only working packages in the AUR are aqpm-git[1] and shaman-svn[2] Candidates for removal (depend on an old version of libalpm and don't build anymore): shaman [3] shaman1-git [4] aqpm [5] libaqpm-git [6] Additionally, the following pkgs depend on shaman, I'm not sure what to do with these: shaman-plasma [7] shaman-plasma-svn [8] Any thoughts / objections? [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40830 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40831 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15422 [4] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29028 [5] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29600 [6] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25472 [7] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19166 [8] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19165

1 1

[aur-general] Remove old TOMOYO Packages
by Stefan J. Betz 30 Oct '10

30 Oct '10

Hello, the following TOMOYO related packages are out of date and no longer maintained in AUR: ccs-tools -> Thu, 12 Nov 2009 -> Only useful for old patched kernels kernel26-tomoyo -> Thu, 12 Nov 2009 -> 2.6.31.* is real old, TOMOYO 2.* is already in upstream kernels! nvidia-tomoyo -> Mon, 14 Sep 2009 -> Only useful with kernel26-tomoyo Greetings Betz Stefan

2 1

[aur-general] Remove request: liferea-svn
by Alexander 'hatred' Drozdoff 30 Oct '10

30 Oct '10

Hi guys! Liferea project switch to git instead svn. PKGBUILD for git already present in AUR, so package liferea-svn[1] can be removed. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13568 -- WBR Alexander Drozdov FIDO: 2:5045/41.84 Site: http://hatred.homelinux.net Site: http://archlinux.org.ru

2 1

[aur-general] deletion request: kernel26-systemd
by Dave Reisner 28 Oct '10

28 Oct '10

Please delete the kernel26-systemd package. It set some flags that are no longer necessary with Arch's 2.6.36 build. thanks, dave reisner

2 1

[aur-general] New Trusted User: Lukas Fleischer
by Loui Chang 28 Oct '10

28 Oct '10

Hello TUs With 21 yes, 0 no, and 4 abstains out of 27 active members, we have a 92.5% quorum and a new Trusted User! Lukas please follow the steps described in the Trusted User Guidelines for new members. http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#TODO_list_f… Congrats and welcome!

11 11

[aur-general] pkgstats and unused [community] packages
by Christopher Brannon 28 Oct '10

28 Oct '10

I've been polling <https://archlinux.de/?page=PackageStatistics> regularly for several weeks, and I've noticed that roughly 50% of the packages in [community] are not installed by anyone. Can we get a list of these unused packages? Would it be a good idea to start moving them to [unsupported]? -- Chris

24 43