March 2008 - Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26-2.6.24.3-2
by Tobias Powalowski 06 Mar '08

06 Mar '08

Hi kernel bump release for both arches in testing, please signoff FIXES: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9719 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9689 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9655 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9649 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9593 - added some patches from genpatches Config changes: - added CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=y - added CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK=y greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

6 13

[arch-dev-public] dash package in core?
by Thomas Bächler 06 Mar '08

06 Mar '08

Why is the dash package in core compiled against klibc? It is a package installed inside the normal system, so there is no reason to use klibc. Furthermore, why does the package not depend on klibc? klibc packages have to be recompiled with almost every klibc version and there is no way to know which packages to recompile unless pacman -Qi klibc shows them. (This is another example why not adding dependencies just because they are in base is a bad idea). Right now, /bin/dash will not start.

4 7

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] klibc 1.5-4, klibc-extras 2.3-2, klibc-module-init-tools 3.2.2-2
by Thomas Bächler 06 Mar '08

06 Mar '08

I rebuilt klibc against the 2.6.24 headers and also rebuilt klibc-extras, klibc-module-init-tools and klibc-udev. Please sign off on the first three. klibc-udev has to be updated to 118 before moving to core, Aaron said he'd take care of that, I built 116-3 for now so the rest can be tested.

5 9

[arch-dev-public] filesystem 2008.03 bump with small change?
by Tobias Powalowski 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Hi http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9697 can i change fstab to: /dev/cdrom /media/cd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 /dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 0 thanks greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

5 12

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] dhcpcd 3.2.1
by Tobias Powalowski 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Hi please signoff both arches greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

6 7

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] xfsprogs 2.9.7
by Tobias Powalowski 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Hi version bump please signoff both arches also users can signoff, no dev seems to use xfs. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

1 0

[arch-dev-public] [extra signoff] nvidia/nvidia-utils 169.12-1
by Thomas Bächler 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

New nvidia release, please sign off.

4 5

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] e2fsprogs 1.40.7-1
by Thomas Bächler 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Please, sign off this time ...

4 3

[arch-dev-public] Request add wvdial, wvstreams and xplc to [core]?
by Tobias Powalowski 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Hi just got that reqeust: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9664 well i don't see a problem in adding it to [core], whats your opinion about it? greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

4 4

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] vi, vim and gvim 266
by Tobias Kieslich 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Hi guys, Eric said he can build it for the 64 plattform so these binaries will be up sometime, too, Thanks Eric. Can you guys signoff vi for both architectures, please? It's turning into some kind of hassle that a package with such frequent updates has to undergo the core review process. I have to think about a different system that allows both, good peer reviw for the core vi, but also allows frequent updates for vim and gvim. Suggestions welcome. /me thinks about vim conflicts=(vi), provides=(vi) Thanks, -T

2 1