- Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [arch-dev-public] [aur-general] SCons major revision update
by Ray Rashif 04 Oct '10

04 Oct '10

On 13 July 2010 21:53, Philipp Überbacher <hollunder(a)lavabit.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Ray Rashif's message of 2010-07-13 15:38:04 +0200: >> Currently extra/scons-1.3.0-1 is marked out-of-date, which is probably >> due to the fact that since last month, version 2 has become the stable >> branch upstream. From http://www.scons.org: >> >> "14 June 2010 >> SCons production release 2.0.0.final.0 is now available from the >> download page at SourceForge. This is the production release for the >> 2.0 series. The 2.0 series drops support for all pre-2.4 versions of >> Python. See the ChangeLog for a complete list of changes in the >> release." >> >> Version 1 is still supported, as evidenced by the development branch updates: >> >> "26 June 2010 >> SCons release 1.3.0.d20100626 is now available from the download page >> at SourceForge. Fix the ability to append to default $*FLAGS values >> (which are implemented as CLVar instances) in a copied construction >> environment without affecting the original construction environment's >> value. See the ChangeLog for a complete list of changes in the >> release." >> >> The following are the packages that makedepend on scons: >> >> == extra == >> hydrogen >> ardour >> linuxdcpp >> >> == community == >> ffmpeg2theora >> oregano >> btanks >> kleansweep >> pingus >> dangerdeep >> fceux >> mypaint >> glob2 >> >> We can either update it to version 2 or move version 1 to a scons1 >> package. If there are no objections and build issues, I'll go ahead >> with the former, as it doesn't appear to be that popular to warrant >> both major branches in the repos. > > I do expect issues. There were scons issues with ardour in the past. > ardour3 moved to waf and that's where devlopment is going on. They > likely aren't interested in fixing scons issues when they arise. > I guess testing will scons2 will show which way to go. scons 2.x is now in [testing] - it will replace scons 1.x in [extra]. I had tested all affected packages and they built fine, but for anyone else with corner cases, please file a bug upstream. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD

1 0

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] wpa_supplicant 0.7.3
by Thomas Bächler 04 Oct '10

04 Oct '10

The 0.7 branch of wpa_supplicant is now the stable branch. This is the first Arch package for the new branch, so please test this carefully and sign off. x86_64 has been successfully tested by yours truly with netcfg and wpa_actiond, on a WPA2-PSK network.

3 2

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] hdparm-9.32-1
by Tobias Powalowski 04 Oct '10

04 Oct '10

Hi guys, please signoff both arches greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

2 1

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] linux-firmware 20100911-1
by Thomas Bächler 04 Oct '10

04 Oct '10

Upstream changes: David Woodhouse (2): Remove executable bit from iwlwifi-6050-4.ucode Remove executable bit from ueagle-atm/DSP4p.bin Henry Ptasinski (1): Firmware for brcm80211 driver Jon Mason (1): vxge: Add driver firmware Rajkumar Manoharan (1): ath9k_htc: Update AR7010 firmwares Sujith (1): ath9k_htc: Add firmware for AR7010 dann frazier (1): Add firmware for QLogic Intelligent Ethernet (3000 and 3100 Series) Adapters

2 1

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] flex-2.5.35-4
by Allan McRae 04 Oct '10

04 Oct '10

Flex has not seen a release in a long time and has a couple of issues that should be fixed (e.g. FS#20908). Apply the patchset from Fedora (all also used in Debian). Signoff both, Allan

2 1

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] sysvinit-2.88-2
by Eric Bélanger 04 Oct '10

04 Oct '10

Hi, sysvinit-2.88-2 is in testing. Changes: - Add install scriptlet to reload init (close FS#21013). It should fix unclean unmount when the package is updated like Allan reported in the sigonoff thread for sysvinit-2.88-1 Please test and signoff. Eric

3 2

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26-lts 2.6.32.24-1
by Andreas Radke 03 Oct '10

03 Oct '10

Upstream update. Please signoff. Only one Xen related change. -Andy

2 2

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] packages are newer in extra than in staging
by Allan McRae 03 Oct '10

03 Oct '10

On 03/10/10 09:57, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Ionuț Bîru<ibiru(a)archlinux.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> some packages have been updated in extra and have been mark as done in the >> python todo list but they weren't rebuilt against staging. >> >> looking quick on the list, django (staging removed on 9 september) >> >> extra 1.2.3-1 >> marked as done and nothing in staging. >> >> mercurial >> 1.6.4-1 in extra, 1.6.3-2 in staging >> >> please, check your packages again because i don't intent to fix any of this >> inconsistencies >> >> -- >> Ionuț > > I wrote a script [1] to check for packages in [staging] and > [community-staging] that are not newer than their [core], [extra] and > [community] counterparts. > > So, below are a few more possibly problematic packages. mercurial > isn't included because the ABS tree hasn't been updated with it yet. > > ==> Checking [staging] > denyhosts (2.6-4 isn't newer than 2.6-4 in [extra]) > python-pip (0.8-2 isn't newer than 0.8.1-1 in [extra]) > python-virtualenv (1.4.9-2 isn't newer than 1.5.1-1 in [extra]) > > ==> Checking [community-staging] > cdemu-client (1.2.0-2 isn't newer than 1.3.0-1 in [community]) > griffith (0.11-3 isn't newer than 0.11-3 in [community]) > lilypond (2.12.3-5 isn't newer than 2.12.3-6 in [community]) > openshot (1.2.2-1 isn't newer than 1.2.2-1 in [community]) > python-sphinx (1.0.3-2 isn't newer than 1.0.4-1 in [community]) > recoll (1.13.04-3 isn't newer than 1.14.2-1 in [community]) > trac (0.12-3 isn't newer than 0.12-4 in [community]) > Thanks. I have re-flagged those packages on the TODO list. Everyone, please be careful when updating packages. Either update them in only in the [staging] repo or _both_ the main repo and the staging one. Allan

2 1

[arch-dev-public] mailman, python24, db4.1, db4.5
by Allan McRae 02 Oct '10

02 Oct '10

Hi, The updated mailman package has been in [testing] for a long time now so I am moving it to [extra]. With this we no longer need python24 in to repos so I will remove that to the AUR. That also removes the need for db4.5, so say bye to that too. And while I am at it, say bye to db4.1 which is no longer needed by anything... The next person to update gerolde should take care with mailman as its install has moved from /home/mailman to somewhere more appropriate. That will probably need some intervention. Allan

1 0

[arch-dev-public] packages are newer in extra than in staging
by Ionuț Bîru 02 Oct '10

02 Oct '10

Hi, some packages have been updated in extra and have been mark as done in the python todo list but they weren't rebuilt against staging. looking quick on the list, django (staging removed on 9 september) extra 1.2.3-1 marked as done and nothing in staging. mercurial 1.6.4-1 in extra, 1.6.3-2 in staging please, check your packages again because i don't intent to fix any of this inconsistencies -- Ionuț

1 0