- Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-dev-public] iputils fails on docs
by Tobias Powalowski 15 Oct '10

15 Oct '10

Hi guys, i cannot build new iputils due to fail in docs, osx:/etc/xml/catalog:2:78:E: name expected osx:/etc/xml/catalog:2:18:E: cannot find "PUBLIC"; tried "/etc/xml/PUBLIC", "/usr/share/sgml/PUBLIC", "/usr/share/xml/PUBLIC" osx:arping.sgml:1:0:E: prolog can't be omitted unless CONCUR NO and LINK EXPLICIT NO and either IMPLYDEF ELEMENT YES or IMPLYDEF DOCTYPE YES any help would be much appreciated. thanks greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

3 6

[arch-dev-public] Ghostscript 9.00 hits testing
by Andreas Radke 15 Oct '10

15 Oct '10

It's a major update and probably something with printing and/or pdfviewer will be broken. Please test it. -Andy

3 5

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] hdparm-9.33-1
by Tobias Powalowski 15 Oct '10

15 Oct '10

Hi guys, please signoff both arches hdparm-9.33 - fix AHCI issues in sg16(): don't ask for sense_data on DATA-xfer commands - fix compiler warnings on old systems - fixed compilation on old systems lacking __be16 greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

1 1

[arch-dev-public] Python rebuild on its way to [testing]
by Allan McRae 14 Oct '10

14 Oct '10

Hi all, I am in the process of moving the python rebuild into the [testing] and [community-testing] repositories. There are still a few packages that need rebuilt (the various openoffice incarnations and virtualbox-ose) so if you desperately need them you may want to hold off updating. Other than those packages, this will hopefully be a nice smooth update... I hear some TUs have been running the [staging] repo (which I personally think is crazy!) If you see any of the following, report a bug: * files linked to libpython2.6.so.1.0 * files in /usr/lib/python2.6 or /usr/include/python-2.6 * files with a "#!/usr/bin/python" or "#!/usr/bin/env python" shebang * depends/makedepends/optdepends on "python" instead of "python2" * packages that no longer work... And I mean report a bug... an email is not enough. Allan

5 9

[arch-dev-public] poppler soname bump
by Jan de Groot 13 Oct '10

13 Oct '10

The poppler/poppler-glib update to 0.14 includes a soname bump for poppler and poppler-glib. Packages depending on these libraries should be rebuilt. I already did all packages in extra, some packages in community still need an update. To track the rebuild, a todo list was created: http://www.archlinux.org/todo/38/ Please rebuild these packages in community-testing and flag them as complete after that.

3 3

[arch-dev-public] Warning: MESA 7.9 going to testing
by Andreas Radke 13 Oct '10

13 Oct '10

I'm working on the new MESA release today. Please don't -Syu until all 3D drivers have been rebuild properly. If you have trouble with your card catch me in out IRC channels. -Andy

5 7

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] [signoff] lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.74-1
by Eric Bélanger 12 Oct '10

12 Oct '10

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:03 AM, J. W. Birdsong <jwbirdsong(a)jwbirdsong.homelinux.com> wrote: > On 10/04/10 at 07:42pm, Eric Bélanger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> lvm2/device-mapper 2.02.74-1 are now in testing for an upstream >> update. Please test and signoff. I couldn't test much the i686 >> package except in a chroot so 2 signoffs for i686 would be nice. >> Signoff from users are welcome. >> >> Eric >> >> > Signoff x86_64 > Running fine here encrypt LVM > Yes I rebuilt initramfs/rebooted snowman :) > > Bump. Anyone for i686? Eric

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Update to next major mono version and moonlight
by Daniel Isenmann 11 Oct '10

11 Oct '10

Hi, I will prepare and release the next major version (2.8) of mono to the [extra] repository this week. I will also rebuild all necessary packages, if there are any, normally it isn't necessary. But to the big changes (http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-August/017497.h… and http://mono-project.com/Release_Notes_Mono_2.8) there are maybe some problems, but I don't think so. I will also add moonlight to the [extra] repo, if it's now possible to build the newest version with mono 2.8, I have to check this. Any objections against moonlight? -Daniel

1 0

[arch-dev-public] [devtools] [PATCH] install option (-I) does not require a directory containing a PKGBUILD
by Andrea Scarpino 11 Oct '10

11 Oct '10

When you install a package in a chroot using makechrootpkg -I, the script checks for a PKGBUILD in the current dir. This patch skip this check. >From 00009de3b189660e8d9729f9aead0c9a75bb22aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrea Scarpino <andrea(a)archlinux.org> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:54:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] install option (-I) does not require a directory containing a PKGBUILD --- makechrootpkg | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/makechrootpkg b/makechrootpkg index 572a215..65db5c5 100755 --- a/makechrootpkg +++ b/makechrootpkg @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ if [ "$EUID" != '0' ]; then exit 1 fi -if [ ! -f PKGBUILD ]; then +if [ ! -f PKGBUILD -a -z "$install_pkg" ]; then echo 'This must be run in a directory containing a PKGBUILD.' exit 1 fi -- 1.7.3.1 -- andreascarpino.it Arch Linux Developer

1 0

[arch-dev-public] new pkg for extra: LXDM
by Andreas Radke 10 Oct '10

10 Oct '10

LXDM had a nice stable release 0.3.0 a few weeks ago and is ready to use. It's the best light weight alternative we have next to gdm/kdm and slim/xdm. I know about Jürgens ask for help on lxde packages but I'd like to maintain lxdm in extra independent from lxde as an option for Xfce users. Any objections? -Andy

2 2