- Arch-dev-public - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-dev-public] libjpeg-7 rebuilds
by Allan McRae 30 Jun '09

30 Jun '09

Hi all, I just created the TODO list for the libjpeg rebuilds (130 packages!). I will do an initial set of rebuilds that should hopefully allow everybody to boot into their desktop environment and then put out all call for help doing the rest of the builds. Note that I will not be pushing anything until the readline builds are moved which I assume will be soon after the community server is up. Allan

1 1

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] glib2 2.20.4
by Jan de Groot 29 Jun '09

29 Jun '09

Please signoff for both architectures. Overview of Changes from GLib 2.20.3 to GLib 2.20.4 =================================================== * Bug fixes: 579449 FileChoosers no longer work if an idle handler is active 579933 mainloop FD_CLOEXEC has a race condition 585088 g_string_chunk_insert_len stops at nul bytes 585360 Monitor fontconfig configuration files using gio causes m... 585478 don't leak the inotify fd 585520 Wrong warning option in documentation 585676 GEmblem doesn't reference its 'icon' if that is set as a ... 585726 Grammatical error in GList documentation 586868 g_filename_complete_get_completions doesn't always return... * Updated translations: Bengali India Punjabi

3 2

[arch-dev-public] [idea] global link database for all packages
by Pierre Schmitz 29 Jun '09

29 Jun '09

Hi, I just got an idea which might be worth to think about. Namcap is quite useful but due to its limitation of only seeing a certain pkg file at a time it cannot answer all questions. The idea is to create a database (similar to the file list we already create) which includes lists of files and to which they are linked. Dumping this togehter with our pkgdb and file lists in a hughe SQL db we can answer questions such as: * What are the hidden deps of a package? * Which pacakge need a rebuld if I bump a certain package? * Find missing deps * What happens if I remove a dep from a package? ** e.g. if I remove openssl as dep for Qt I need to review every package that directly or indirectly depends on Qt and check if it needs openssl (which was hidden by the Qt dep before) * Maybe check for so name conflicts or packages providing the same one? (libgl, java) * check a package deps without the need to actually install its deps. (like namcap) I made a quick and dirty script based on the createFileLists script: http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre/tmp/createLinkLists.txt It should work fine and even incremental but its runtime is awful. So, if you think that might be a good idea there is a lot of room for improvements. I don't know if its possible with bash but we don't really need to extract every file: * check if a file is an elf file * extract the header * move to next file -- Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre

4 10

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] grep-2.5.4-2
by Allan McRae 29 Jun '09

29 Jun '09

Hi, This fixes case insensitive search issues reported in FS#14877 Signoff both arches. Allan

2 5

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check x86_64 26-06-2009
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 26 Jun '09

26 Jun '09

======================================== = Integrity Check x86_64 of core,extra = ======================================== Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking for circular dependencies Missing Dependencies ---------------------- archboot --> 'portmap>=6.0-2' archboot --> 'vim>=7.2.166-1' archboot --> 'rt2500>=1.1.0_B4-27' archboot --> 'netcfg>=2.2.0b1-1' Missing Makedepends --------------------- hplip --> 'portmap' v86d --> 'kernel26<2.6.30' bcprov --> 'java-gcj-compat' gnome-speech --> 'espeak' Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends -------------------------------- core/crda depends on extra/python-m2crypto core/iputils depends on extra/opensp core/iputils depends on extra/libxslt core/iputils depends on extra/docbook-xsl core/e2fsprogs depends on extra/bc core/syslog-ng depends on extra/libcap core/sqlite3 depends on extra/tcl core/ca-certificates depends on extra/ruby Summary --------- Missing PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names: 0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid archs: 0 Missing (make)dependencies: 8 Repo hierarchy problems: 8 Circular dependencies: 0

1 0

[arch-dev-public] Integrity Check i686 26-06-2009
by repomaint＠archlinux.org 26 Jun '09

26 Jun '09

====================================== = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra = ====================================== Performing integrity checks... ==> parsing pkgbuilds ==> checking mismatches ==> checking archs ==> checking dependencies ==> checking makedepends ==> checking for circular dependencies Missing Dependencies ---------------------- archboot --> 'portmap>=6.0-2' archboot --> 'vim>=7.2.166-1' archboot --> 'rt2500>=1.1.0_B4-27' archboot --> 'netcfg>=2.2.0b1-1' Missing Makedepends --------------------- hplip --> 'portmap' v86d --> 'kernel26<2.6.30' bcprov --> 'java-gcj-compat' gnome-speech --> 'espeak' Repo Hierarchy for Makedepends -------------------------------- core/crda depends on extra/python-m2crypto core/iputils depends on extra/opensp core/iputils depends on extra/libxslt core/iputils depends on extra/docbook-xsl core/e2fsprogs depends on extra/bc core/syslog-ng depends on extra/libcap core/sqlite3 depends on extra/tcl core/ca-certificates depends on extra/ruby Summary --------- Missing PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid PKGBUILDs: 0 Mismatching PKGBUILD names: 0 Duplicate PKGBUILDs: 0 Invalid archs: 0 Missing (make)dependencies: 8 Repo hierarchy problems: 8 Circular dependencies: 0

1 0

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] binutils-2.19.1-4
by Allan McRae 26 Jun '09

26 Jun '09

Fix linker scripts (/usr/lib/lib{bfd,opcodes}.so). Signoff both arches. Allan

2 2

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.30-3
by Tobias Powalowski 25 Jun '09

25 Jun '09

Hi guys, kernel26-2.6.30-3 please signoff, both arches. Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges Arch Linux bugfixes: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15067 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14879 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14485 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14958 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14923 -> #closing won't implement aufs doesn't work seperated! http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15071 - Fixed latest issues with kms - fixed wmi_acer module hang Arch Linux changes: - removed snd-pcspkr module #14958 - changed to lzma kernel compression - removed dsdt patch, it doesn't work anymore, probably we can remove it forever. Please shout out loud, if you really need this! - added dccp #15071 - remove rt2500 when moving to core repository Intel kms forum link: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=528543 Remove binary modules from extra? Guys opinions on this? Got madwifi compiled again: madwifi -> move from core to extra # supported by ath5k and ath9k normally openswan-klisp -> AUR # broken since ages Enjoy have fun and give me feedback, greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

7 11

[arch-dev-public] [signoff] fakeroot-1.12.4-1
by Allan McRae 25 Jun '09

25 Jun '09

Another upstream update. Signoff both arches Allan

2 1

Re: [arch-dev-public] [arch-general] readline GPL violation on two pkgs?
by Tobias Powalowski 24 Jun '09

24 Jun '09

Am Mittwoch 24 Juni 2009 schrieben Sie: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Gerardo Exequiel > > Pozzi<vmlinuz386(a)yahoo.com.ar> wrote: > > Pierre Chapuis wrote: > >> Le Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:22:03 -0300, > >> > >> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <vmlinuz386(a)yahoo.com.ar> a écrit : > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I just do a quick scan of soft linked with readline and I think that > >>> these two pkgs that are linked with readline violates GPL: > >>> > >>> extra/tftp-hpa > >>> community/ngspice > >>> > >>> Both have the "old" BSD (4-clause) license and is linked with readline > >>> that is GPL, so there is an incompatibility [#1] > >> > >> For tftp-hpa, the license used in the PKGBUILD looks wrong. tftp-hpa is > >> "available under the same license as the "OpenBSD" operating system", > >> and OpenBSD uses a 3-clause license. > >> > >> I guess the packager just copied a part of > >> http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html without looking further : > >> > >> "Berkeley rescinded the 3rd term (the advertising term) on 22 July 1999. > >> Verbatim copies of the Berkeley license in the OpenBSD tree have that > >> term removed." > > > > Hi, > > > > See the source code, is "old" BSD, or maybe the author forgot to update > > the license ? for example tftp/main.c uses 4-clause and uses readline. > > You think we should just remove the package? We have alternate tftp > implementations, right? Hrm, i think pxelinux needs this tftp and gentoo builds it the same way, if we start to pick on those it's horrible. I never heared that bsd licensed software isn't allowed to link against gpl software. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

1 0