- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] gcc -m64
by Ciprian Dorin, Craciun 07 Nov '09

07 Nov '09

Hello all! I have ArchLinux i686 version, but I'm trying to compile an x86_64 kernel... And you've guessed... Not supported by the ArchLinux stock gcc / binutils... I've done the "raining" dance, by trying to compile my own gcc / binutils, but it didn't "rain" (I mean it didn't work)... Any pointers? Thanks, Ciprian. P.S.: Is there any good reason for which there isn't even a separate package of gcc that is able to do this? (I've read the bug from one year ago, but no good reason was specified...) P.P.S.: I'm missing Debian...

4 7

[arch-general] Installing Arch on Hannsnote
by Dario 07 Nov '09

07 Nov '09

Ciao! I want to share my (not so positive) experience about installing Arch Linux on a Hannsnote netbook, which I have been unexpectedly given as a gift recently:) I used the USB image, "burned" on a usb stick (usb-urned:)). The install went fine except when it tried to install GRUB. The installer hanged (don't know if it really hanged or if it just wanted to use all the CPU for some time), but I went about it by manually installing GRUB, so this is not really a problem. The Intel 945GME is recognized, but all I get from X is a blank screen, if using the intel driver or leaving the duty to a config-less X, or doing some other tricks from the wiki and the forum. No errors whatsoeverm though, just a black dead screen. The vesa driver worked fine, but stuck at 800x600. Finally, I couldn't work out a way to use the wireless card, a Ralink 2860 or something. I mean, not even the interface was shown, even if modules were - at least to me - correctly loaded. Having tried Puppy Linux before with success, I knew that things should have worked. Now, I installed Kubuntu Netbook edition and everything works out of the box. Unfortunately it won't last long on my laptop, its interface is scarying:) I'd really like to archify my netbook. It came with XP preinstalled, but I cannot use it without a Linux operating system, for practical and also psychological reasons (no, not ideological:) ). If someone had a similar experience to share, I'd be happy:) Thanks in advance!!! Dario Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com

2 2

[arch-general] Problem with hard disk - not arch related
by Dario 07 Nov '09

07 Nov '09

Ciao! This is unrelated to arch, but I wanted to tell this to the list because maybe someone has a clue. I have recently bought and installed a new sata hard disk. It has a couple of partitions, one with XFS which I use as storage. It generally works fine, but sometimes something happens and it cease to work. I don't know if it's the disc's fault, because at the next restart the problems are gone. It seems that the controller sometimes gets lost. Dmesg says this: ata4.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 ata4.00: BMDMA stat 0x25 ata4.00: cmd 35/00:20:e7:a0:f1/00:01:04:00:00/e0 tag 0 dma 147456 out res 51/84:11:e7:a0:f1/84:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error) ata4.00: status: { DRDY ERR } ata4.00: error: { ICRC ABRT } ata4: soft resetting link ata4.00: configured for UDMA/133 ata4: EH complete ... (repeat some time) .... ata4.00: qc timeout (cmd 0x27) ata4.00: failed to read native max address (err_mask=0x4) ata4.00: HPA support seems broken, skipping HPA handling ata4.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5) ata4: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0) ata4: soft resetting link ata4: SRST failed (errno=-16) ata4: reset failed, giving up ata4: EH complete ... sd 3:0:0:0: [sdc] Unhandled error code sd 3:0:0:0: [sdc] Result: hostbyte=0x04 driverbyte=0x00 end_request: I/O error, dev sdc, sector 82953831 ... I/O error in filesystem ("sdc2") meta-data dev sdc2 block 0x104d6d83 ("xlog_iodone") error 5 buf count 6656 xfs_force_shutdown(sdc2,0x2) called from line 1043 of file fs/xfs/xfs_log.c. Return address = 0xf9c8d923 Filesystem "sdc2": Log I/O Error Detected. Shutting down filesystem: sdc2 Please umount the filesystem, and rectify the problem(s) ... Buffer I/O error on device sdc2, logical block 603726 lost page write due to I/O error on sdc2 So, what should I look for? Together with the disk, I installed an Nvidia 9800 GT, which could also be the culprit, because maybe I haven't a proper power unit etc. - or not? Thanks in advance to everybody! Ciao a tutti Dario Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com

2 4

[arch-general] Mayday - Installed Fresh Archlinux on Laptop - Resolution stuck 1152x864, need 1440x900??
by David C. Rankin 06 Nov '09

06 Nov '09

Listmates, New drive for my laptop so I dedicated it to Arch. Net install with 2009.08 went fine (although there really should be a warning when you leave install WITHOUT configuring the bootloader). [the /arch/setup menu autoadvances when you leave Configure System and if you click Done and downarrow anticipating moving to the next item, you can easily miss configuring the bootloader (I did ;-)] The problem I have is that my laptop is stuck in 1152x864 resolution. For the text install that is fantastic, but when you start kde -- not so good. (should be 1440x900) The card is an RS690M (radeon 1200) and the radeon driver was loaded by default. The modules configured are: 22:46 alchemy:~> lsmod | grep rad radeon 716352 1 ttm 43776 1 radeon drm 191392 2 radeon,ttm i2c_algo_bit 6980 1 radeon i2c_core 25664 4 radeon,i2c_piix4,drm,i2c_algo_bit THE WEIRD PART... I have Arch on the drive I just took out and it goes to 1440x900 just fine. I am not using an xorg.conf, so I am pretty much at X's mercy. I use /etc/rc.d/kdm start from runlevel 3 to start kdm. It goes to 1152x864 instead of 1440x900. I don't understand how to control the new KMS stuff. I have check the kde4 settings for Display Size and Orientations, but the maximum allowed is 1152x864: http://www.3111skyline.com/download/bugs/kde4/kde4-syssettings-display.jpg http://www.3111skyline.com/download/bugs/kde4/kde4-syssettings-1164.png What is the trick? Also, when I try to start xdm from inittab with the default x:5:respawn:/usr/bin/xdm -nodaemon I get the disabling for 5 seconds, respawning too fast error. So, what's the trick here? I bet there related... I have put the Xorg.0.log on the server as well: http://www.3111skyline.com/download/bugs/kde4/Xorg.0.log It looks like the dang thing is using the vesa driver?? I'll add radeon to modules, but It's loaded already so I don't think that's going to help. Anybody know what's happening here? This is the first install where I haven't installed KDE3, so i don't know if that is a part of the issue either. Any help would be greatly appreciated. If you need to see anything else, just let me know. Thanks. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com

6 10

[arch-general] kde4 only install - how do I get quanta?? how do I cnf the kde3 runtime environment?
by David C. Rankin 06 Nov '09

06 Nov '09

Guys, This is the first time I have done a install that doesn't include kde3 and I'm running into a few problems: (1) I can't find quanta -- where is it hiding? (2) how does one configure the default font size, etc.. for the kde3-runtime-base without the kde3 control center? kcmshell for the kde3 runtime base list no modules?? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com

3 4

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] makechrootpkg: Use the host's SRCDEST and PKGDEST if they are defined
by Rogutės Sparnuotos 06 Nov '09

06 Nov '09

Daenyth Blank (2009-11-05 13:07): > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 13:03, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I was thinking more along the lines of: > > > > Original: eval $(grep '^SRCDEST=' /etc/makepkg.conf) > > > > SRCDEST=$(grep '^SRCDEST=' /etc/makepkg.conf | cut -d= -f2) > > PKGDEST=$(grep '^PKGDEST=' /etc/makepkg.conf | cut -d= -f2) > > > > I believe that should work... Make sure to throw in a -d -w check > after, to make sure it's right... I think a malicious line (".. && rm > -rf /") would simply get stored as a string.. as long as we quote > everything properly and unset it if it's not right, I'm pretty sure > it's not dangerous. It could however, fail in cases where it's split > over multiple lines. I don't think that's a reason not to do it > though, I can't imagine a reason for such a thing. This wouldn't work for SRCDEST="/path/to/dir" SRCDEST='/path/to/dir' But sed should be able to do it: SRCDEST=$(sed -nr "/^SRCDEST=/{s/[^=]+=(['\"]?)(.+)\1/\2/p}" /etc/makepkg.conf) -- -- Rogutės Sparnuotos

2 1

[arch-general] S3-level ACPI suspend
by b4283 05 Nov '09

05 Nov '09

Hi, I've had some nice experiences with Windows(XP)'s suspend functionality, and it seems to work on all machines I've worked with. and the other day I just had a successful resume on my machine with "s2ram -f -m -p", but it takes like a minute for it to fully recover to a terminal (tty/1). (ps: my computer is a desktop with AMD RS780 chipset, which isn't supported by KMS yet) Unlike Windows ones, which only take like 3-5 seconds to wake up, linux takes much longer, I don't know if this is common... My question is: What's the average resume time of yours, and is it possible to be any faster ?

6 9

[arch-general] Fresh install of 2009.08 -> hal, dbus, PK - no mount of usb for normal user (again...)
by David C. Rankin 05 Nov '09

05 Nov '09

Guys, I did a fresh install of 2009.08 on a new drive for my laptop. For the past 8 months, I have never gotten the freedesktop.org -- removable policy to work. (well, maybe for a week or so before the kernel change in July). I wanted to make sure I got it right this time so I haven't monkeyed with the policies yet. In kde4, all of my removable devices are properly recognized (usb sticks, 2.5" laptop drives connected via usb, etc.). Despite being recognized properly, (1) the user cannot access the drives - until root has accessed them (like opening konqueror su) (2) none of the drives are mounted for the user under /media - until root has accessed them What makes no sense to me is that after root has accessed the drives, the user can use them (I guess the actual "mount" occurs when root access the drives, even though kde4 shows them as connected for the user through the notifier popup in the task bar) I finally just wrote a script to mount removables under /mnt that can be called by the users (basically uses sudo to mount and case on partition name and size to mount the drives on the proper mount points) Something has got to give. I've wiki'ed myself into a coma and still -- no joy. If one of the arch mount-removable gurus would just slip me the secret, I would be much abliged :-) It has to be simple, but simplicity has escaped me for quite some time now. However, I am determined to get it right with the new install. I know the wiki well, but where is the other document that I can use along with the wiki to make sure I have a good working system? Thanks for any help you can give. Sincerely yours, "stumped by hal, dbus and PK. Rankin" -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com

4 4

[arch-general] APM gets re-enabled after awake from suspend
by Karol Babioch 05 Nov '09

05 Nov '09

Hi, my hard drive suffers from the "clicking" problem, therefore I deactivated the APM (Advanced Power Management) totally. I'm doing this using hdparm in the /etc/rc.local, making sure that it gets executed every time I boot up my machine. However I noticed that the APM gets re-enabled after I wake my machine up from Suspend-to-RAM, which makes the hard drive clicking again. I'm now wondering whether this is "normal"? I guess so, as the hard drive gets disabled during the suspend, and after a wake-up it gets re-enabled, so any changed made with hdparm don't get stored. Is this intention right? Secondly I want to know what would be the right file (place) to fix this. I'll have to execute the hdparm command again, but don't quite know where to put it, or at least where it should be put ;). -- Best regards, Karol Babioch <karol(a)babioch.de>

3 4

[arch-general] preferred laptops.
by Eric Jacobs 05 Nov '09

05 Nov '09

Hello fello archers.. I've recently been going through a bit of a rough patch with my laptop usage.. I had a 15" macbook pro (dual booted with arch linux), which I recently sold because I thought it was ugly, the mouse didn't work very well, and frankly I was trying to de-appletize myself :).. I just received my refurbished dell studio 14z and got arch up and running on it, but I can't decide if I like it or not.. I haven't gotten used to the mouse yet. The resolution is less than desirable. (13 something x 7 something). And there isn't a latch on the lid.. but I do like the size, aesthetics, weight, and the keyboard feels nice.. So I'm asking you, if you have a laptop, what kind is it? Does arch run pretty well on it (synaptics, sleep/wake, etc.)? What window manager do you think works best with the touchpad (I'm using gnome now)? Any input would be appreciated. ------------------------------ -Eric Jacobs

13 16

[arch-general] file system capabilities
by Shridhar Daithankar 05 Nov '09

05 Nov '09

Hi, I was reading thr. /. commentary on the latest linux kernel bug, got drifted into file system capabilities. and got this, (from http://lwn.net/Articles/313838/) [root@presario shridhar]# ls -la /bin/ping -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 33360 2008-10-04 17:48 /bin/ping [root@presario shridhar]# chmod u-s /bin/ping [root@presario shridhar]# setcap cap_net_raw=ep /bin/ping [root@presario shridhar]# ls -al /bin/ping -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 33360 2008-10-04 17:48 /bin/ping [root@presario shridhar]# exit shridhar@presario ~$ ping 192.168.1.5 PING 192.168.1.5 (192.168.1.5) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.219 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.354 ms ^C --- 192.168.1.5 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 999ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.219/0.286/0.354/0.069 ms so can this be done by default? thus reducing setuid usage? it should improve security right? -- Shridhar

7 7

[arch-general] Swfdec Gnash
by Lars Tennstedt 05 Nov '09

05 Nov '09

Hi there, the current problem with the new Xorg and the NVIDIA legacy driver and the progress of the nouveau driver let me think about removing the another last proprietary package on my systems. Please tell me of your experience with Swfdec and Gnash for example with YouTube and other flash content. Thanks for your time! Bye Lars

2 2

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Load_Cycle_Count and storage-fixup
by Damjan Georgievski 05 Nov '09

05 Nov '09

>> Anyone else has some opinion about how to handle this? > > I'd like to affirm the opinions of Roman and Xavier and take some action on > this. > > Anyone object to my putting storage-fixup in [extra] at least? If no > objections by W 9/21, I plan to go ahead with that step. If it works out, we > can talk about follow-up steps like: > > 1) moving it to [core] > 2) integrating it into default rc.d scripts > > It's a pretty serious issue for laptop users with affected drives. And the > drives are pretty popular ones, methinks. Also note that, when raising awerness about this issue, the fixup ussually needs to be run on resume from disk (and I think resume from ram) too. Not only on boot. -- damjan

10 17

[arch-general] Radeon (xf86-video-ati) verdict
by David C. Rankin 05 Nov '09

05 Nov '09

After working with the ati driver instead of the radeonhd driver, I must say I am very impressed with the KMS implementation. It works much, much better than in the past (performance is still way short of fglrx, and it is still much HOTTER than fglrx , but screen artifacts are virtually eliminated, desktop effects are good, and compiz works very well with the driver. Helluva job Arch team! -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com

3 3

Re: [arch-general] Preferred Laptops
by Sherry Howell 04 Nov '09

04 Nov '09

> Hello fello archers.. > > I've recently been going through a bit of a rough patch with my laptop > usage.. I had a 15" macbook pro (dual booted with arch linux), which I > recently sold because I thought it was ugly, the mouse didn't work very > well, and frankly I was trying to de-appletize myself :).. > > I just received my refurbished dell studio 14z and got arch up and running > on it, but I can't decide if I like it or not.. I haven't gotten used to > the mouse yet. The resolution is less than desirable. (13 something x 7 > something). And there isn't a latch on the lid.. but I do like the size, > aesthetics, weight, and the keyboard feels nice.. > > So I'm asking you, if you have a laptop, what kind is it? Does arch run > pretty well on it (synaptics, sleep/wake, etc.)? What window manager do you > think works best with the touchpad (I'm using gnome now)? > > Any input would be appreciated. > > ------------------------------ > -Eric Jacobs I've dumped OSX and am happily running arch on my macbook 4.1. I'm not suggesting you go spend the money on one, but if you did, you'd be very happy with it. Once I figured out how to get past the EFI boot system, the only thing I've had issues with at all is getting lirc to work correctly, and I can't for the life of me figure out why. Tried everything! But, wireless works excellent - broadcom and all. The synaptics simply needed a little tweaking using the instructions gleaned from the ubuntu forum. Sleep and wake worked out of the box. Every window manager I've tried worked great with the touchpad. I used kde 4 for a while, but have settled finally on xfce because it reminds me more of my first linux machine (fvwm on an old pb 486). Plus it's a lot of fun hearing "Oh, how cool, you've got a macbook -- what the heck is that?!?" --Sherry Howell

2 1

Re: [arch-general] Arch Linux Magazine
by Daniel J Griffiths 04 Nov '09

04 Nov '09

Loui Chang wrote: > Hey guys. I'm just curious. What's going on with the magazine? > Is there any intent to revive it? > > I know that I'd look forward to news/forum summaries at least if there > isn't time for all the other stuff. > > Cheers. > > I received the above email from Loui on the 31st and have been putting a good deal of thought into the current magazine/newsletter situation. As many of you know, Kensai recently moved and got married and I recently moved and have been trying to find a job. Shortly before receiving this email, Kensai and I had discussed the issue, but we didn't come to any real decisions. Hence, I'm sending my thoughts to the community and letting you in on the discussion. One of the possibilities that was brought up was separating the newsletter and magazine, much as it was when I first started AUM. I do not believe this is a good course of action due to one of the main reasons for the merger: the licensing rights to the Arch name and logo. While the magazine did well on its own, I simply can't afford to maintain the domain and server for it without help from the community, but I can't accept financial contributions for said project as long as it is using Arch branding. On the other hand, leaving it the way it is is proving difficult. I don't know Kensai's current situation, but I'm seeing less and less of him online which makes submission of any completed magazine/newsletter issues difficult as he is the only one with upload rights to the server currently on staff. My situation has settled down enough that I am now able to dedicate the time necessary to continue production of the magazine/newsletter as I used to. In fact, I have a good bit of content ready for the next release, whenever that becomes possible. I would like to see the magazine/newsletter make a comeback to where we were when we left off and then some. I want to see more community contributions, writers, I'd like to get the Schwag report back (Dusty, that's you if you're still up to it), etc. This is a big project that has greatly benefited our community and I hate to see it in it's current state. Please let me know what you all think so that we can expedite the release of another issue! @Kensai: Let me know what your current situation is (I know how being a newlywed is, been there a few times now...), and either way, best of luck (hopefully your luck is better than my first attempt was).

2 1

[arch-general] google wave
by Jonathan Brown 04 Nov '09

04 Nov '09

Hi all, I know this is off-topic, but does anyone have a google wave invite that they just don't know who to give to? :) If so, I'm a bit desparate to try it out! Would be much appreciated and I would return the favor to others! jbssfl(a)gmail.com --Jon

38 75

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Vacation Nov 7th - 14th
by Evangelos Foutras 02 Nov '09

02 Nov '09

(I couldn't reply to arch-dev-public, so I'm forwarding my message to arch-general.) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] Vacation Nov 7th - 14th Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:33:26 +0200 From: Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis(a)gmail.com> To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development <arch-dev-public(a)archlinux.org> References: <d64a48980911020949v35fc468cq8dd10afa9efe7f06(a)mail.gmail.com> <4AEF1DEA.5080902(a)archlinux.org> Thomas Bächler wrote: > Aaron Griffin schrieb: >> But, if you need anything, I'm fairly certain you guys can handle it. >> All of you doing admin type work seem competent enough to deal with >> anything that comes up, so I will not have anything to worry about. > > Anything except the current hard drive failure, but I guess you > settled the funds issue already today. Have a nice week. Does this mean that RAID 1 is used and one of the two drives failed? :) Also, is there a page describing the current Arch server(s) setup? I remember reading something about Xen being used and I'd be interested in knowing more. I understand this information is only useful to the admins, but I'm curious.

2 2

[arch-general] Encrypting remote system
by Karol Babioch 02 Nov '09

02 Nov '09

Hi, I'm wondering whether there is a possibility to encrypt a remote system using Arch Linux? I have installed Arch on a remote server, and don't like the idea that anyone with physical access to my system has access to my data. So is there something I can do about it? Using dm-crypt (with luks) doesn't work at all, as I can't input the passphrase when I reboot my system, the technician would really hate me if I ask them to attach a remote console each time I reboot my system. So is there anything I can do? -- Best regards, Karol Babioch <karol(a)babioch.de>

5 5

[arch-general] libtorrent-rasterbar
by Damien Churchill 02 Nov '09

02 Nov '09

I've attached an updated PKGBUILD (just a simple version and md5sum update) for the libtorrent-rasterbar package. The upcoming Deluge 1.2 release depends on libtorrent-rasterbar >= 0.14.5 so I thought I'd assist a little there. Damien

1 0

[arch-general] editors graphic, video new (to archlinux) encoder decoder theora
by andrew james 02 Nov '09

02 Nov '09

news at 2009 09 http://theora.org/news/ the library encoder decoder theora version 1.1 was rewritten. It is "largely an improvement to the Theora encoder <http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/09/theora-1-1-released/>" this library is old in the repository arch also, ffmpeg2theora, "A simple converter to create Ogg Theora files", is a binary that (I know slightly) depends to the library is old in the repository arch. ffmpeg2theora-0.25 'use new libtheora 1.1' http://v2v.cc/~j/ffmpeg2theora/index.html I am inexperienced with package management, for example the maintainers may know a conflicts or insecurity that is the reason to serve the old. However, this news is relevant. I will continue to act as a reporter to improve the quality of our community. andrew

2 2

[arch-general] Nouveau doesn't get loaded without config file?
by Magnus Therning 02 Nov '09

02 Nov '09

I had some problems with my Xorg nv driver this morning, and people suggested I switch to the nouveau driver instead. When trying it X didn't seem to notice that it's available. Do I really need to have an X configuration file in order to use it? /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe

3 2

[arch-general] [signoff] mdadm-3.1-1
by Tobias Powalowski 02 Nov '09

02 Nov '09

Hi bump to latest version, please signoff. Due to lack of hardware also users can signoff. Please update and recreate your initcpio after upgrading. One thing i observed, when using a custom /etc/mdadm.conf file our rc.sysinit will run mdadm --assemble --scan, which will always give exit code 2, due to devices busy. Thanks. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

1 0

[arch-general] [signoff] dmraid-1.0.0.rc16-1
by Tobias Powalowski 02 Nov '09

02 Nov '09

Hi bump to latest version, please signoff. Due to lack of hardware also users can signoff. Please update and recreate your initcpio after upgrading. Thanks. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

2 1

[arch-general] [signoff] samba 3.4.x
by Tobias Powalowski 02 Nov '09

02 Nov '09

Hi guys and users, bumped to new samba 3.4.x series, i only use it very rudimentary. It's a major version upgrade, please give me a signoff on it. Thanks. greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

1 0