Aur-general March 2010

aur-general@lists.archlinux.org

83 participants
78 discussions

Start a nNew thread

[aur-general] please remove package kernel-debug
by Marc Cousin 07 Mar '10

07 Mar '10

Sorry, I messed up uploading a package : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35266 Can it be deleted ? Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Orphaning request for go-openoffice-de
by Adam Hani Schakaki 07 Mar '10

07 Mar '10

Hello, go-openoffice-de had no updates a long time and it is updated. The maintainer didn't manage it to update, as he said. I couldn't reach the maintainer by comment or email, so I created a new one (go-openoffice-de-lang), which works. So I request orphaning and may be refactoring go-openoffice-de-lang to go-openoffice-de. Thanks in advance Adam Hani Schakaki

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request - ptscotch_esmumps
by Michele Mocciola 06 Mar '10

06 Mar '10

Please, remove ptscotch_esmumps (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32330). I created this package because I thought it was different from ptscotch, however it seems identical: I linked mumps with ptscotch and ptscotch_esmumps and I saw no difference. So I think it can be safely deleted. mickele

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: fltk-no_as-needed
by Philipp 06 Mar '10

06 Mar '10

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34869 fltk-no_as-needed is no longer required, fltk in [extra] is now compiled the same way. Thanks Pierre!

2 1

[aur-general] Inactivity
by Angel Velásquez 06 Mar '10

06 Mar '10

Hi, I will be Inactive from today to the monday, since I am on a PyCamp and the internet conection here is kinda limited (1024 kbps) .. Feel free to update/fix/w/e of my packages! -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com

1 0

[aur-general] Orphan request for mksh
by Quentin Stiévenart 05 Mar '10

05 Mar '10

Hi, Could someone please orphan the AUR package mksh[1], since it's flagged out of date (and can easily be updated) and the pkger doesn't answer to comments, Thanks. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3431

2 3

[aur-general] AVR toolchain update (patches for PKGBUIDs)
by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi 05 Mar '10

05 Mar '10

Hello All builds tested on i686 and x86_64 machine. * binutils-avr - https://gist.github.com/21dfd395add8270875fb - updated to 2.20.1 - removed uneeded the "as-needed" patch :P - rename info pages to avr-* to avoid conflicts with binutils - remove redundants "rm". - removed .install was needed before. - use build() and package() * gcc-avr - https://gist.github.com/b6e51e2adb5031b7407b - updated to 4.4.3 - removed flex as makedepends that is part of base-devel - use build() and package() * avr-libc - https://gist.github.com/6ef738c9bc0d2901eadb - updated to 1.6.8 - converted to arch=any since this package does is not arch dependent of installed enviroment. - use build() and package() * avrdude - https://gist.github.com/2e6895ef91dd72af9d93 - updated to 5.10 - removed bison and flex as depends since these packages are part of base-devel - use build() and package() Good luck! -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

1 0

[aur-general] saga-gis and ggobi packages
by Fuchs, Dominik 05 Mar '10

05 Mar '10

Dear all, I'd be interested in taking over the maintanance of the saga-gis and ggobi packages, they appear to be unmaintained as updates have not occured since 2007 - the author (ChicoGeek) has not replied to an e-mail in early March. Could you orphan them so I can adopt? Regards, Dominik --- Dominik Fuchs (dominik.fuchs(a)wur.nl) PhD candidate Wageningen UR, Land Dynamics Group, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands tel.: +31 (0) 3174 82038 - fax: +31 (0) 3174 19000 www.lad.wur.nl www.disclaimer-uk.wur.nl

2 1

[aur-general] plz remove perl-parse-recdescent
by Caleb Cushing 05 Mar '10

05 Mar '10

uploaded as a temporary workaround for a problem now fixed in community package. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com

2 1

[aur-general] kernels packages
by Mirco Chinelli 04 Mar '10

04 Mar '10

Hi guys! In the last days i have experienced some problems with kernel26-bfs and relative nvidia drivers. I don't think it's packagers' fault. But the only way I used to make the kernel package work it out is to use the PKGBUILD from the arch repository adapted to my needs.PKGBUILD for splitted packages is the main difference. I guess that could reduce maintainers' workload. I read we can't use this way to make packages, but why? Thanks! Bye Apologies in advance for my bad english. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mirco Chinelli - Proto e-mail: infinity89(a)fastwebmail.it Gmail/GTalk/Jabber: infinity89.linux(a)gmail.com MSN: cmir89(a)hotmail.com skype: mirco.chinelli Linux Foundation Member: mirco.chinelli(a)linux.com

3 3

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Aur-general March 2010