February 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Feb '12

29 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 6 signoffs 2. bisson - 5 signoffs 3. dan - 4 signoffs 4. ibiru - 3 signoffs 5. stephane - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package Deletion Request: 3to2-hg
by Jarek Sedlacek 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Can someone delete 3to2-hg? I maintain 3to2 as well as the latest version from mercurial, but since the project has stopped updating there is no point in maintaining the development version. Thanks, Jarek Sedlacek

2 1

[aur-general] disown pure 0.47
by Bjoern Lindig 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Hi everybody, at first I would like to say thank you. I'm with archlinux since quite some time now (I think it was 2009 when I moved over from debian), but I never had anything serious to ask on a list or the forum. Sometimes the guys from the IRC-Channels or the archaudios where helping out. All the rest I could solve on my own with the help of the docs and the archives in the forum. For me this shows how good arch works! Now, I would like to advertize archlinux in the pure community. For that I would like to update as many of the pure-packages as possible. Unfortunately the package of pure itself is unmaintained since quite a while. It is stuck with version 0.47 where the actual version of pure is 0.51. So it might be about half a year, that nobody took care of it: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22893 I wrote a mail to the maintainer 'sdiehl' yesterday and I asked him to disown the package so that I can update and maintain it. If this mail rests unanswered I'd ask somebody to disown it. With kind regards, Bjoern

3 4

[aur-general] Disown Request cellwriter
by Adonay Sanz Alsina 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

please disown the next package cellwriter https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12663 the user dont respond any request, by message in aur page, for at least a few weeks and, the package is outdated for a years. I can't send email, because isn't. It's flagged out-of-date cause not compile. I can mantain it. Thanks, Adonay

4 3

[aur-general] package deletion request: waf-svn
by François Boulogne 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Hi Could you delete python-waf-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48189 Reason, waf moved to git as announced in one comment. Thank you. Cheers, -- François Boulogne. https://www.sciunto.org

2 1

[aur-general] Disown Request Pidgin-Festival
by Adonay Sanz Alsina 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

please disown the next package Pidgin-Festival https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22970 the user dont respond any request, by message in aur page and email, for at least a few weeks and, the package is outdated for a weeks. I flagged out-of-date cause not compile. I can mantain it. Thanks, Adonay

4 3

[aur-general] Removal request - pygame2-py3
by Ольга 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Author of package pygame2-py3 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39071) moved it to satisfy naming guidelines so it should be removed.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 3 signoffs 2. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] AUR is doubling required by packages
by member graysky 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Browse to: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50911 Here is what I show for required by package... why are some of these doubled? Required by broadcom-wl-ck broadcom-wl-ck lirc-ck lirc-ck nvidia-275xx-ck nvidia-275xx-ck nvidia-beta-ck nvidia-ck nvidia-ck r8168-ck r8168-ck vhba-module-ck vhba-module-ck

3 2

[aur-general] Requesting removal: python-vatnumber
by Luis von Bernus 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Hi! python-vatnumber is Hopelessly outdated (0.5 while current is 1.0), orphaned and depends on python2, so I submitted it as python2-vatnumber for easier recognition Thanks! Luis

3 4