February 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 13 signoffs 2. tomegun - 13 signoffs 3. dan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal Request: emacs-linum-mode
by Ruslan Nabioullin 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

The "emacs-linum-mode" AUR package [1] appears to be unnecessary with the introduction of linum-mode in emacs 23.1 and thus should be deleted. bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/etc/NEWS.23: ... * New Modes and Packages in Emacs 23.1 ... ** linum.el is a new minor mode to display line numbers for the current buffer. ... http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0225855/linum/linum.el: ;;; linum.el --- Display line numbers to the left of buffers ;; Copyright (C) 2007, 2008 Markus Triska ;; Author: Markus Triska <markus.triska(a)gmx.at> ... (defconst linum-version "0.9wza") ... /usr/share/emacs/23.4/lisp/linum.el.gz: ;;; linum.el --- display line numbers in the left margin ;; Copyright (C) 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ;; Author: Markus Triska <markus.triska(a)gmx.at> ... (defconst linum-version "0.9x") ... [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49255 -Ruslan -- Ruslan Nabioullin rnabioullin(a)gmail.com

2 1

[aur-general] [delete] pyasn1, pysnmp, and pysnmp-devel
by Matthew Monaco 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

I've created python-pyasn1, python2-pyasn1, python-pysnmp, and python2-pysnmp using the current python packaging guidelines. Please remove the outdated, obsolete, and incorrectly packaged alternatives: pyasn1[1] - I have not heard from the maintainer for 2 weeks pysnmp[2] - Same maintainer pysnmp-devel[3] - orphan It might be best to merge the votes and notifications, so if possible please merge pyasn1[1] into python2-pyasn1[4]. Also merge pysnmp[2] and pysnmp-devel[3] into python2-pysnmp[5]. If the comments can be left out, then please do as they don't really pertain to these new packages. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6392 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42254 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6381 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56608 [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56610 -Matt

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: Tryton
by Robin Baumgartner 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

Hi Various tryton packages in the AUR have been marked out-of-date for a year or more. I have adopted the already orphaned packages, but a lot of them are still owned by tomprogrammer. He did not respond to my email, so I am asking you for help: Please disown the packages marked as out-of-date here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&K=tryton&do_Search=Go Additionally, please delete these: [trytond-product_cost_fifo]: Wrong naming scheme, replacement already uploaded https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56905 [trytond-google-translate]: No longer maintained upstream https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31742 Thanks, Robin

2 1

[aur-general] removal of archfs
by Jozef Riha 22 Feb '12

22 Feb '12

could you please remove archfs (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14524) from aur? the project has been renamed and moved to http://code.google.com/p/rdiff-backup-fs/ - pkgbuild for rdiff-backup-fs already exists and contains replaces=('archfs') thank you, jose

2 1

[aur-general] removal of dcron-maint from aur
by Jozef Riha 22 Feb '12

22 Feb '12

hello, please remove dcron-maint (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46757) as this was only a temporary pkgbuild fixing dcron. thank you, jose Comment by: giddie on Thu, 05 May 2011 11:08:06 +0000 Anyone using this package should now switch back to dcron 4.5 in [core]. Comment by: Profjim on Sun, 01 May 2011 01:46:00 +0000 Thanks. These fixes will be rolled into dcron 4.5, to be released shortly. They're also rolled into dcron-git.

4 5

[aur-general] removal of pacmanager3
by Jozef Riha 22 Feb '12

22 Feb '12

please, delete pkgbuild for pacmanager3 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50471) it is an unmaintained (and outdated) duplicate of pacmanager. thank you, jose

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Feb '12

22 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 7 signoffs 2. ibiru - 4 signoffs 3. stephane - 1 signoffs 4. dreisner - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] aurperl orphanage
by Justin Davis 22 Feb '12

22 Feb '12

I'm orphaning about 600 perl packages from the AUR. I no longer have the time or feel the urge to maintain these packages anymore and there seems to be other people interested lately. About a year ago most of these packages were orphaned by xenoterracide and I wanted to keep an eye on them and update the ones people were using, or were complaining about being broken, adding comments to, etc. I think most of them are junk and don't really need to be on the AUR but I updated a little over 200 of them regularly. Anyways... if you like maintaining perl packages, pick up your favorite. I have a list of them all but it's pretty long so I didn't paste it in here. -- -Justin

3 2

[aur-general] Dropping packages
by Jelle van der Waa 21 Feb '12

21 Feb '12

Hi, I plan to drop polipo and probably pstreams too, although not sure if pstreams is an makedep/optdep for some package in the repo. If anyone wants to adopt them, do it! -- Jelle van der Waa

3 4