Aur-general February 2012

aur-general@lists.archlinux.org

101 participants
126 discussions

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Feb '12

19 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * courier-authlib-0.63.0-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * freeradius-2.1.12-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * courier-authlib-0.63.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * freeradius-2.1.12-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bluewind - 3 signoffs 2. dreisner - 3 signoffs 3. allan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Which aur uploader is better, aurploader or burp?
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 18 Feb '12

18 Feb '12

I realize there are two AUR uploader helper, aurploader[1] and burp[2]？Which one is you guys using? What's the pro and con? Thank you Techlive Zheng [1]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23393 [2]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37216

10 19

[aur-general] Accidentally overwrote package...
by Julien Nicoulaud 18 Feb '12

18 Feb '12

Hi, I created a package and uploaded it to the AUR, but it seems there was already one with the same name since it has votes and the name of another contributor appears... I guess it was orphaned and I automatically adopted it by uploading a new version ? Is there some history to check it referred at least to the same software ? It think it would be better if maintainers had to explicitly click "Adopt" before being allowed to upload new versions of packages. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10774 Regards

5 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Feb '12

18 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 7 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (7 total) == * courier-authlib-0.63.0-8 (i686) * freeradius-2.1.12-4 (i686) * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (i686) * courier-authlib-0.63.0-8 (x86_64) * freeradius-2.1.12-4 (x86_64) * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (x86_64) * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * courier-authlib-0.63.0-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * freeradius-2.1.12-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * courier-authlib-0.63.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * freeradius-2.1.12-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] (no subject)
by Pedro Emílio Machado de Brito 18 Feb '12

18 Feb '12

Can anyone please e-mail me the AUR username associated with this e-mail address? Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Request for removal
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 17 Feb '12

17 Feb '12

[1]plymouth-systemd-git can be removed as support for systemd was just added to [2]plymouth-git package. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51715 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26117

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Feb '12

17 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 14 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (14 total) == * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (i686) * ipvsadm-1.26-2 (i686) * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (x86_64) * ipvsadm-1.26-2 (x86_64) * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 6 signoffs 2. thomas - 4 signoffs 3. dan - 4 signoffs 4. tpowa - 4 signoffs 5. allan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Request for removal.
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 17 Feb '12

17 Feb '12

[1]xvba-video-0.8.0 provides the ready built binary version of the open- sourced version of xvba-video. [2]xvba-video-open provides the same 0.8.0 version, with the exception that it builds it from source. Practically looking the only difference is that xvba-video-open needs the xvba-sdk package as a build time depency, but that package consists only of couple header files, so building it takes <10s. So please remove [1]xvba-video-0.8.0 as it serves no reason and only complicates the xvba-video situation, by providing one more package to choose from. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56177 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51703

3 4

[aur-general] Removal request: mingw32-bdwgc
by Schala Zeal 16 Feb '12

16 Feb '12

I have since renamed this package to mingw32-gc to reduce confusion, in comparison to the packages gc and lib32-gc

2 3

[aur-general] Orphaning wxgtk-2.9
by Maxime Gauduin 16 Feb '12

16 Feb '12

Hi guys, I'd like to know if it's possible to orphan this package<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31421> so I can update it. wxgtk 2.9.3 has been out for more than 2 months, and the maintainer hasn't answered my one month old request to update it and flagging out of date. I'm maintaining the svn version of aegisub which needs this package up to date along with an option to disable compatibility with older wxgtk versions, which makes sense since the package is designed to coexist with older versions. Thank you in advance. -- Alucryd

2 1

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
13
Older →

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Aur-general February 2012