April 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Allan McRae 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

On 09/04/12 17:56, Daniel Campbell wrote: > I would contribute if a. My dev machine had internet and b. If i thought my work had a chance of being considered. Given that I'm not a TU or a regular among the devs, my work would not likely be accepted. What a load of crap... Everyone submitted their first patch at one stage.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 5 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pacman-contrib-4.0.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (5 total) == * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-03-25 * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any), since 2012-03-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 2 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 1 signoffs 3. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Daniel Campbell 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

I would contribute if a. My dev machine had internet and b. If i thought my work had a chance of being considered. Given that I'm not a TU or a regular among the devs, my work would not likely be accepted. I guess things will stay as they are until someone important dislikes them. I'm not one for jumping through hoops. Sent from my Nokia phone

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Bartłomiej Piotrowski 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

On 04/09/2012 09:46 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > It is simple, actually. When a user uploads a package, they should be given rights to remove it if need be. Simply claiming an orphan wouldn't grant the rights. That way only mods and original uploaders would get permission to remove packages and it wouldn't be prone to abuse. It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples everything. > > Sorry for not quoting. My phone isn't fancy enough for it. > > Sent from my Nokia phone It's often said: patches welcome. You can fill feature request on our bugtracker. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Automated Package Removal
by Daniel Campbell 09 Apr '12

09 Apr '12

It is simple, actually. When a user uploads a package, they should be given rights to remove it if need be. Simply claiming an orphan wouldn't grant the rights. That way only mods and original uploaders would get permission to remove packages and it wouldn't be prone to abuse. It would also contribute less clutter to the mailing list and less hassle for people that make innocuous mistakes like mine. Bureaucracy cripples everything. Sorry for not quoting. My phone isn't fancy enough for it. Sent from my Nokia phone

1 0

[aur-general] merge/delete vala
by Oliver Bandel 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

Hello, there is a lot of vala stuff in AUR. Some sems to be outdated: vala-010 0.10.4-1 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47882 vala-09 0.9.8-3 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45525 vala-012 0.12.1-3 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52935 ======= MORE UP TO DATE: vala-git 20120216-1 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31429 vala-devel 0.16.0-1 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38260 Ciao, Oliver

2 1

[aur-general] delete/merge request: icon theme meliae
by Dirk 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

I adopted and updated xfce-theme-meliae [1] before realising it's now a duplicate of meliae-svg-icon-theme [2]. Please delete or merge my version [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38572 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33832 There also seems to be a duplicate of an older version 0.7.2 [3] & [4]. [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22544 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48623 Dirk

2 1

[aur-general] Forgotten username
by Philipp Kroos 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

Hi, I can't remember the username I registered with in the aur... This is the email-address associated with it. Could an admin be so kind to drop me a mail with the name? Thanks, Philipp

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.3-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pacman-contrib-4.0.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * clanlib-2.3.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * contacts-0.12-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dates-0.4.11-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tasks-0.20-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686), since 2012-03-24 * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686), since 2012-03-24 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 12 signoffs 2. tpowa - 4 signoffs 3. ibiru - 1 signoffs 4. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Off
by Xavier D. 08 Apr '12

08 Apr '12

Hi, I'll be off for 3 weeks with no or limited access to Internet. Please don't disown or delete my packages (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=magicrhesus&SeB=m) in the meantine. Thanks

1 0