Aur-general May 2012

aur-general@lists.archlinux.org

102 participants
149 discussions

[aur-general] request for removal
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 11 May '12

11 May '12

Please remove the following packages: [1]wine-dib: Patch included in upstream since version 1.3.37 [2]wine-no-x: Really old version 1.1.39, 0 votes, orphan. Does notserve so big purpose, easy to remake the PKGBUILD if needed. [3]wine-opt: Not updated since Novenber 2011, only change compared to the repo version seems to be that this is installed in /opt dir instead of /usr, no vote, in general doesn't seem usefull at all. Reupload if needed. [4]wine-uk: Not updated since 2009, no votes, orphan. [5]wine-hacks: Git repo not updated since 2010, more likely has more bugs than fixes when compared to repo version. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51636 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34644 [3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53832 [4]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33255 [5]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19675

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: taglib-svn
by Jekyll Wu 11 May '12

11 May '12

The upstrem[1] has moved from svn to git, and it is hosted on github[2] now. So please remove taglib-svn[3]. Thanks. Regards Jekyll [1] http://developer.kde.org/~wheeler/taglib.html#git [2] https://github.com/taglib/taglib [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25858

2 1

[aur-general] xf86-input-egalax package replacement and merging
by Padfoot 11 May '12

11 May '12

Hi, I have recently taken up maintenance of the orphaned package xf86-input-egalax https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35045 This package will replace the package xf86-input-egalax-linux3 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55050 to provide a more standard package name. Can someone please check the PKGBUILD in xf86-input-egalax to confirm I have written it correctly so when users with package xf86-input-egalax-linux3 next update, it will be replaced with xf86-input-egalax? Upon this confirmation, can we please merge xf86-input-egalax-linux3 into xf86-input-egalax? I also notice there are 2 other orphaned packages which provide the same functionality. They are both out of date, orphaned and no longer build. Can these be deleted please? touchkit: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18766 xf86-input-egalax-beta: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43641 There is a 3rd out of date package which no longer builds, but is not orphaned. It has not been updated since 23 June 2010. xf86-input-egalax-xorg18: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38300 Do I need to contact this maintainer first before requesting the package to be deleted? Thanks. Lachlan.

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 May '12

11 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-5 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120412-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (5 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any), since 2012-04-17 * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64), since 2012-04-26 * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686), since 2012-04-26 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. pierre - 1 signoffs 2. dreisner - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] (no subject)
by Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira 11 May '12

11 May '12

Hello! I'm the maintainer of the package rosa-media-player. The packages rosa-media-player<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54417>and rosa-media-player-bin <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56581> are duplicate packages. Upon contacting the maintainer of the second, he informed he was no longer interested in maintaning it. Therefore, I would like to request that both packages be merged, so that only AUR package is provided for rosa media player. Regards, Dominor. <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54417><https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54417>

2 1

[aur-general] Remove: ipset-init
by David Rawson Couzelis 11 May '12

11 May '12

Please remove "ipset-init", owned by me, drcouzelis. It is no longer necessary. It's functionality is now included in the "ipset" package. Thank you.

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Stefan Mark 11 May '12

11 May '12

'madasul-svn' (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51801) the project changed focus and will be renamed and restarted. Nobody used it anyway :)

2 1

[aur-general] Looking to get aur/icecream dropped
by Isaac C. Aronson 10 May '12

10 May '12

The icecream package in the aur has been out of date for quite a while now, and the maintainer seems to have deserted it. I have a working replacement package at icecream-systemd that I'd like to replace the current icecream package with. Could someone drop it for me, please?

3 3

[aur-general] Vote results for speps' TU application
by Thorsten Töpper 10 May '12

10 May '12

Hello, the vote for speps' application is over so it's time to publish the results: Yes: 20 No: 1 Abstain: 2 Participants: 23 active TUs: 27 So the conditions are met, congratulations speps, please follow the further procedure as described in the wiki[1]. :-) I've already updated your status at the AUR. Thorsten [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines -- Jabber: atsutane(a)freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4

12 11

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 May '12

10 May '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 7 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * i3lock-2.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (5 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * awesome-3.4.11-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mariadb-5.5.23-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * vicious-2.0.4-2 (any), since 2012-04-17 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Older →

Jump to page:

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Aur-general May 2012